This article examines a natural field experiment in mediation of employment disputes at the United States Postal Service. Theory suggests that early mediation will lead to earlier, more durable settlements and transaction cost savings. Implementation of the mediation program resulted in a significant decrease in the number of formal discrimination complaints. A well designed employment dispute mediation program can resolve disputes at an earlier stage in the administrative process, and thereby reduce the number of formal complaints filed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, J. W., Hensler, D. R., & Nelson, C. E. (1983). Simple justice: How litigants fare in thePittsburgh court arbitration program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
2.
Anderson, J. F., & Bingham, L. B. (1997). Upstream effects from mediation of workplace disputes: Some preliminary evidence from the USPS. Labor Law Journal, 48, 601-615.
3.
Bemmels, B., & Foley, J. (1996). Grievance procedure research: A review and theoretical recommendations. Journal of Management, 22(3), 359-384.
4.
Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 289-319.
5.
Bingham, L. B. (1997a). Alternative dispute resolution in public administration. In C. Newland and P. Cooper (Eds.), The Handbook of Public Law and Public Administration (pp. 546-566). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Bingham, L. B. (1997b). Mediating employment disputes: Perceptions of REDRESS™ at the United States Postal Service. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17(2), 20-30.
7.
Bingham, L. B., & Chachere, D. R. (1999). Dispute resolution in employment: The need for research. In A. E. Eaton & J. H. Keefe (Eds.), 1999 Industrial Relations Research Association Research Volume: Employment Dispute Resolution and Worker Rights in the Changing Workplace (pp. 95-135). Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
8.
Bingham, L. B., Chesmore, G., Moon, Y., & Napoli, L. M. (2000). Mediating employment disputes at the United States Postal Service: A comparison of in-house and outside neutral mediator models. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(1), 4-19.
9.
Bingham, L. B., & Napoli, L. M. (2001). Employment dispute resolution and workplace culture: The REDRESS™ program at the United States Postal Service. In M. Breger & J. Schatz (Eds.), The Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution Deskbook (pp. 507-526). Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
10.
Bingham, L. B., & Wise, C. R. (1996). The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of1990: How do we evaluate its success?Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 6(3), 383-414.
11.
Boroff, K. E., & D. Lewin. (1997). Loyalty, voice, and intent to exit a union firm: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 51(1), 50-63.
12.
Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. (1983). Grievance mediation in the coal industry: A field experiment. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37(1), 49-67.
13.
Bush, R. A. B., & Folger, J. (1994). The promise of mediation: Responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Bush, R. A. B., & Folger, J. (1996). Transformative mediation and third-party intervention: Ten hallmarks of a transformative approach to practice. Mediation Quarterly, 13, 263-278.
15.
Cappelli, P., & Chauvin, K. (1991). A test of an efficiency model of grievance activity. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45(1), 3-14.
16.
Carnevale, P. J., & Pruitt, D. G. (1992). Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 521-582.
17.
Clarke, S. H., Donnelly, L. F., & Grove, S. A. (1989). Court-ordered arbitration in NorthCarolina: An evaluation of its effects. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Government.
18.
Clarke, S. H., Donnelly, L. F., & Grove, S. A. (1991). Court-ordered arbitration in NorthCarolina: Case outcomes and litigant satisfaction. The Justice System Journal, 14(2), 154-181.
19.
Costantino, C. A., & Merchant, C. S. (1996). Designing conflict management systems: A guide to creating productive and healthy organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Daus, M. W. (1995). Mediating claims of discrimination. Dispute Resolution Journal, 50(4), 51-54.
21.
Dunlop, J. T., & Zack, A. M. (1997). The mediation and arbitration of employment disputes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Eaglin, J. B. (1990). The Pre-Argument Conference Program in the Sixth Circuit Court ofAppeals. Washington, DC: The Federal Judicial Center.
23.
Evans, R. J. (1998). Notes and comments: The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of1996: Improving federal agency use of alternative dispute resolution processes. Administrative Law Review, 50(1), 217-233.
24.
Feuille, P. (1992). Why does grievance mediation resolve grievances?Negotiation Journal, 8(2), 131-145.
25.
Feuille, P. (1999). Grievance mediation. In A. E. Eaton & J. Keefe (Eds.), Employment dispute resolution and worker rights in the changing workplace (pp. 187-217). Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
26.
Feuille, P., & Delaney, J. T. (1992). The individual pursuit of organizational justice: Grievance procedures in nonunion workplaces. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 10, 187-232.
27.
Feuille, P., & Kolb, D. M. (1994). Waiting in the wings: Mediation’s role in grievance resolution. Negotiation Journal, 10(3), 249-264.
28.
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin.
29.
Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of ‘voice’ and improvement on experience inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
30.
Gadlin, H. (1991). Careful maneuvers: Mediating sexual harassment. Negotiation Journal, 7, 139-154.
31.
Gann, T. (2001). Recruiting and training outside neutrals. In M. Breger & J. Schatz (Eds.), The Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution Deskbook (pp. 623-629). Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
32.
Goldberg, S. B., & Brett, J. M. (1983, March). An experiment in the mediation of grievances. Monthly Labor Review, 23-30.
33.
Hartwell, S., & Bermant, G. (1988). Alternative dispute resolution in a bankruptcy court. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
34.
Hensler, D. R., Lipson, A. J., & Rolph, E. S. (1981). Judicial arbitration in California: The first year. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
35.
House, N. C. (1992). Grievance mediation: AT&T’s experience. Labor Law Journal, 43, 491-495.
36.
Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1997). The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. American Economic Review, 87(2), 291-313.
37.
Kakalik, J. S., Dunworth, T., Hill, L. A., McCaffrey, D., Oshiro, M., Pace, N. M., & Vaiana, M. E. (1996). An evaluation of mediation and early neutral evaluation under the Civil Justice Reform Act. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
38.
Knishkowy, J. (1994). USDA Dispute Resolution Board Pilot Project evaluation: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
39.
Labig, C. E., & Greer, C. R. (1988). Grievance initiation: A literature survey and suggestions for future research. Journal of Labor Research, 9(1), 1-27.
40.
Lewicki, R. J., Weiss, S. E., & Lewin, D. (1992). Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 209-252.
41.
Lewin, D. (1993). Conflict resolution and management in contemporary work organizations: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 12, 167-209.
42.
Lewin, D. (1999). Theoretical and empirical research on the grievance procedure and arbitration: A critical review. In A. E. Eaton and J. Keefe (Eds.), Employment dispute resolution and worker rights in the changing workplace (pp. 137-185). Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
43.
Lewin, D., & Peterson, R. B. (1988). The modern grievance procedure in the United States. New York: Quorum.
44.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
45.
MacCoun, R. J., Lind, E. A., Hensler, D. R., Bryant, D. L., & Ebener, P. A. (1988). Alternative adjudication: An evaluation of the New Jersey Automobile Arbitration Program (Publication No. R-3676-ICJ). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
46.
McEwen, C. A. (1994). An Evaluation of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’sPilot Mediation Program. Washington, DC: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
47.
McEwen, C. A., & Maiman, R. J. (1981). Small claims mediation in Maine: An empirical assessment. Maine Law Review, 33, 237-268.
48.
McEwen, C. A., & Maiman, R. J. (1984). Mediation in small claims court: Achieving compliance through consent. Law & Society Review, 18(1), 11-49.
49.
Meierhoefer, B. (1990). Court-annexed arbitration in ten district courts. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
50.
Mesch, D. J., & Dalton, D. R. (1992). Unexpected consequences of improving workplace justice: A six-year time series assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 35(5), 1099-1114.
51.
Moon, Y., & Bingham, L. B. (2000, June 19). Transformative mediation at work: Employee and supervisor perceptions. Paper presented at the International Association of Conflict Management Conference, St. Louis, MO.
52.
Moore, C. (1996). The Mediation Process (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Nabatchi, T., & Bingham, L. B. (2001). Transformative mediation in the USPSREDRESS™ Program: Observations of ADR specialists. Hofstra Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 18(2), 399-427.
54.
Niemic, R. J. (1998). Mediation in bankruptcy: The Federal Judicial Center survey of mediation participants. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
55.
Rauma, D., & Krafka, C. (1994). Voluntary arbitration in eight federal district courts: An evaluation. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
56.
Rowe, M. P. (1981). Dealing with sexual harassment. Harvard Business Review, 59(3), 42-47.
57.
Rowe, M. P. (1990a). Helping people help themselves: An ADR option for interpersonal conflict. Negotiation Journal, 6(3), 239-248.
58.
Rowe, M. P. (1990b). People who feel harassed need a complaint system with both formal and informal options. Negotiation Journal, 6(2), 161-172.
59.
Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. M. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1167-1177.
60.
Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Minton, J. W. (1992). Organizational Justice: The Search for fairness in the workplace. New York: Lexington Books.
61.
Stewart, G. L., & Davy, J. A. (1992). An empirical examination of grievance resolution and filing rates in the public and private sector. Journal of Collective Negotiations, 21(4), 323-335.
62.
Stienstra, D., Johnson, M., & Lombard, P. (1997). Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management: A study of the five demonstration programs established under the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
63.
U. S. General Accounting Office. (1995). Employment discrimination: Most private-sector employers use alternative dispute resolution (GAO/HEHS-95-150). Washington, DC: Author.
64.
U. S. General Accounting Office. (1997). Alternative dispute resolution: Employers’ experiences with ADR in the workplace (GAO/GGD-97-157). Washington, DC: Author.
65.
Ury, W., Brett, J., & Goldberg, S. (1988). Getting disputes resolved: Designing systems to cut the cost of conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
66.
Wall, J. A., & Lynn, A. (1993). Mediation: A current review. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37(1), 160-194.
