Campbell, A.K. (1978). Revitalizing the federal personnel system. Public Personnel Management7 (6), 58-63.
2.
DiIulio, J.J., Jr. (1994). Deregulating the public sector: Can government be improved?Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
3.
Kellough, J.E. (1998). The reinventing government movement: A review and critique. Public Administration Quarterly22 (1), 6-20.
4.
Kettl, D., Ingraham, P.W., Sanders, R., & Horner, C. (1996). Civil service reform: Building a government that works. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
5.
National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). (1983). Revitalizing federal management: Managers and their overburdened systems. Washington, DC: NAPA.
6.
National Performance Review/National Partnership for Reinventing Government (NPR) (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs lessWashington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
7.
Perry, J., Wise, L.R., & Martin, M. (1994). Breaking the civil service mold: The case of Indianapolis. Review of Public Personnel Administration14(2), 40-54.
8.
Peters, B.G. (1996). The future of governing: Four emergingmodels . Lawrence, KS: The University of Kansas Press.
9.
Peters, B.G., & Savoie, D.J. (1996). Managing incoherence: The coordination and empowerment conundrum. Public Administration Review56 (3), 281-290.
10.
Romzek, B.S. (1997). Accountability challenges of deregulation. In C. Ban & N. Riccucci (Eds.), Public personnel management : Current reforms, future challenges. New York: Longman.
11.
Thompson, F.J. (1994). The Winter Commission Report: Is deregulation the answer for public personnel management. Review of Public Personnel Administration14(2), 5-10.
12.
Winter Commission (National Commission on the State and Local Public Service) (1993). Hard truths/tough choices:An agenda for state local reform. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government.