Book Reviews : London,Manuel (1997). Job feedback: Giving,seeking,and using feedback for performance improvement. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,211pp

Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, No. 97-579 (Seventh Circuit, 1998).

Gore, A. (1993). From red tape to results, creating a government that works better and costs less. Report of the National Performance Review . Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Offce.

Kellough, J.E. , Selden, S.C. (1997). Pay-for-performance systems in state government: Perceptions of state agency personnel managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration 17 (1), 5-21.

Kellough, J.E. , Haoran, L. (1993). The paradox of merit pay in the public sector: Persistence of a problematic procedure. Review of Public Personnel Administration 13 (2), 45-64.

Kettl, Donald F. (1 994). Reinventing government? Appraising the National Performance Review. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution.

Mani, B. (1999). Research notes based on 20 years of experience in the Internal Revenue Service, Greenville, North Carolina .

National Training Laboratory Institute for Applied Behavioral Science (1999). National Training Laboratory Institute Program Guide. Alexandria, Virginia. <http://www.ntl.org>.

Performance Management and Recognition Act (P. L. 103-189, 30 September 1993) 103 U. S. Statutes at Large, pp. 981-985. Repealed Statute 1 1 80 of Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (PL 95-454, 13 October 1978) 95 United States Statutes at Large, pp. II I I-1 227. Repealed Training for Employees under the Office of the Architect of the Capitol and the Botanic Garden (P. 0 97-346, 15 October 1982) 97 United States Statutes at Large, p. 1647. Repealed Statutes 3208 of Civil Service Reurement Spouse Equity Act of 1984 (P. L. 98-615, 8 November 1984) 98 United States Statutes at Large, pp. 3195-3220. Repealed Statutes 1351 of Technical and Miscellaneous Civil Service Amendments Act of 1992 (P. L. 102-378, 2 October 1992) 102 United States Statutes at Large, pp 1346-1361