Scores on the WIS-III from 280 children with learning disabilities were analyzed with confirmatory factor analysis. Six competing models reported in the literature were tested and then cross-validated in an independent sample of 240 children with learning disabilities. Results revealed that a 4-factor model offered the most accurate and stable explanation of the data when the Symbol Search subtest was included. A 3-factor model also fit the data closely and behaved reliably when the Symbol Search subtest was excluded from the analysis. Both models left much of the variance for each subtest unexplained, however, and correlations between the subscale (factor) scores and their respective factors indicated that the Freedom from Distractibility subscale was saturated with unidentified sources of variation in both models. The practical implications of these results were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, S. R. , & Thorndike, R. M. (1995a). Stability of the WPPSI-R and WISC-III factor structure using cross-validation of covariance structure models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 3-20.
2.
Allen, S. R. , & Thorndike, R. M. (1995b). Stability of the WAIS-R and WISC-III factor structure using cross-validation of covariance structures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 650-657.
3.
Anastopoulos, A. D. , Spisto, M. A., & Maher, M. C. (1994). The WISC-III freedom from distractibility factor: Its utility in identifying children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychological Assessment, 6, 368-371.
4.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
5.
Browne, M. W. , & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). What abilities are measured by the WISC-III? [Special issue. Monograph, WISC-III series]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 134-143.
7.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Harris, R. J. (1985) A primer of multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
9.
Hishinuma, E. S. , & Yamakawa, R. (1993). Construct and criterion-related validity of the WISC-III for exceptional students and those who are “at risk” [Special issue, Monograph, WISC-III series]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 94-104
10.
Jöreskog, K. , & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Kamphaus, R. (1993). Clinical assessment of children's intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Kamphaus, R. W. , Benson, J., Hutchinson, S., & Platt, L. O. (1994). Identification of factor models for the WISC-III. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 174-186.
13.
Kaufman, A. S. (1994). A reply to Macmann and Barnett: Lessons from the blind men and the elephant. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 199-207.
14.
Keith, T. Z. (1994). Intelligence is important, intelligence is complex. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 209-221.
15.
Kirk, S. A. , Gallagher, J. J., & Anastasiow, N. J. (1997). Educating exceptional children, 8th edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
16.
Konold, T. R. , Kush, J. C., & Canivez, G. L. (1997). Factor replication of the WISC-III in three independent samples of children receiving special education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 15, 123-137.
17.
Kush, J. C. , & Watkins, M. W. (1994). Factor structure of the WISC-III for Mexican-American, learning disabled students (Clearing House No. TM 022 083). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. ED 374 154)
18.
Macmann, G. M. , & Barnett, D. W. (1994). Structural analysis of correlated factors: Lessons from the Verbal-Performance dichotomy of the Wechsler scales. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 161-197.
19.
Marsh, H. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 5-34.
20.
McDonald, R. P. , & Mulaik, S. A. (1979). Determinacy of common factors: A nontechnical review. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 297-306.
21.
Parker, K. C. , & Atkinson, L. (1994). Factor space of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition: Critical thoughts and recommedations. Psychological Assessment, 6, 201-208.
22.
Reynolds, C. R. , & Ford, L. (1994). Comparative three-factor solutions of the WISC-I1 and WISC-R at 11 age levels between 61/2 and 161 2 years. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 553-570.
23.
Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 369-379.
24.
Roid, G. H. , Prifitera, A., & Weiss, L. G. (1993). Replication of the WISC-III factor structure in an independent sample. [Special issue, Monograph, WISC-III series]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 11, 6-21.
25.
Roid, G. H. , & Worrall, W. (1997). Replication of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition four-factor model in the Canadian normative sample. Psychological Assessment, 9, 512-515.
26.
Sattler, J. (1992). Assessment of children: WISC-III and WPPSI-R supplement. San Diego, CA: Author.
27.
Stinnett, T. A. , Havey, J. M., & Oehler-Stinnet, J. (1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 331-350.
28.
Sullivan, P. M. , & Montoya, L. A. (1997). Factor analysis of the WISC-III with deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Psychological Assessment, 9, 317-321.
29.
Tupa, D. J. , Wright, M., & Fristad, M. A. (1997). Confirmatory factor analysis of the WISC-III with child psychiatric inpatients. Psychological Assessment, 9, 302-206.
30.
Wechsler, D. (1991). WISCIII manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
