Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Seven different short forms from the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition (SB:FE) were evaluated for use as screening instruments for high ability with a sample of 199 potentially gifted preschoolers. The seven abbreviated tests were extracted from one administration of the full test. Overall, reliability and validity coefficients for the short forms were uniformly excellent (ranging from .88 to .96 for reliability and .80 to .98 for correlations between short form and full test). Mean differences between all short forms and the full test Composite were small (ranging from 0.1 to 2.3 points). Screening cut scores were generated for all seven short forms using two different methods. Short-form cut scores were then compared to the full test in a classification analysis. Overall, a four-subtest short form consisting of Vocabulary, Pattern Analysis, Quantitative, and Memory for Sentences was recommended as the best for screening purposes, offering consistently excellent psychometric properties and a significantly shorter administration time.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkinson, L. (1991). Short forms of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition, for children with low intelligence. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 177-181.

Carvajal, H. , & Gerber, J. (1987). 1986 Stanford-Binet abbreviated forms. Psychological Reports, 61, 285-286.

DeLamatre, J. E. , & Hollinger, C. L. (1990). Utility of the Stanford-Binet IV abbreviated form for placing exceptional children. Psychological Reports, 67, 973-974.

Finch, A. J. , Childress, W. , & Ollendick, T. (1973). Comparison of separately administered and abstracted WISC short forms with the full scale WISC. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 755-756.

Glaub, V. E. , & Kamphaus, R. W. (1991). Construction of a nonverbal adaptation of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 231-241.

Kaufman, A. S. (1977). Should short-form validity coefficients be corrected? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1159-1161.

King, L. A. , & King, D. W. (1982). Wechsler short forms: A brief status report. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 433-438.

McCallum, R. S. , & Karnes, F. A. (1990). Use of a brief form of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Fourth) for gifted children. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 279-283.

Nagle, R. J. , & Bell, N. L. (1993). Validation of Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition abbreviated batteries with college students. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 227-231.

10.

Prewett, P. N. (1992). Short forms of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 10, 257-264.

11.

Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children: Revised and updated third edition. San Diego: Author.

12.

Silverstein, A. B. (1971). A corrected formula for assessing the validity of WAIS, WISC, and WPPSI short forms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 212-213.

13.

Silverstein, A. B. (1977). Comment on Kaufman's “Should short form validity coefficients be corrected?" Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1162-1163.

14.

Silverstein, A. B. (1982). Two- and four-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 415-418.

15.

Silverstein, A. B. (1985). An appraisal of three criteria for evaluating the usefulness of WAIS-R short forms. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(5), 676-680.

16.

Tellegen, A. , & Briggs, P. F. (1967). Old wine in new skins: Grouping Wechsler subtests into new scales. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31(5), 499-506.

17.

Thompson, A. P. (1987). Methodological issues in the clinical evaluation of two- and four-subtest short forms of the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 142-144.

18.

Thompson, A. P. , Howard, D. , & Anderson, J. (1986). Two- and four-subtest short-forms of the WAIS-R: Validity in a psychiatric sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18, 287-293.

19.

Thorndike, R. L. , Hagan, E. , & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Guide for administering and scoring the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Chicago: Riverside.

20.

Winner, E. (1997). Exceptionally high intelligence and schooling. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1070-1081.

Short Forms of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition for Screening Potentially Gifted Preschoolers

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References