Feuerstein, R., Haywood, H. C., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Jensen, M. R. (1986). Learning Potential Assessment Device manual. Jerusalem: Hadassah-Wizo-Canada Research Institute.
2.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. Baltimore: University Park Press.
3.
Frisby, C. L., & Braden, J. P. (1992). Feuerstein's dynamic assessment approach: A semantic, logical and empirical critique. Journal of Special Education, 26, 281-301.
4.
Lidz, C. (1991). A practitioner's guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
5.
Samuels, M., Klein, P., & Haywood, H. C. (1994). Cognitive modifiability. In International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
6.
Tzuriel, D. (1992). The dynamic assessment approach: A reply to Frisby and Braden. Journal of Special Education, 26, 302-324.
7.
Tzuriel, D. (in press). Dynamic interactive assessment of young children: Basic principles and measures. In J. M. Martinez-Belfran, J. Lebeer, & R. Garbo (Eds.), Is intelligence modifiable?Madrid: Bruno.
8.
Tzuriel, D., & Haywood, H. C. (1992). The development of interactive dynamic approaches to assessment of learning potential. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 3-37). New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. (1985). Analogical thinking modifiability in disadvantaged, regular special education and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13(4), 539-552.
10.
Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. (1987). Assessing the young child: Children's analogical thinking modifiability. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 268-287). New York: Guilford Press.
11.
Tzuriel, D., & Samuels, M. (in press). Dynamic assessment of learning potential: Inter-rater reliability of deficient cognitive functions, types of mediation and non-intellective factors. Journal of Cognitive Education.
