Reliability and Validity of the Southern California Ordinal Scales of Development for a Sample of Young Children with Disabilities

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Southern California Ordinal Scales of Development (SCOSD). The SCOSD is a criterion-referenced test that assesses six domains of development and was designed for use with children with disabilities. Results found that the SCOSD alpha internal consistency coefficients ranged from .94 to .98; percent agreement between raters ranged from 85% to 100%; and interrater correlations ranged from .96 to .99. Strong intercorrelations were found between the SCOSD and standardized domain-specific instruments (.65 to .92), providing evidence of concurrent validity. The secondary purpose was to investigate patterns of development across domains of the children's functioning. As expected, results revealed a hierarchy of skill development, with the children showing relatively less development in gross-motor skills and practical abilities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashurst, D. I. , Bamberg, E. , Barrett, J. , Bisno, A. , Burke, A. , Chambers, D. C. , Fentiman, J. , Kadish, R. , Mitchell, M. L. , Neeley L. , Thorne, T. , & Wents, D. (1985). Southern California Ordinal Scales of Development. North Hollywood, CA: Foreworks.

Ashurst, D. I. , Fentiman, J. , & Bamberg, E. (1980). Final project report: July 1, 1977 through June 30, 1980 (RFP 77-20). Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.

Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley Scales of Infant Development: Birth to two years. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Il. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Berman, S. , Miller, A. C. , Rosen, C. , & Bicchieri, S. M. (August, 1997). The effectiveness of team approaches for treating children with disabilities. Paper presented at the 105th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.

D'Eugenio, D. B. , & Moersch, M. S. (Eds.). (1981). Developmental programming for infants and young children (Vols. 4-5). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Doll, E. A. (1965). Vineland Social Maturity Scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Fewell, R. R. (1984). Assessment of preschool handicapped children. Educational Psychologist, 19, 172-179.

Love, H. D. (1985). Psychological evaluation of exceptional children. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

10.

McCarthy, D. A. (1972). Manual for the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

11.

McConkey, R. (1997). Intellectual disability: A psychological assessment. In R. Fuller , P. Noonan Walsh , & P. McGinley (Eds.), A century of psychology: Progress, paradigms and prospects for the new millennium (pp. 69-84). London: Routledge.

12.

Russell, D. , Rosenbaum, P. , Gowland, C. , Hardy, S. , Lane, M. , Plews, N. , McGavin, H. , Cadman, D. , & Jarvis, S. (1990). Gross Motor Function Measure manual. Hamilton, Ontario: Children's Developmental Rehabilitation Programme at Chedoke-McMaster Hospitals, Hugh MacMillan Rehabilitation Centre, McMaster University.

13.

Schafer, D. S. , & Moersch, M. S. (Eds.). (1981). Developmental programming for infants and young children (Vols. 1-3). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

14.

Sparrow, S. S. , Balla, D. A. , & Cicchetti, D. V. (1985). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Classroom Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

15.

Zimmerman, I. L. , Steiner, V. G. , & Pond, R. E. (1992). Preschool Language Scale-3: Examiner's manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.