This study examined the first-order factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III; Wechsler, 1991) on three samples of children previously diagnosed with a handicapping condition. Five alternative factor models were compared through confirmatory factor analysis. Previous factor analytic studies that focused on the WISC-III's four-factor solution employed all 13 subtests in their analyses, despite the fact that only 12 subtests are combined during clinical evaluations to obtain scores on the four factors. This study investigated the WISC-III factor structure by considering the 12 subtests that actually combine to yield index scores on the dimensions of Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Organization, Processing Speed, and Freedom from Distractibility. Results support a four-factor solution for children with disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, S. R., & Thorndike, R. M. (1995). Stability of the WPPSI-R and WISC-III factor structure using cross-validation of covariance structure models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 3-20.
2.
Bell, W. M. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition on children with learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State, Mississippi.
3.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-256.
4.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
6.
Brody, N. (1985). The validity of tests of intelligence. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 353-389). New York: Wiley.
7.
Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 52-81). New York: Guilford Press.
8.
Conger, A. J., Conger, J. C., Farrell, A. D., & Ward, D. (1979). What can the WISC-R measure?Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 421-436.
9.
Crano, W. D., Kenny, J., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Does intelligence cause achievement? A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 258-275.
10.
Dean, R. (1980). Factor structure of the WISC-R with Mexican-American children. Journal of School Psychology, 18, 234-239.
11.
Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). Psychophysiology and measurement of intelligence. In C. R. Reynolds & V. L. Wilson (Eds.), Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences (pp. 1-49). New York: Plenum Press.
12.
Feuerstein, R. (1985). The importance of the role of assessment in successful integration programs: A dynamic alternative to traditional psychometric approaches. Educational and Child Psychology, 2, 138-144.
13.
Glutting, J. J., Konold T. R., McDermott, P. A., Kush, J. C., & Watkins, M. W. (1995). Structure and associated characteristics of a normative subtest taxonomy for the WSC-III's standardization sample. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14.
Goh, D. S., Teslow, C. J., & Fuller, G. B. (1981). The practice of psychological assessment among school psychologists. Professional Psychology, 12, 696-706.
15.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Gutkin, T. B., & Reynolds, C. R. (1981). Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for White and Black children from the standardization sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 227-231.
17.
Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
19.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
20.
Juliana, J. M., Haddad, F. A., & Carroll, J. L. (1988). Three-year stability of WISC-R factor scores for Black and White, female and male children classified as learning disabled. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 317-325.
21.
Kaufman, A. S. (1994). A reply to Macmann and Barnett: Lessons from the blind men and the elephant. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 199-207.
22.
Kaufman, A. S. (1990). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
23.
Kaufman, A. S. (1975). Factor analysis of the WISC-R at eleven age levels between 6 and 16 years. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 43, 135-147.
24.
Keith, T. Z. (1994). Intelligence is important, intelligence is complex. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 209-221.
25.
Keith, T. Z., & Witta, E. L. (in press). Hierarchical and cross-age confirmatory factor analysis of the WISCIII: What does it measure?School Psychology Quarterly.
26.
Kush, J. C. (1996). Factor structure of the WISC-III for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 32-40.
27.
Logerquist-Hansen, S., & Barona, A. (1994). Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White children with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
28.
Lutey, C., & Copeland, E. P. (1982). Cognitive assessment of the schoolaged child. In C.R. Reynolds & T.B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 121-155). New York: John Wiley.
29.
Macmann, G. M., & Barnett, D. W. (1994). Structural analysis of correlated factors: Lessons from the Verbal-Performance dichotomy of the Wechsler Scales. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 161-197.
30.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
31.
Naglieri, J. A. (1981). Factor structure of the WISC-R for children identified as learning disabled. Psychological Reports, 49, 891-895.
32.
Reschly, D. (1978). WISC-R factor structure among Anglos, Blacks, Chicanos, and Native American Papagos. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 417-422.
33.
Reynolds, C. R., & Gutkin, T. B. (1980). Stability of the WISC-R factor structure across sex at two age levels. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 775-777.
34.
Reynolds, C. R., & Kaufman, A. S. (1990). Assessment of children's intelligence with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R). In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement. New York: Guilford.
35.
Roid, G. H., Prifitera, A., & Weiss, L. G. (1993). Replication of the WISC-III factor structure in an independent sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment WISC-HI Monograph, 6-21.
36.
Sapp, G. L., Chissom, B., & Graham, E. (1985). Factor analysis of the WISC-R for gifted students: A replication and comparison. Psychological Reports, 57, 947-951.
37.
Stinnett, T. A., Havey, J. M., & Oehler-Stinnett, J. (1994). Current test usage by practicing school psychologists: A national survey. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 331-350.
38.
Swanson, L. H. (1994). The role of working memory and dynamic assessment in the classification of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 190-202.
39.
Taylor, R. L., Ziegler, E. W., & Partenio, I. (1984). An investigation of WISC-R Verbal-Performance differences as a function of ethnic status. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 437-441.
40.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. (1959). The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford University Press.
41.
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
42.
Wechsler, D. (1974). WISC-R manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
43.
Wechsler, D. (1991). WISC-Ill manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
44.
Wilson, M. S., & Reschly, D. J. (1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25, 9-23.
45.
Witt, J. C. (Ed.). (1994). School Psychology Quarterly, 9(3).
46.
Woodcock, R. W. (1990). Theoretical foundations of the WJ-R measures of cognitive ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 231-258.
