This study examined the effects of WISC-III IQ changes on the IQ-achievement discrepancy required for special education eligibility in the area of Specific Learning Disabled. Within a sample of 224 students with learning disabilities, WISG-III scores were significantly lower when compared to WISC-R scores. No significant changes occurred in achievement scores as measured by the Woodcock-Johnson Revised and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. As a result, fewer children retested with the WISC-III qualified for LD services. This drop in eligibility rates was evidenced by both the simple difference and regression methods. The possibility that a significant number of students no longer qualify for LD services should raise concern among psychologists and educators alike. In response to these results, emphasis should be placed upon consultation and pre-assessment intervention designed to serve those students who may no longer qualify for services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47(12).
2.
Bennett, D., & Clarizio, H. (1988). A comparison of methods for calculating severe discrepancy. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 359-369.
3.
Braden, J. P., & Weiss, L. (1988). Effects of simple difference versus regression discrepancy methods: An empirical study. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 133-142.
4.
Clarizio, H. F., & Phillips, S. E. (1989). Defining severe discrepancy in the diagnosis of learning disabilities: A comparison of methods. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 383-391.
5.
Coles, S. G. (1978). The learning disability test battery: Empirical and social issues. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 313-340.
6.
Dumont, R., & Faro, C. (1993). The WISC-III: Almost two years old; proceeding with caution-practitioner's concerns. Communiqué, 21(7), 12-15.
7.
Evans, L. D. (1992). Multiple IQ-achievement comparisons: Effects on severe discrepancy determination. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 167-174.
8.
Evans, L. D. (1993). A comparison of the impact of regression and simple difference discrepancy models on identification rates. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 17-29.
9.
Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29-51.
10.
Hager, V. J. (1992). A study of WISC-III scores in 11-14-year-old learning disabled children. Unpublished master's thesis, James Madison University, Harrisburg, VA.
11.
Jensen, A. R. (1986). Methodological and statistical techniques for the chronometric study of mental abilities. In C. Reynolds & V. Willson (Eds.), Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences (pp. 51-116). New York: Plenum.
12.
Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley.
13.
Klein, E. S., & Fisher, G. S. (1993, April). WISC-R and WISC-III: A comparison of IQ, subtest, and factor/index scores. Paper presented at the National Association of School Psychologists Convention, Washington, DC.
14.
Kranzler, J. H., & Brownell, M. T. (1994). Implications of contemporary theories of intelligence for the assessment of learning disabilities. Assessment in Rehabilitation and Exceptionality, 1(2), 163-174.
15.
Mercer, C., Hughes, C., & Mercer, A. (1985). Learning disabilities definitions used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 45-55.
16.
Mercer, C., King-Sears, P., & Mercer, A. (1990). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 131-153.
17.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (1986). Rules and regulations for special education. Raleigh, NC: Author.
18.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (1993). Certified headcount for special education. Raleigh, NC: Author.
19.
Reschly, D. J. (1988). Special education reform: School psychology revolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 459-475.
20.
Reynolds, C. R. (1990). Conceptual and technical problems in learning disability diagnosis. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (pp. 571-592). New York: Guilford Press.
21.
Sattler, J. (1988). Assessment of children: Third edition. San Diego: Author.
22.
Skrtic, T. M. (1988). The organizational context of special education. In E. L. Meyen (Ed.), Exceptional children and youth: An introduction (pp. 479-518). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
23.
Smith, D. K., Stovall, D. L., & Geraghty, B. L. (1994, March). WISC-I1I/WJSC-R relationship in special education reevaluations. Paper presented at the National Association of School Psychologists Convention, Seattle, WA.
24.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Revised: Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
25.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Third edition: Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
26.
Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
27.
Weiss, L. G. (1995). WISC-III IQs: New norms raise queries: Part I. Assessment Focus, 1(2). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
28.
Weiss, L. G. (1996). WISC-III IQs: New norms raise queries: Part II. Assessment Focus, 2(1). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
29.
Williams, R. E. (1994). A comparison of the simple-difference and regression approaches in qualifying North Carolina LD children with IQ scares above and below the mean. Unpublished master's paper, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
30.
Woodcock, R. W. (1978). Development and standardization of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-educational Battery. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
