Evaluating Abridged Versions of the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices for Identifying Students with Academic Talent

Abstract

The Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) has been recommended as a useful measure for identifying academic potential. Several abridged versions of the test, including Set I, have been developed as shorter screening instruments, but they await systematic evaluation. Two hundred twenty-one academically talented students (62% males), who ranged from fifth to ninth grades, completed the APM Set I and Set II. In addition, two short forms of the APM were derived using a technique described by Arthur and Day (1994). Both of these short forms had psychometric properties that were superior to those of Set I of the APM and were correlated more strongly with the full APM than Set I. The psychometric properties of the derived short forms were examined with an independent sample of students (n = 247) and found to be comparable. In addition, scores from these short forms were correlated significantly (but moderately) with independent reasoning assessments used to identify academic talent. With appropriate caution, short forms of the APM may be a reasonable alternative to the full test as a quick screening measure for identifying potentially talented students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ablard, K. E., & Stumpf, H. (1995). The contribution of inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning, and spatial ability to mathematical reasoning ability. Unpublished manuscript.

Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed., p. 290). New York: Macmillan.

Arlin, P. K. (1984). Test manual: Arlin Test of Formal Reasoning. New York: Slosson Educational.

Arthur, Jr., W. , & Day, D. V. (1994). Development of a short-form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 394-403.

Baska, L. (1986). Alternatives to traditional testing. Roeper Review, 8, 181-184.

Benbow, C. P. , & Minor, L. L. (1990). Cognitive profiles of verbally and mathematically precocious students: Implications for identification of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 21-26.

Educational Testing Service (1987). Secondary School Admission Test Interpretive Guide: For school personnel and educational counselors. Princeton, NJ: Author.

Glass, G. V. , & Stanley, J. C. (1970). Statistical methods in education and psychology (pp. 308-310). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hakstian, A. R. , & Whalen, T. E. (1976). A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika, 41, 219-231.

10.

Hox, J. (1995). ALFA TEST [Computer Software]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

11.

Matthews, D. (1988). Raven's Matrices in the identification of giftedness. Roeper Review, 10, 159-162.

12.

Mills, C. J. , Ablard, K. E. , & Brody, L. E. (1993). The Raven's Progressive Matrices: Its usefulness for identifying gifted/talented students. Roeper Review, 15, 183-186.

13.

Mills, C. J. , & Tissot, S. L. (1995). Identifying academic potential in students from under-represented populations: Is using the Ravens Progressive Matrices a good idea? Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 209-217.

14.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

15.

Pearce, N. (1983). A comparison of the WISC-R, Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices, and Meeker's SOI-Screening Form for Gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 13-19.

16.

Ramos-Ford, V. , & Gardner, H. (1991). Giftedness from a multiple intelligence perspective. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis, Handbook of gifted education (pp. 55-64). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

17.

Raven, J. (1990). Raven manual research supplement 3: American and international norms - neuropsychological uses. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

18.

Raven, J. C. , Court, J. H. , & Raven, J. (1983). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and vocabulary scales, section 4: Advanced Progressive Matrices, Sets I and II. London: H. K. Lewis.

19.

Richert, E. S. (1985). Identification of gifted students: An update. Roeper Review, 8, 68-72.

20.

Stanley, J. C. (1974). Intellectual precocity. In J. C. Stanley , D. P. Keating , & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

21.

Sternberg, R. J. (1991). Giftedness according to the triarchic theory of human intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 45-54). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

22.

Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection, test and measurement methods. New York: John Wiley.