Braden, J. (Ed.) (1990). Experimental methods for assessing intelligence. School Psychology Review, 19, 4.
2.
Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment. An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. In collaboration with Y. Rand, M. Hoffman, & R. Miller. Baltimore: University Park Press.
3.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performer. The Learning Potential Assessment Device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
4.
Frisby, C., & Braden, J. (1992). Feuerstein's dynamic assessment approach: A semantic, logical, and empirical critique. Journal of Special Education, 26, 281-301.
5.
Haywood, C. (Ed.) (1992). Special Issue: Interactive assessment. Journal of Special Education, 26, 3.
6.
Haywood, C., & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.) (1992). Interactive assessment. New York: Springer.
7.
Jitendra, A., & Kameenui, E. (1993). Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assessment approach: A description and analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 6-18.
8.
Korchin, S., & Schuldberg, D. (1981). The future of clinical assessment. American Psychologist, 36, 1147-1158.
9.
Lidz, C. (Ed.) (1987). Dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
10.
Naglieri, J., & Das, J. (1988). Planning-arousal-simultaneous-successive (PASS): A model for assessment. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 35-48.
11.
Reschly, D., & Wilson, M. (1990). Cognitive processing versus traditional intelligence: Diagnostic utility, intervention implications, and treatment validity. School Psychology Review, 19, 443-458.
12.
Reynolds, C. (1986). Transactional models of intellectual development, yes. Deficit models of process remediation, no. School Psychology Review, 15, 256-260.