The search for psychometrically sound instruments that can help determine family needs, concerns, and priorities has been accompanied by an equally significant search for effective methods that can evaluate the usefulness of these types of instruments. While standard techniques provide some indication of psychometric efficacy, it is only through less conventional methods of assessing validity and reliability that the true effectiveness of family needs surveys can be determined. In this paper, we review standard methods for assessing the utility of family needs surveys, suggest alternative strategies, and discuss the specific questions of utility that alternative strategies address.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abidin, R. R. (1986). Parenting Stress Index. Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.
2.
Bailey, D. B., Jr. (1991). Issues and perspectives on family assessment. Infants and Young Children, 4, 26-34.
3.
Bailey, D. B., Jr., & Blasco, P. M. (1990). Parents' perspectives on a written survey of family needs. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 196-203.
4.
Bailey, D. B., Jr., Blasco, P. M., & Simeonsson, R. J. (1992). Needs expressed by mothers and fathers of young children with disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 1-10.
5.
Bailey, D. B., Jr., & Henderson, L. W. (in press). Traditions in family assessment: Toward an inquiry-oriented, reflective model. In D. M. Bryant & M. A. Graham (Eds.), Implementing early intervention. From research to best practice.
6.
Bailey, D. B., Jr., & Simeonsson, R. J. (1988). Assessing needs of families with handicapped infants. Journal of Special Education, 22, 117-127.
7.
Bailey, D. B., Simeonsson, R. J., Isbell, P., Huntington, G. S., Winton, P. J., Comfort, M., & Helm, J. (1988). Inservice training in family assessment and goal-setting for early interventionists. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12, 126-136.
8.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage University Paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
D'Amato, E., & Yoshida, R. K. (1991). Parental needs: An educational life cycle perspective. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 246-254.
10.
Deal, A. G., Trivette, C. M., & Dunst, C. J. (1988). Family functioning style scale. In C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette, & A. G. Deal (Eds.), Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice (pp. 179-184). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
11.
Dunst, C. J., Cooper, C. S., Weeldreyer, J. C., Snyder, K. D., & Chase, J. H. (1988). Family needs scale. In C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette, & A. G. Deal (Eds.), Enabling and empowering families. Principles and guidelines for practice (p. 151). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
12.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1988). Enabling and empowering families. Principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
13.
Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Social validity: A note on methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 235-240.
14.
Garshelis, J. A. & McConnell, S. R. (in press). Comparison of family needs assessed by mothers, individual professionals, and interdisciplinary teams. Journal of Early Intervention.
15.
Geller, E. S. (1991). Where's the validity in social validity?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 179-184.
16.
Hawkins, R. P. (1991). Is social validity what we are interested in? Argument for a functional approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 205-213.
17.
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Sage University Paper series on qualitative research methods, Volume 1.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
McCloskey, G. (1990). Selecting and using early childhood rating scales. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 39-64.
19.
McGrew, K. S., Gilman, C. J., & Johnson, S. (1992). A review of scales to assess family needs. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 10, 4-25.
20.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 180-204.
22.
Sexton, D., Bunell, B., & Thompson, B. (in press). Measurement integrity of the Family Needs Survey. Journal of Early Intervention.
23.
Sexton, D., Snyder, P., Rheams, T., Barron-Sharp, B., & Perez, J. (1991). Considerations in using written surveys to identify family strengths and needs during the IFSP process. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, 81-91.
24.
Summers, J. A., Dell'Oliver, C., Turnbull, A. P., Benson, H. A., Santelli, E., Campbell, M., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1990). Examining the Individualized Family Service Plan process: What are family and practitioner preferences?Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10, 78-99.
25.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
26.
Zemke, R., & Kramlinger, T. (1982). Figuring things out: A trainer's guide to needs and task analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
