Children with dyslexia were identified and subtyped by two testing methods, word attack and analysis of spelling errors. A phonologically impaired group (n = 54) and an orthographically impaired group (n = 20) were selected from a mid-elementary-school-level referred population for an intervention program. The subtype diagnostic methods were validated by a double dissociation between the groups on a variety of independent measures of phonological and orthographic processing. Phonologically impaired children with dyslexia showed poorer higher-order phonics processing skills, such as sound integration, than did orthographically impaired children with dyslexia. The groups did not differ on lower-order phonics processing skills, such as rhyming or segmentation. Orthographically impaired children showed poorer recognition of nonwords and slower reading speed than did phonologically impaired children. These subtype diagnostic methods can provide clinically important information about dyslexic children's mental processing strengths and weaknesses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, P. A. (1984). Enlarging the gap between theory and practice: A review of the Boder Test of Reading-Spelling Patterns. School Psychology Review, 13, 529-533.
2.
Ball, E., & Blachman, B. (1991). Does phoneme segmentation training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 49-66.
3.
Bing, S. B. (1985). A review of the Boder Test of Reading-Spelling Patterns: A diagnostic screening test for subtypes of reading disability. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 488-489.
4.
Boder, E., & Jarrico, S. (1982). The Boder Test of Reading-Spelling Patterns: A diagnostic screening test for subtypes of reading disability. New York: Grune & Stratton.
5.
Chase, C. H., & Tallal, P. (1991). Cognitive models of developmental reading disorders. In J. E. Obrzut & G. W. Hynd (Eds.), Neuropsychological foundations of learning disabilities (pp. 199-240). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Flynn, J. M., & Deering, W. M. (1989). Subtypes of dyslexia: Investigation of Boder's system using quantitative neurophysiology. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31, 215-223.
7.
Flynn, J. M., Deering, W. M., Goldstein, M., & Rahbar, M. H. (1992). Electrophysical correlates of dyslexic subtypes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 133-141.
8.
Frankenberger, W., & Fronzaglio, K. (1991). A review of states' criteria and procedures of identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495-500.
9.
Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1985). How to increase reading ability. New York: Longman.
10.
Hooper, S. R., & Willis, W. G. (1989). Learning disability subtyping: Neuropsychological foundations, conceptual models, and issues in clinical differentiation. New York: Springer.
11.
Juel, C., Griffith, P., & Gaugh, P. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243-255.
12.
Lenchner, O., Gerber, M. M., & Routh, D. K. (1990). Phonological awareness tasks as predictors of decoding ability: Beyond segmentation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 240-247.
Lindamood, C. H., & Lindamood, P. C. (1971). Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test. Boston: Reading Resources.
15.
Lovett, M. W. (1987). A developmental approach to reading disability: Accuracy and speed criteria of normal and deficient reading skill. Child Development, 58, 234-260.
16.
Lovett, M. W., Ransby, M. J., & Barron, R. W. (1988). Treatment, subtype, and word type effects in dyslexic children's response to remediation. Brain and Language, 34, 328-349.
17.
Lovett, M. W., Ransby, M. J., Hardwick, N., & Johns, M. S. (1989). Can dyslexia be treated? Treatment-specific and generalized treatment effects in dyslexic children's response to remediation. Brain and Language, 37, 90-121.
18.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263-284.
19.
Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159-173.
20.
Lyon, G. R. (1985). Educational validation of learning disability subtypes. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Essentials of subtype analysis (pp. 228-256). New York: Guilford Press.
21.
Lyon, G. R., & Flynn, J. M. (1989). Assessing subtypes of learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson (Ed.), Handbook on the assessment of learning disabilities: Theory, research, and practice. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
22.
Lyon, G. R., Stewart, N., & Freedman, D. (1982). Neuropsychological characteristics of empirically derived subgroups of learning disabled readers. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 343-365.
23.
Morris, R., Blashfield, R. K., & Satz, P. (1986). Developmental classification of reading-disabled children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 371-392.
24.
Morris, R., Satz, P., & Blashfield, R. K. (1981). Neuropsychology and cluster analysis: Potentials and problems. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 77-79.
25.
Newby, R. F., & Lyon, G. R. (1991). Neuropsychological subtypes of learning disabilities. In J. E. Obrzut & G. W. Hynd (Eds.), Neuropsychological foundations of learning disabilities: A handbook of issues, methods, and practice (pp. 355-386). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
Newby, R. F., Recht, D. R., & Caldwell, J. (in press). Empirically tested interventions for subtypes of reading disabilities. In M. G. Tramontana & S. R. Hooper (Eds.), Advances in child neuropsychology (Vol. 2). New York: Springer.
27.
Olson, R. K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B. J., & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In G. E. MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 1-64). New York: Academic Press.
28.
Reynolds, C. R. (1984). Psychometric characteristics of the Boder Test of Reading-Spelling Patterns: Take one giant step backwards. School Psychology Review, 13, 526-529.
29.
Rosner, J., & Simon, D. (1971). The Auditory Analysis Test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384-392.
30.
Rourke, B. P. (1985). Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Essentials of subtype analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
31.
Rutter, M. (1978). Prevalence and types of dyslexia. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia An appraisal of current knowledge(pp. 3-28). New York. Oxford University Press.
32.
Sawyer, D. (1987). Test of Awareness of Language Segments. Rockville, MA: Aspen.
33.
Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469-478.
34.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
35.
Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-612.
36.
Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 7-29.
37.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175-190.
38.
Torgesen, J. K. (1988). Studies of children with learning disabilities who perform poorly on memory span tasks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 605-612.
39.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
40.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manualfor the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
41.
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159-177.
