The underlying constructs of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery for Older Children (HRNB-C; Reitan, 1969) were examined for a large sample of learning-disabled children. Scores on the HRNB-C, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, and the Wide Range Achievement Test were factor analyzed separately for 9- to 10-year-olds, 11- to 12-year-olds, and 13- to 14-year-olds and then the overall group. Like factors were identified across age levels and compared using coefficients of congruence. A six-factor solution emerged for the 9- to 10-year-old group, whereas a seven-factor solution was interpreted for the older groups. Factors appeared to represent Simple Motor Skills, Visually Guided Motor Activities, Verbal Organization and Verbal Concept Formation, Symbolic Langauge Integration, Spatial Organization, and Integration across age. Factors that related to Visual-Spatial Organization and Spatial Memory were less stable. These data were interpreted as suggesting an increase in complexity of neuropsychological functioning with age.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakker, D. J. (1979). Hemispheric differences and reading strategies: Two dyslexias?Bulletin of the Orton Society, 29, 84-100.
2.
Batchelor, E. S. (in press). Implications of laterality in childhood learning disorders. In R. S. Dean & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Assessment of laterality: Issues, techniques and implications. New York: Plenum Press.
3.
Batchelor, E. S., & Dean, R. S. (1989). Lexical integration in children with learning disabilities. Paper submitted for publication.
4.
Batchelor, E. S., Dean, R. S., & Harding, J. (1990, August). Empirical derivation and classification of children with learning disorders at separate age levels. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
5.
Batchelor, E. S., Gray, J. W., & Dean, R. S. (in press a). Empirical testing of a cognitive model to account for neuropsychological performance in arithmetic problem solving. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
6.
Batchelor, E. S., Gray, J. W., & Dean, R. S. (in press b). Neuropsychological aspects of arithmetic performance in children with learning disability. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology.
7.
Batchelor, E. S., Kixmiller, J., & Dean, R. S. (in press). Neuropsychological aspects of reading and spelling performance in children with learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 6, 183-193.
8.
Beaumont, J. G., & Rugg, M. D. (1978). Neuropsychological laterality of function and dyslexia: A new hypothesis. Dyslexia Review, 1, 18-21.
9.
Boll, T. J. (1981). The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery. In S. B. Friskov & T. J. Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 577-607). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
10.
Burt, C. L. (1948). The factorial study of temperamental traits. British Journal of Psychology, 1, 178-203.
11.
Crockett, D., Klonoff, H., & Bjerring, J. (1969). Factor analysis of neuropsychological tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 29, 791-802.
12.
D'Amato, R. C., Gray, J. W., & Dean, R. S. (1988). A comparison between intelligence and neuropsychological functioning. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 283-292.
13.
Dean, R. S. (1985). Foundation and rationale for neuropsychological bases of individual differences. In L. C. Hartlage & C. F. Telzrow (Eds.), The neuropsychology of individual differences: A development perspective (pp. 1-16). New York: Plenum.
14.
Dean, R. S. (1986). Perspectives on the future of neuropsychological assessment. In B. S. Blake & J. C. Witt (Eds.), Buros-Nebraska series on measurement and testing: Future of testing and measurement (pp. 203-244). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Dean, R. S., Schwartz, N. H., & Smith, L. S. (1981). Lateral preference patterns as a discriminator of learning difficulties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 227-235.
16.
Fischer, W. E., D'Amato, R. C., Gray, J. W., & Dean, R. S. (1987, August). The WISC-R and Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery: A comparative study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
17.
Fisk, J. L., & Rourke, B. P. (1979). Identification of subtypes of learning-disabled children at three age levels: A neurological multivariate approach. Journal of Clinical Neurology, 1, 289-310.
18.
Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Rourke, B. P. (1988). Discriminant validity of lateral sensorimotor tests in children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 779-799.
19.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Halstead, W. C. (1947). Brain and intelligence. Chicago: University Press.
21.
Jarvis, P., & Barth, J. (1984). Halstead-Reitan Test Battery: An interpretive guide. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
22.
Jastak, J., & Jastak, S. (1978). Wide Range Achievement Test manual. Wilmington, DE: Guidance Associates.
23.
Kaufman, A. S. (1979). WISC-R research: Implications for interpretation. School Psyhology Digest, 8, 5-27.
24.
Klonoff, H. (1971). Factor analysis of a neuropsychological battery for children aged 9 to 15. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32, 603-616.
25.
Klonoff, H., Robinson, G. C., & Thompson, G. (1969). Acute and chronic brain syndromes in children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 11, 198-213.
26.
Knights, R. M., & Norwood, J. A. (1980). Revised smoothed normative data on the Neuropsychological Battery for Children. Unpublished manuscript, Carlton University, Ottawa.
27.
Morris, R., Blashfield, R., & Satz, P. (1986). Developmental classification of reading-disabled children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 371-392.
28.
Reitan, R. M. (1962). Psychological deficit. Annual Review of Psychology, 13, 415-444.
29.
Reitan, R. M. (1969). Manual for administration of neuropsychological test batteries for adults and children. Indianapolis: Author.
30.
Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1988, August). Neuropsychological functions of learning-disabled, brain-damaged, and normal children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta.
31.
Rourke, B. P. (1978). Reading, spelling, arithmetic disabilities: A neuropsychologic perspective. In H. R. Myklebust (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (pp. 97-120). New York: Grune & Stratton.
32.
Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied factor analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
33.
Russell, E. W. (1982). Factor analysis of the revised Weschler Memory Scale tests in a neuropsychological battery. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 971-974.
34.
Russell, E. W., Neuringer, C., & Goldstein, G. (1970). Assessment of brain damage: A neuropsychological key approach. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
35.
Satz, P., Fletcher, J. M., Clark, W., & Morris, R. (1981). Lag deficit, rate and delay constructs in specific learning disabilities: A re-examination. In A. Ansara, N. Geschwind, A. Galaburda, M. Albert, & N. Gartell (Eds.), Sex differences in dyslexia (pp. 109-141). Washington: Orton Dyslexia Society.
36.
Satz, P., Taylor, G., Friel, J., & Fletcher, J. H. (1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disabilities: A six year follow-up. In A. L. Benton & D. Pearl (Eds.) Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 315-347). New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Selz, M., & Reitan, R. M. (1979). Rules for neuropsychological diagnosis: Classification of brain function in older children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 258-264.
38.
Spreen, O., & Haaf, R. G. (1986). Empirically derived learning disability subtypes: A replication attempt and longitudinal patterns over 15 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 170-180.
39.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
40.
Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41.
Strang, J. D., & Rouke, B. P. (1983). Concept formation/nonverbal reasoning abilities of children who exhibit specific academic problems with arithmetic. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12, 33-39.
42.
Swiercinsky, D. P., & Hallenbeck, C. E. (1975). A factorial approach to neuropsychological assessment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 610-618.
43.
Swiercinsky, D. P., & Howard, M. E. (1982). Programmatic series of factor analyses for evaluating the structure of neuropsychological test batteries. Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 147-152.
44.
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel Research Section Report No. 984. Washington: Department of the Army.
45.
Wechsler, D. L. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
46.
Wheeler, L., Burke, C. J., & Reitan, R. M. (1963). An application of discriminant function to the problem of predicting brain damage using behavioral variables. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 16, 417-440.
47.
Williams, R., Batchelor, E. S., & Dean, R. S. (1989). The neuropsychological significance of lateral preference for complex visual activities in children with learning disorders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, Washington.
48.
Wrigley, C. S., & Neuhaus, J. O. (1955). The matching of two sets of factors. American Psychologist, 10, 418-419.
