The implementation of P.L. 99-457 requires the identification of appropriate instruments for use in making program eligibility decisions for infants, toddlers, and preschool children. One test that has been recommended for this purpose is the Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI; Newborg, Stock, Wnek, Guidubaldi, & Svinicki, 1984). This paper provides a review of the technical characteristics of the BDI that would support its use for this purpose. Information presented in the test manual on standardization, reliability, and validity of the BDI suggests that its use as a normative measure for purposes of determining program eligibility is not supported.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, D. B., Jr., Vandiviere, P., Dellinger, J., & Munn, D. (1987). The Battelle Developmental Inventory: teacher perceptions and implementation data. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 3, 217-226.
2.
Bracken, B. A. (1987). Limitations of preschool instruments and standards for minimal levels of technical adequacy. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 313-326.
3.
Brooks-Gunn, J., & Lewis, M. (1983). Screening and diagnosing handicapped infants. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3, 14-28.
4.
Doll, E. A. (1965). Vineland Social Maturity Scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
5.
Dubose, R. F., & Langley, B. (1977). The Developmental Activities Screening Inventory. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources.
6.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7.
Gorelick, M. C., & Sandhu, M. (1967). Parent perception of the retarded child's intelligence. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 40, 382-384.
8.
Gradel, K., Thompson, M. S., & Sheehan, R. (1981). Parental and professional agreement in early childhood assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1, 31-39.
9.
Hambleton, R. K. (1982). Advances in criterion-referenced testing technology. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 351-379). New York: John Wiley.
10.
McLean, M., McCormick, K., Bruder, M. B., & Burdg, N. B. (1987). An investigation of the validity and reliability of the Battelle Developmental Inventory with a population of children younger than 30 months with identified handicapping conditions. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 11, 238-246.
11.
Mott, S. E. (1987). Concurrent validity of the Battelle Developmental Inventory for speech and language disordered children. Psychology in the Schools, 24, 215-220.
Newman, I., & Guidubaldi, J. (1981). Factor validity estimate of the Battelle Developmental Inventory for three age groups. Paper presented at the conference of the National Association of School Psychologists, Houston, TX.
14.
Pezzino, J., Mott, S. E., & Waidler, J. (1986). The concurrent validity of the Battelle Developmental Inventory. Unpublished manuscript, Utah State University, Early Intervention Research Institute, Logan, UT.
15.
Schakel, J. A. (1986). Cognitive assessment of preschool children. School Psychology Review, 15, 200-215.
16.
Shonkoff, J. P. (1983). The limitations of normative assessment of high-risk infants. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3, 29-43.
