Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigated the usefulness of the MAT-SF and the DAP: A Quantitative Scoring System as screening instruments. In this study, 44 regular and 33 LD classroom fourth- and fifth- grade students were group administered the screening tests and individually administered the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement. The results found both groups to score within the average range on both screening tests and the LD group to score significantly lower on the achieve ment than on the two screening tests. The MAT-SF was found to correlate significantly with all areas of achievement for the normal group. The DAP did not correlate significantly with any areas for the normal group; it correlated significantly with reading, but not math, for the learning- disabled students. The results indicated that the MAT-SF may have more utility as a general screening instrument than does the DAP.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Anderson, K.M. (1987). Concurrent validity of the Matrix Analogies-Expanded Form, WISC-R, and PPTV-R with children identified as gifted. Unpublished master's thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

Bardos, A.N. , & Naglieri, J.A. (1987). MAT-EF, KABC, DAP, & PPVT-R with normal students: A divergent aalidity study. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Bracken, B.A. (1987). Limitations of preschool instruments and standards for minimal levels of technical adequacy. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 313-326.

Carter, J.L. (1973). Human figure drawing of mentally retarded, brain injured, and normal children. Art Psychotherapy , 1, 307-308.

Colligan, R. (1967). Learning inhibitions in children related to their human figures drawings. Psychology in the Schools , 4, 328-330.

Dunn, J.A. (1967). Validity coefficients for the new Harris-Goodenough Draw-A-Man Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 24, 200-301.

Ferguson, G. (1976). Statistical analysis in psychology and education . New York: McGraw-Hill .

Flynn, J.R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin , 101, 171-191.

10.

Harris, D. (1963). Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.

11.

Howell, K.W. , Zucker, S.H. , & Morehead, M.K. , (1985). Multilevel Academic Survey Test. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

12.

Kaufman, A.S. , & Kaufman, N.L. (1985). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement . Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

13.

Naglieri, J.A. (1985a). Matrix Analogies Test-Short Form. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation .

14.

Naglieri, J.A. (1985b). Matrix Analogies Test-Expanded Form . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation .

15.

Naglieri, J.A. , & Bardos, A.N. (1987). Use of the MAT-EF, WISC-R, MAT-EF, and PPVT-R . Manuscript submitted for publication.

16.

Ohio Department of Education. (1982). Rules for the education of handicapped children. Worthington, OH: Author.

17.

Pihl, R.O. , & Nimrod, G. (1976). The reliability and validity of the Draw-A-Person Test in IQ and personality assessment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 470-472.

18.

Prewett, P.N. , Bardos, A.N. , & Naglieri, J.A. (1988). Assessment of mentally retarded children with the Matrix Analogies Test-Short Form, Draw A Person: A Quantitative Scoring System, and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement . Manuscript submitted for publication.

19.

Raven, J.C. (1986). Standard progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.

20.

Sattler, J.M. (1982). Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities (2nd ed.). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.

21.

Scott, L.H. (1981). Measuring intelligence with the Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 483-505.

22.

Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

23.

Thorndike, R. (1949). Personnel Selection. New York: John Wiley.

Use of the Matrix Analogies Test-Short Form and the Draw a Person: a Quantitative Scoring System With Learning-Disabled and Normal Students

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References