Abstract
Bender-Gestalt error scores were cluster analyzed for a large group of children and adolescents evaluated because of learning difficulties. The results indicated two subgroups; one had a relatively high percentage of Bender-Gestalt errors, while the other had a relatively low percentage of Bender-Gestalt errors. The subgroups were compared on medical, developmental and growth, social, and intelligence variables. Several significant differences were found, particularly on developmental variables. Results are discussed in terms of the clinical utility of Bender-Gestalt error scores and in relation to developmental neuropsychological theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
