Teachers have certain expectations or standards for children's social behavior in mainstream classrooms. The purpose of the present study was to document regular education teachers' social behavior standards for a sample (N = 250) of mildly handicapped (LD, BD, and MR) and nonhandicapped students matched on sex and race. Using the teacher version of the Social Skills Rating Scale (SSRS-T), 125 teachers rated the importance of 50 objectively described social behaviors. Results of the teachers' ratings indicated that they valued academic-related social behaviors as more important to classroom functioning than peer-to-peer interaction behaviors. High rater agreement, as measured by rank-order correlations, was demonstrated between Black and White teachers (rho = .96) and male and female students (rho = .93). Rank-order correlations between each handicapped subsample and matched nonhandicapped subsamples were also high (rho ranged from .91 to .98). Thus, teachers' ratings of importance did not vary much as a function of student race, sex, or classification. These findings are discussed in the context of a “model behavior profile” expected for students in classrooms and the appropriate selection of target behaviors for intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1970). The entry into natural communities of reinforcement. In R. Ulrich, T. Stachnik, &J. Mabry (Eds.), Control of human behavior: Vol. 2: From cure to prevention (pp. 319-324). Glenville, IL: Scott, Foresman.
2.
Bryan, T., & Bryan, J. (1978). Social interactions of learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 33-38.
3.
Bursuck, W., & Asher, S. R. (1986). The relationship between social competence and achievement in elementary school children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 15, 41-49.
4.
Clark, L., Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Development and validation of a social skills assessment measure: The TROSS-C. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 347-356.
5.
Cobb, J., & Hops, H. (1973). Effects of academic survival skill training on low achieving first graders. Journal of Educational Research, 67, 108-113.
6.
Elliott, S. N., Gresham, F. M., & Freeman, T. (1987, March). Teacher and observer ratings of children's social skills over time: Validation of the Social Skills Rating Scales. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, New Orleans.
7.
Gerber, M., & Semmel, M. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137-148.
8.
Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1978). Looking into classrooms. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
Gottlieb, J. (1981). Mainstreaming: Fullfilling the promise. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 115-126.
10.
Gottlieb, J., Semmel, M., & Veldman, D. (1978). Correlates of social status among mainstreamed mentally retarded. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 396-405.
11.
Green, K., Forehand, R., Beck, S., & Vosk, B. (1980). An assessment of the relationship among measures of children's social competence and children's academic achievement. Child Development, 51, 1149-1156.
12.
Gresham, F. M. (1981). Social skills training with handicapped children: A review. Review of Educational Research, 51, 139-176.
13.
Gresham, F. M. (1982). Misguided mainstreaming: The case for social skills training with handicapped children. Exceptional Children, 48, 420-433.
14.
Gresham, F. M. (1983). Social validity in the assessment of children's social skills: Establishing standards for social competency. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 1, 297-307.
15.
Gresham, F. M. (1986). Strategies for enhancing the social outcomes of mainstreaming: A necessary ingredient for success. In J. Meisel (Ed.), The consequences of mainstreaming handicapped children (pp. 181-192). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (in preparation). Social Skills Rating Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
17.
Gresham, F. M., Elliott, S. N., & Black, F. L. (1987a). Teacher-rated social skills of mainstreamed mildly handicapped and nonhandicapped children. School Psychology Review, 16, 78-88.
18.
Gresham, F. M., Elliott, S. N., & Black, F. L. (1987b). Factor structure replication and bias investigation of the Teacher Rating of Social Skills. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 81-92.
19.
Gresham, F. M., & Reschly, D. J. (1986). Social skill deficits and low peer acceptance of mainstreamed learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 23-32.
20.
Hersh, R. H., & Walker, H. M. (1983). Great expectations: Making schools effective for all students. Policy Studies Review, 2, 147-188.
21.
Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427-451.
22.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Symptom substitution, generalization, and response covariation: Implications for psychotherapy outcome. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 349-365.
23.
Lambert, N. (1976). Children's problems and classroom interventions from the perspective of classroom teachers. Professional Psychology, 7, 507-517.
24.
Madden, N., & Slavin, R. (1983). Mainstreaming students with mild handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 58, 519-569.
25.
Martens, B. K., & Witt, J. C. (in press). Ecological behavior analysis. In M. Hersen, R. Eisler, & P. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification. New York: Academic Press.
26.
Morrison, G., Forness, S., & MacMillian, D. (1983). Influences on the sociometric ratings of mildly handicapped children: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 63-74.
27.
Reschly, D. J. (1982). Assessing mild mental retardation: The influence of adaptive behavior, sociocultural status, and prospects for nonbiased assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), Handbook of school psychology (pp. 209-242). New York: Wiley Interscience.
28.
Rosenshine, R. V. (1981). Academic engaged time, content covered, and direct instruction. Journal of Education, 3, 38-66.
29.
Semmel, M., Gottlieb, J., & Robinson (1979). Mainstreaming: Perspectives on educating handicapped children in public schools. In D. Berliner (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 7, 223-279.
30.
Slate, J., & Saudargas, R. (1986). Differences in learning disabled and average students' classroom behaviors. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 61-68.
31.
Stephens, T. M. (1978). Social skills in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Cedars Press.
32.
Stumme, V., Gresham, F. M., & Scott, N. (1982). Validity of Social Behavior Assessment in discriminating emotionally disabled from nonhandicapped students. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 4, 327-342.
33.
Voeltz, L., & Evans, I. (1982). The assessment of behavioral interrelationships in child behavior therapy. Behavioral Assessment, 4, 131-166.
34.
Wahler, R. G. (1975). Some structural aspects of deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 27-42.
35.
Wahler, R. G., & Fox, J. J. (1981). Setting events in applied behavior analysis: Toward a conceptual and methodological expansion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 327-338.
36.
Walker, H. M. (1976). Manual for the Walker Problem Behavior Identification Checklist. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
37.
Walker, H. M., & Rankin, R. (1983). Assessing the behavioral expectations and demands of less restrictive settings. School Psychology Review, 12, 274-284.
38.
Winnett, R., & Winkler, R. (1972). Current behavior modification in the classroom: Be still, be quiet, be docile. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 499-504.
39.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
