Students' Acceptability Ratings of Interventions for Classroom Misbehaviors: a Study of Well-Behaving and Misbehaving Youth

Abstract

Fifth-, seventh-, and ninth-grade students (N = 151) completed the Children's Intervention Rating Profile (CIRP) in response to four teacher-initiated intervention methods (home-based praise, home-based reprimand, public praise, and public reprimand) to correct classroom behavior problems. In addition, each student's teacher rated a student's general behavior. When examining the intervention preferences of students at each grade level, several trends in the acceptability of intervention methods were evident. Specifically, (1) fifth graders preferred positively oriented interventions more than negatively oriented interventions, (2) seventh and ninth graders preferred home-based interventions more than school-based interventions, and (3) only ninth graders indicated a sensitivity to selecting intervention methods based upon the problematic student's sex and the teachers' rating of the students' overall behaviors. The results are discussed within the context of previous treatment acceptabilty research and highlight the importance for acceptability research to include more background variables concerning both the raters and the target child.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Elliott, S.N. (1986). Children's ratings of the acceptability of classroom interventions for misbehavior: Findings and methodological considerations . Journal of School Psychology, 24, 23-35.

Elliott, S.N. , Witt, J.C. , Galvin, G. , & Moe, G. (1986). Acceptability of classroom interventions: Children's perspectives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 14, 1-6.

Elliott, S.N. , Witt, J.C. , Galvin, G. , & Peterson, R. (1984). Acceptability of positive and reductive interventions: Factors that influence teachers' decisions. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 353-360.

Kazdin, A.E. (1980). Acceptability of time out from reinforcement procedures for disruptive child behavior. Behavior Therapy, 11, 329-344.

Kazdin, A.E. (1981). Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects. Behavior Therapy, 12, 493-506.

Kazdin, A.E. , French, N.H. , & Sherick, R.B. (1981). Acceptability of alternative treatments for children: Evaluations by inpatient children, parents, and staff. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 900-907.

Martens, B.K. , Witt, J.C. , Elliott, S.N. , & Darveaux, D.X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 191-198.

Melton, G.B. (1981). Children's participation in treatment planning: Psychological and legal issues. Professional Psychology, 12, 246-252.

Ross, A.O. (1980). Psychological disorders of children: A behavioral approach to theory, research, and therapy (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Taylor, L. , Adelman, H.S. , & Kaser-Boyd, N. (1984). Attitudes toward involving minors in decisions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 436-499.

11.

Turco, T.L. , & Elliott, S.N. (in press). Assessment of students' acceptability of teacher-initiated interventions for classroom misbehaviors. Journal of School Psychology.

12.

Turco, T.L. , Elliot, S.N. , & Witt, J.C. (in press). Children's involvement in treatment selection: A review of theory and analogue research on treatment acceptability. Monograph on Secondary Behavior Disorders. Reston, VA: CEC.

13.

Witt, J.C. , & Elliott, S.N. (1983). Children's Intervention Rating Profile. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.

14.

Witt, J.C. , & Elliott, S.N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies . In T R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology: Vol. 4. (pp. 251-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .

15.

Witt, J.C. , Elliott, S.N. , & Martens, B.K. (1984). Acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms: The influence of teacher time, severity of behavioral problem, and type of intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 95-104.

16.

Witt, J.C. , Martens, B.K. , & Elliott, S.N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers' judgments of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204-209.

17.

Wolf, M.M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.