Futile Gestures: A Reply to Courtney,Hayes,Couch,and Frick Regarding Pantomimed Administration of the WISC-R Performance Scale

Abstract

A recent report describing pantomimed administration of the WISC-R Performance Scale (WISC-R PS) to hearing-impaired (HI) children (Courtney, Hayes, Couch, & Frick, 1984) suggests that psychologists may use pantomimed administration procedures for assessing the intellectual potential of HI children. A critical review of the results and reasoning of Courtney et al. does not support this conclusion. Specifically, the interpretation of Courtney et al. that lower WISC-R PS subtest means are due to sampling procedures is contradicted by other studies demonstrating that lower subtest means are due to pantomimed administration. Most important, the suggestion that HI children may be assessed using pantomimed directions contradicts recommended practices, abrogates HI children's legal rights, and violates ethical psychological practice. Assessment procedures for psychologists lacking communication skills and expertise in deafness are presented as alternatives to pantomimed administration of the WISC-R PS.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, R. J. , & Sisco, F. H. (1977). Standardization of the WISC-R Performance Scale for deaf children (Office of Demographic Studies Publication Series T, No. 1). Washington, DC: Gallaudet College.

Braden, J. P. (1984). The factorial similarity of the WISC-R Performance Scale in deaf and hearing samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 403-410.

Courtney, A. S. , Hayes, F. B. , Couch, K. W. , & Frick, M. (1984). Administration of the WISC-R Performance Scale to hearing-impaired children using pantomimed instructions. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2, 1-7.

Graham, E. E. , & Shapiro, E. (1953). Use of the Performance Scale of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children with the deaf child. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 17, 396-398.

Hiskey, M.S. (1966). Hiskey-Nebraska Test of Learning Aptitude. Lincoln, NB: College View Printers.

Jensen, A. R. (in press). The nature of the white-black difference on various psychometric tests. Brain and Behavior.

Jensen, A. R. , & Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Race, social class, and ability patterns on the WISC-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 423-438.

Levine, E. S. (1974). Psychological tests and practices with the deaf: A survey and state of the art. Volta Review, 76, 298-319.

Ray, S. (1979). An adaptation of the “Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children-Revised” for the deaf. Natchitoches, LA: S. Ray.

10.

Ray, S. (1982). Adapting the WISC-R for deaf children. Diagnostique, 7, 147-157.

11.

Spragins, A. , Karchmer, M. A. , & Schildroth, A. N. (1981). Profile of psychological services provided to hearing-impaired students. American Annals of the Deaf, 126, 94-105.

12.

Sullivan, P. M. (1982). Administrative modifications on the WISC-R Performance Scale with different categories of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 127, 780-788.

13.

Sullivan, P. M. , & Vernon, M. (1979). Psychological assessment of hearing-impaired children. School Psychology Digest, 8, 271-290.

14.

Trott, L. A. (1984). Providing school psychological services to hearing-impaired students in New Jersey. American Annals of the Deaf, 129, 319-323.

15.

U.S. Government (1977). Public Law 94-142. Federal Register, 42, 163.

16.

Vernon M. , & Brown, D. W. (1964). A guide to psychological tests and testing procedures in the evaluation of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 29, 414-423.