Evidence of Item Bias in the Verbal Subtests of the WISC-R for Mexican-American Children

Abstract

The study investigated cultural bias in the verbal items of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R). Six verbal subtests of the WISC-R were administered to 40 Anglo and 40 Mexican-American subjects matched for grade level, sex, and socioeconomic status. The responses of two groups of subjects to individual items comprising verbal subtests were analyzed by log-linear technique using the likelihood ratio chi-square statistic. The findings revealed that the performance of subjects was homogeneous across two cultural groups on the items comprising Arithmetic, Comprehension, and Digit Span subtests. Ten (13%) of the 79 items comprising Information, Similarities, and Vocabulary subtests were, however, found to be biased against Mexican-American subjects. Three of these items are from the Information subtest, two from Similarities, and the remaining five items from Vocabulary. Implications of these findings for the psychoeducational assessment of minority children were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anastasi, A. Psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1982.

Berk, R. A. Introduction. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.

Cleary, T. A. Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5, 115-124.

Dixon, W. J. BMDP-Biomedical Computer Programs. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1979.

Everitt, B. S. The analysis of contingency tables. New York: Wiley, 1977.

Feinberg, S. E. The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1977.

Goodman, L. A. Analyzing qualitative! categorical data. Cambridge, Mass.: ABT Books, 1978.

Jensen, A. R. Test bias and construct validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 1976, 58, 340-346.

Knoke, D. , & Burke, P. J. Log-linear models. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1980.

10.

Miele, F. Cultural bias in the WISC. Intelligence, 1979, 3, 149-164.

11.

Mishra, S. P. The WISC-R and evidence of item bias for Native-American Navajos. Psychology in the Schools, 1982, 19, 458-464.

12.

Oakland, T. (Ed.). Psychological and educational assessment of minority children. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1977.

13.

Reynolds, C. R. The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology. New York: Wiley, 1982.

14.

Samuda, R. J. The psychological testing of American minorities. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.

15.

Sandoval, J. The WISC-R and internal evidence of test bias with minority groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 47, 919-927.

16.

Sandoval, J. , & Miille, M. P. W. Accuracy of judgments of WISC-R item difficulty for minority groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 48, 249-253.

17.

Scheuneman, J. D. Latent-trait theory and item bias. In L. J. T. van der Kamp , W. F. Langerak , & D. N. M. de Gruizter (Eds.), Psychometrics for educational debates. New York: Wiley, 1980.

18.

Shepard, L. A. Definitions of bias. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.

19.

Thorndike, R. L. Concept of culture-fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement 1971, 8, 63-70.

20.

Vance, H. B. , Gaynor, P. , & Coleman, M. Analysis of cognitive abilities for learning disabled children. Psychology in the Schools, 1976, 13, 477-483.

21.

Wechsler, D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corp., 1974.

22.

Williams, R. L. Abuses and misuses in testing black children. Counseling Psychologist, 1971, 2, 62-73.