This study developed an Academic Self-Management Skills Scale to assess the self-management skills of middle school students. In the first phase, focus group interviews and short-answer forms were administered to students and teachers. Responses were analyzed using open and axial coding, along with thematic analysis, and a draft scale was constructed based on the analysis results. In the second phase, the scale’s validity and reliability were evaluated through a pilot study. The final version was administered to a different student sample, and a cross-validation analysis was conducted. The findings indicate that the scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring middle school students’ self-management skills.
AbdullahM. H. (2001). Self-directed learning. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED459458
2.
Al-AbyadhM. H. A.Abdel AzeemH. A. H. (2022). Academic achievement: Influences of university students’ self-management and perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Intelligence, 10(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030055
3.
Aşkın-Tekkolİ.DemirelM. (2018). Öz-yönetimli öğrenme becerileri Ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Self-directed learning skills scale: Validity and reliability study]. Eğitimde Ve Psikolojide Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 9(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.389208
4.
BandalosD. L.YatesK.Thorndike-ChristT. (1995). Effects of math self-concept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.611
5.
BurrissK. G.SneadD. (2017). Middle school students’ perceptions regarding the motivation and effectiveness of homework. School Community Journal, 27(2), 193–210. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1165640.pdf
6.
ByrneB. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.
7.
ChoiJ. H.ChungK. M. (2012). Effectiveness of a college-level self-management course on successful behavior change. Behavior Modification, 36(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445511418102
8.
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2008). Learning and Leading with Habits of Mind: 16 Essential Characteristics for Success. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
9.
CredéM.KuncelN. R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 425–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x
10.
DabbaghN.KitsantasA. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
11.
DuckworthA. L.SeligmanM. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting the academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
12.
DuckworthA. L.SeligmanM. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198
13.
Eryılmaz BallıE.KartalS. (2020). Okul terki araştırmaları: Sistematik bir analiz çalışması [School dropout research: A systematic analysis study]. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(2), 257–278. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kusbd/issue/56190/615994
14.
FabozziF. J.FocardiS. M.RachevS. T.ArshanapalliB. G. (2014). The basics of financial econometrics: Tools, concepts, and asset management applications. John Wiley & Sons.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
17.
FraenkelJ. R.WallenN. E.HyunH. H. F. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
18.
GagnonR. J.StoneG. A.GarstB. A. (2017). Beyond composite scores and Cronbach’s alpha: Advancing methodological rigor in recreation research. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 9(4), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2017-V9-I4-7959
19.
GibbonsM. (2003). The self-directed learning handbook: Challenging adolescent students to excel. Jossey-Bass.
20.
GomezS. J. (2017). Self-management skills of management graduates. International Journal of Research in Management & Business Studies, 4(3), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.20180423033130
21.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
22.
GuestG.NameyE.ChenM. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS One, 15(5), Article e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
23.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.
24.
HairJ. F.Jr.HultG. T. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
25.
HembreeR. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047
26.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
27.
KaneM. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000
28.
Karacan OzdemirN.Aras KemerF. N.ArslanA.TunaB. (2024). A qualitative study of unveiling school dropout complexity in Türkiye. Child Indicators Research, 17(3), 1001–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10116-7
29.
KimR.OlfmanL.RyanT.EryilmazE. (2014). Leveraging a personalized system to improve self-directed learning in online educational environments. Computers & Education, 70, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.006
30.
KnowlesM. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.
31.
KöseoğluE.BoyacıŞ. D. (2022). İlkokul öğrencilerine yönelik öz-yönetim becerileri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [development of a self-management skills scale for primary school students: A validity and reliability study]. Tarih Okulu Dergisi, 15(59), 2495–2517. https://doi.org/10.29228/Joh.62591
32.
LiuO. L.RijmenF.MacCannC.RobertsR. (2009). The assessment of time management in middle-school students. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.018
33.
LorigK. R.HolmanH. R. (2003). Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01
34.
MacCannC.DuckworthA. L.RobertsR. D. (2009). Empirical identification of the major facets of conscientiousness. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 451–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.007
35.
ManzC. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306232
36.
McLaneK. (2006). Integrating student progress monitoring into your classroom: The teacher’s perspective. Reading Rockets.
37.
MezoP. G. (2009). The self-control and self-management scale (SCMS): Development of an adaptive self-regulatory coping skills instrument. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-008-9104-2
MulukS.AkmalS.AndrianaD.HabiburrahimH.SafrulM. S. (2021). Understanding students’ self-management skills at state Islamic university in Indonesia. The Qualitative Report, 26(7), 2333–2346. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4817
41.
National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2019). 2019 NACE student survey report: Two-year students executive summary. National Association of Colleges and Employers.
42.
NoftleE. E.RobinsR. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116
43.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw‐Hill.
44.
OwenA. M. (1997). Cognitive planning in humans: Neuropsychological, neuroanatomical and neuropharmacological perspectives. Progress in Neurobiology, 53(4), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(97)00042-7
PoropatA. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
47.
PriceL. R.ÖzerA.AtarB. (2021). Psychometric methods from theory to practice. Mentis.
48.
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Child Development Perspectives, 10(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12178
49.
RobertsB. W.ChernyshenkoO. S.StarkS.GoldbergL. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 103–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x
50.
RobertsB. W.KuncelN. R.ShinerR.CaspiA.GoldbergL. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
51.
Rotheram-BorusM. J.IngramB. L.SwendemanD.LeeA. (2012). Adoption of self-management interventions for prevention and care. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 39(4), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2012.08.006
52.
RoweJ. B.OwenA. M.JohnsrudeI. S.PassinghamR. E. (2001). Imaging the mental components of a planning task. Neuropsychologia, 39(3), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00109-3
53.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
54.
SuhH. N.WangK. T.ArterberryB. J. (2015). Development and initial validation of the self-directed learning inventory with Korean college students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914557728
55.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000
56.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
57.
Van de SchootR.LugtigP.HoxJ. (2015). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.934663
58.
Van ProoijenJ. W.Van Der KlootW. A. (2001). Confirmatory analysis of exploratively obtained factor structures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(5), 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971518
59.
VoorheesC. M.BradyM. K.CalantoneR.RamirezE. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
60.
WelshM. C.Satterlee-CartmellT.StineM. (1999). Towers of Hanoi and London: Contribution of working memory and inhibition to performance. Brain and Cognition, 41(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1999.1123
61.
WuA. D.LiZ.ZumboB. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.7275/mhqa-cd89
YıldırımA.SimsekH. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (11. baskı).(11th ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
64.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
