Tangible manipulatives are commonly used to teach mathematics and assess the mathematics understanding of young learners. However, manipulatives have drawbacks during assessment. To evaluate the utility and necessity of manipulatives during assessment of mathematical operations, examiners administered addition and subtraction problems with concrete manipulatives or pictorial supports to 2,390 children aged 2.8 to 6.7 years. We compared the impacts of test format (presentation of concrete manipulatives versus pictorial supports) and operation (addition versus subtraction) on test items’ abilities to capture young learners’ early operations abilities and on items’ difficulties. Preliminary findings indicate both test formats and both mathematical operations equally well captured children’s latent operations abilities. Students found addition items with pictorial supports easier than addition items presented with manipulatives, and they responded more quickly to test items presented with pictorial supports. Implications for assessment in early mathematics and future research are discussed.
AndersY.RossbachH.-G.WeinertS.EbertS.KugerS.LehrlS.Von MauriceJ. (2012). Home and preschool learning environments and their relations to the development of early numeracy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.08.003
2.
AnthonyJ. L.WilliamsJ. M.FosterM. E.AsselM. A.ErazoN.PhamT.CarloM. (2024). School Readiness Curriculum Based Measurement System - Math (English Version). University of South Florida and University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
BassetteL.ShurrJ.BouckE.ParkJ.CremeansM. (2019). Comparison of concrete and app-based manipulatives to teach subtraction skills to elementary students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(4), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416471905400407
5.
BroadfootP.BlackP. (2004). Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000208976
6.
CarbonneauK. J.MarleyS. C.SeligJ. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031084
7.
CarpenterT. P.AnsellE.FrankeM. L.FennemaE.WeisbeckL. (1993). Models of problem solving: A study of kindergarten children’s problem-solving processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.24.5.0428
8.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2021). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (3rd ed.). Routledge.
9.
CoelhoV.ÅströmF.NesbittK.SjömanM.FarranD.Björck-ÅkessonE.ChristopherC.GranlundM.AlmqvistL.GrandeC.PintoA. I. (2021). Preschool practices in Sweden, Portugal, and the United States. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55(2021), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.11.004
DevlinB. L.JordanN. C.KleinA. (2022). Predicting mathematics achievement from subdomains of early number competence: Differences by grade and achievement level. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 217, 105354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105354
12.
ErtleB. B. (2017). Using mathematical analyses activities to improve manipulative discrimination in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 38(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2017.1306601
13.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools. What Works Clearinghouse.
14.
GonskiD. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Commonwealth of Australia.
15.
HansenN.JordanN. C.FernandezE.SieglerR. S.FuchsL.GerstenR.MicklosD. (2015). General and math-specific predictors of sixth-graders’ knowledge of fractions. Cognitive Development, 35, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.02.001
16.
HintonV. M.FloresM. M. (2019). The effects of the concrete-representational-abstract sequence for students at risk for mathematics failure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(4), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-09316-3
17.
HospM. K.HospJ. L.HowellK. W. (2016). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. Guilford Publications.
18.
HughesM. (1986). Children and number: Difficulties in learning mathematics.
JodoinM. G.GierlM. J. (2001). Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection.Applied measurement in education, 14(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1404_2
22.
JonesJ. P.TillerM. (2017). Using concrete manipulatives in mathematical instruction. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 45(1), 18–23.
23.
JordanN. C.GluttingJ.RamineniC. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.004
24.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.LocuniakM. N.RamineniC. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00229.x
25.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.OlahL. N.LocuniakM. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at-risk for mathematics difficulities. Child Development, 77(1), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00862.x
26.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.RamineniC.LocuniakM. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939
27.
KamataA.BauerD. J. (2008). A note on the relation between factor analytic and item response theory models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701758406
28.
KimS.-Y. (1993). The relative effectiveness of hands-on and computer-simulated manipulatives in teaching seriation, classification, geometric, and arithmetic concepts to kindergarten children. University of Oregon.
29.
KleinJ. S.BisanzJ. (2000). Preschoolers doing arithmetic: The concepts are willing but the working memory is weak. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087333
30.
KloppE. (2020). A tutorial on testing the equality of standardized regression coefficients in structural equation models using Wald tests with lavaan. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16(4), 315–333.
31.
KoomenM.ZoanettiN. (2018). Strategic planning tools for large-scale technology-based assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(2), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2016.1173013
32.
KwanJ. L.ChanW. (2011). Comparing standardized coefficients in structural equation modeling: A model reparameterization approach. Behavior research methods, 43(3), 730–745. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0088-6
33.
LeFevreJ.FastL.SkwarchukS.Smith‐ChantB. L.BisanzJ.KamawarD.Penner‐WilgerM. (2010). Pathways to mathematics: Longitudinal predictors of performance. Child Development, 81(6), 1753–1767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01508.x
34.
LevineS. C.JordanN. C.HuttenlocherJ. (1992). Development of calculation abilities in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53(1), 72–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0965(05)80005-0
LittleT. D.RhemtullaM. (2013). Planned missing data designs for developmental researchers. Child Development Perspectives, 7(4), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12043
37.
LiuY.PengP.YanX. (2025). Early numeracy and mathematics development: A longitudinal meta-analysis on the predictive nature of early numeracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 117(6), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000925
38.
MarleyS. C.CarbonneauK. J. (2015). How psychological research with instructional manipulatives can inform classroom learning. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(4), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000047
39.
MazzoccoM. M.BurchinalM. R.SchulteA. C.VandellD. L.SanabriaA.HwangJ. K.ConnorC. M. (2024). Mathematics in US preschool and kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 69, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.04.007
40.
McGuireP.KinzieM. B.BerchD. B. (2012). Developing number sense in pre-k with five-frames. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(4), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-011-0479-4
41.
McNeilN. M.JarvinL. (2007). When theories don’t add up: Disentangling the manipulatives debate. Theory Into Practice, 46(4), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840701593899
42.
MelhuishE. C.PhanM. B.SylvaK.SammonsP.Siraj‐BlatchfordI.TaggartB. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00550.x
43.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.WuQ. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408331037
NelsonG.KissA. J.CoddingR. S.McKevettN. M.SchmittJ. F.ParkS.RomeroM. E.HwangJ. (2023). Review of curriculum-based measurement in mathematics: An update and extension of the literature. Journal of School Psychology, 97, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.12.001
48.
NelsonG.PowellS. R. (2018). A systematic review of longitudinal studies of mathematics difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417714773
49.
NeumannM. M.AnthonyJ. L.ErazoN. A.NeumannD. L. (2019). Assessment and technology: Mapping future directions in the early childhood classroom. Frontiers in Education, 4(October), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00116
50.
NguyenT.WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. S.WolfeC.SpitlerM. E. (2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.02.003
51.
PurpuraD. J.LoniganC. J. (2015). Early numeracy assessment: The development of the preschool numeracy scales. Early Education and Development, 26(2), 286–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.991084
52.
PurpuraD. J.ReidE. E.EilandM. D.BaroodyA. J. (2015). Using a brief preschool early numeracy skills screener to identify young children with mathematics difficulties. School Psychology Review, 44(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR44-1.41-59
53.
RaykovT.DimitrovD. M.AsparouhovT. (2010). Evaluation of scale reliability with binary measures using latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511003659417
54.
SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ.WitmerS. (2016). Assessment in special and inclusive education. Cengage Learning.
SchrankF. A.WendlingB. J.AlvaradoC. G. (2010). Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey-Revised Normative Update.Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
57.
ShermanJ.BisanzJ. (2009). Equivalence in symbolic and nonsymbolic contexts: Benefits of solving problems with manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013156
58.
StarkeyP.GelmanR. (2020). The development of addition and subtraction abilities prior to formal schooling in arithmetic. In Addition and subtraction (pp. 99–116). Routledge.
59.
StarrA.LibertusM. E.BrannonE. M. (2013). Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(45), 18116–18120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302751110
WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2018). What is the long‐run impact of learning mathematics during preschool?Child Development, 89(2), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12713
62.
WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.SieglerR. S.Davis-KeanP. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14553660
63.
WeilandC.WolfeC. B.HurwitzM. D.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. H.YoshikawaH. (2012). Early mathematics assessment: Validation of the short form of a prekindergarten and kindergarten mathematics measure. Educational Psychology, 32(3), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.654190
64.
YeA.ResnickI.HansenN.RodriguesJ.RinneL.JordanN. C. (2016). Pathways to fraction learning: Numerical abilities mediate the relation between early cognitive competencies and later fraction knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
