This study assessed the validity of the Student Homework Goal Orientation Scale (SHGOS) using a sample of 597 students from Grades 7 and 9. Confirmatory analyses supported a five-factor model—mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance, performance-approach, performance-avoidance, and work-avoidance. Reliability estimates for the subscales ranged from very good to excellent. In addition, latent mean invariance was found across both gender and grade level. As theoretically anticipated, mastery-approach was linked to lower procrastination and greater homework interest, completion, emotion regulation, and mathematics achievement, while performance-approach showed weaker associations. The avoidance subscales—particularly work-avoidance—were generally tied to maladaptive outcomes. Collectively, these results provide compelling evidence the SHGOS is a psychometrically robust measure of students’ homework goal orientations.
AvcıS.ÖzgenelM. (2025). Homework completion and academic achievement: A multilevel study in high school settings. Journal of Educational Research, 118(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2024.2431680
3.
AvcıS.ÖzgenelM.AvcuA.BayramM. (2025). Personal, motivational, volitional and contextual antecedents of procrastination in homework. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10128-3
4.
BeikA.ChoY. (2024). Effects of goal orientation on online learning: A meta-analysis of differences in Korea and US. Current Psychology, 43(2), 1496–1506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04389-4
5.
BuglerM.McGeownS.St Clair‐ThompsonH. (2016). An investigation of gender and age differences in academic motivation and classroom behaviour in adolescents. Educational Psychology, 36(7), 1196–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1035697
6.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
7.
CooperH. (1989). Homework. Longman.
8.
CooperH.RobinsonJ. C.PatallE. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001
9.
DaumillerM.DickhäuserO.DreselM. (2019). University instructors’ achievement goals for teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000271
10.
DettmersS.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.GoetzT.FrenzelA. C.PekrunR. (2011). Students’ emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.001
ElliotA. J.ChurchM. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
14.
ElliotA. J.HigginsE. T.NakkawitaE. (2025). The (absence of the) presence–absence distinction in motivation science. Psychological Review, 132(1), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000508
15.
ElliotA. J.HullemanC. S. (2017). Achievement goals. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S.YeagerD. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (pp. 43–60). Guilford Press.
16.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
17.
FanH.XuJ.CaiZ.HeJ.FanX. (2017). Homework and students’ achievement in math and science: A 30-year meta-analysis, 1986-2015. Educational Research Review, 20(6), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.003
18.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
19.
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK. E.TauerJ. M.CarterS. M.ElliotA. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
20.
HirtC. N.KarlenY.MerkiK. M.SuterF. (2021). What makes high achievers different from low achievers? self-Regulated learners in the context of a high-stakes academic long-term task. Learning and Individual Differences, 92(3), Article 102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102085
21.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
22.
HullemanC. S.SchragerS. M.BodmannS. M.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018947
23.
KingR. B.McInerneyD. M. (2014). The work avoidance goal construct: Examining its structure, antecedents, and consequences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.12.002
24.
KingR. B.WatkinsD. A. (2011). The reliability and validity of the goal orientation and learning strategies survey: A Filipino investigation. Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 591–606.
25.
NichollsJ. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
26.
NúñezJ. C.SuárezN.RosárioP.VallejoG.ValleA.EpsteinJ. L. (2015). Relationships between perceived parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: Differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 375–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9135-5
27.
PayneS. C.YoungcourtS. S.BeaubienJ. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128
28.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A. F.GarciaT.McKeachieW. J. (1993). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire: University of Michigan.
29.
SeifertT. L.O'KeefeB. A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goals to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158406
30.
SunM.DuJ.XuJ. (2020). The validation of teachers’ goal orientations for professional learning scale (TGOPLS) on information technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(5), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1808523
31.
SunM.DuJ.XuJ.LiuF. (2019). Homework goal orientation scale: Measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender and grade level. Psychology in the Schools, 56(3), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22206
32.
UrdanT.KaplanA. (2020). The origins, evolution, and future directions of achievement goal theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101862
33.
Van YperenN. W.BlagaM.PostmesT. (2014). A meta‐analysis of self‐reported achievement goals and nonself-report performance across three achievement domains (work, sports, and education). PLOS One, 9(4), Article e93594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093594
34.
WatkinsM. W. (2017). The reliability of multidimensional neuropsychological measures: From alpha to omega. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(6-7), 1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1317364
35.
WigfieldA.CambriaJ. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
36.
XuJ. (2017). Homework expectancy value scale for high school students: Measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender and grade level. Learning and Individual Differences, 60, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.10.003
37.
XuJ. (2021). Homework goal orientation, interest, and achievement: Testing models of reciprocal effects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(2), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00472-7
38.
XuJ. (2022). More than minutes: A person-centered approach to homework time, homework time management, and homework procrastination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 70(1), Article 102087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102087
39.
XuJ. (2023). Student interest in mathematics homework: Do peer interest and homework approaches matter?Psychology in the Schools, 60(10), 4011–4028. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22963
40.
XuJ. (2024a). Investigating factors influencing students’ regulation of homework emotion: Integrating multiple theoretical perspectives. Metacognition and Learning, 19(3), 999–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09395-w
41.
XuJ. (2024b). Student-perceived teacher and parent homework involvement: Exploring latent profiles and links to homework behavior and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 109(1), Article 102403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102403
42.
XuJ. (2025a). Do homework effort and approaches matter? Regulation of homework motivation among Chinese students. Education Sciences, 15(6), 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060666
43.
XuJ. (2025b). Online homework time, time management, and procrastination: A person-centered approach. Computers & Education, 234(1), Article 105341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105341
44.
XuJ.CornoL. (2022). Extending a model of homework: A multilevel analysis with Chinese middle school students. Metacognition and Learning, 17(2), 531–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09296-w
45.
XuJ.DuJ.WangC. (2022). A psychometric evaluation of online homework goal orientation scale. Current Psychology, 41(7), 4501–4509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00953-4
46.
XuJ.DuJ.WangC.LiuF.HuangB.ZhangM.XieJ. (2020). Intrinsic motivation, favorability, time management, and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Learning and Motivation, 72(3), Article 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101677
47.
XuJ.FanX.DuJ. (2016). Homework emotion regulation scale: Psychometric properties for middle school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(4), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915603542
48.
XuJ.FanX.DuJ. (2017). Homework emotion regulation scale: Confirming the factor structure with high school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(4), 437–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916640438
49.
XuJ.GuoS.FengY.MaY.ZhangY.NúñezJ. C.FanH. (2024). Parental homework involvement and students’ achievement: A three-level meta-analysis. Psicothema, 36(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.92
50.
YangF.XuJ.GalloK.NúñezJ. C. (2024). Homework approach scale for middle school students: Tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 40(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000746
