Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Woodcock-Johnson V (WJ V; McGrew, Mather, LaForte, et al., 2025) represents the most significant evolution in comprehensive cognitive assessment since the battery was introduced nearly 50 years ago. This article provides an overview of the WJ V Tests of Cognitive Abilities and Virtual Test Library, highlighting key revisions from the WJ IV and examining psychometric properties and interpretive options. The WJ V assessment system comprises 60 co-normed tests across cognitive, achievement, and language domains, making it the most comprehensive assessment battery currently available. Major innovations include a fully digital platform, contemporary post-pandemic norms, enhanced theoretical alignment with current Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theories, and expanded diagnostic capabilities through the new Virtual Test Library. The WJ V Tests of Cognitive Abilities contains 20 tests organized into 17 clusters, including three general intelligence measures, seven CHC broad ability clusters, and six narrow ability/clinical clusters. Significant structural changes include the creation of a new Retrieval Fluency (Gr) broad ability cluster, the removal of Auditory Processing (Ga) from the General Intellectual Ability (GIA) cluster, substantial revisions to the GIA composition, and the relocation of specialized tests to the Virtual Test Library, which incorporates 15 specialized tests, enabling the targeted evaluation of phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, and memory functions critical for the identification of dyslexia. Extensive validity evidence supporting the battery’s structure was obtained through a sophisticated three-stage framework employing multiple analytical methods, including exploratory factor analysis, multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis, and psychometric network analysis. Clinical validity studies demonstrate the battery’s effectiveness in differentiating various neurodevelopmental conditions. The WJ V’s four-level interpretive framework emphasizes criterion-referenced proficiency measures alongside traditional norm-referenced scores, providing educationally relevant information for intervention planning. This comprehensive assessment system offers practitioners unprecedented flexibility for hypothesis-driven evaluation while maintaining the psychometric rigor essential for high-stakes educational and diagnostic decisions, positioning it as a transformative tool for evidence-based assessment practices in the digital age.

Keywords

cognitive abilities individual differences WJ V intelligence CHC theory WJ V COG WJ V VTL diagnostic tests

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education . (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.

Basnet

Noggle

C. A.

Dean

R. S.

(2015). Neurocognitive problems in children and adolescents with depression using the CHC theory and the WJ-III. Applied Neuropsychology Child, 4(4), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2014.908124

Bond

T. G.

Fox

C. M.

(2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human science (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Borgatti

S. P.

(2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008

Borsboom

van der Maas

H. L.

Dalege

Kievit

R. A.

Haig

B. D.

(2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for building theories in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 756–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620969647

Bulut

Cormier

D. C.

Aquilina

A. M.

Bulut

H. C.

(2021). Age and sex invariance of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities: Evidence from psychometric network modeling. Journal of Intelligence, 9(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9030035

Caemmerer

J. M.

Keith

T. Z.

Reynolds

M. R.

(2020). Beyond individual intelligence tests: Application of Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. Intelligence, 79, Article 101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101433

Canivez

G. L.

(2017). Review of the Woodcock-Johnson IV. In Carlson

J. F.

Geisinger

K. F.

Johnson

J. L.

(Eds.), The twentieth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 391–398). Buros Center for Testing.

Carroll

J. B.

(1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.

10.

Chaiklin

(2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin

Gindis

Ageyev

V. S.

Miller

S. M.

(Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge University Press.

11.

Cormier

D. C.

McGrew

K. S.

Evans

J. J.

(2011). Quantifying the “degree of linguistic demand” in spoken intelligence test directions. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(6), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911405962

12.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555

13.

Cummins

(1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question, and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, No. 19, 121–129.

14.

Cummins

(1980). The entry and exit fallacy in bilingual education. NABE Journal, 4(3), 25–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/08855072.1980.10668382

15.

Cummins

(1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. College-Hill.

16.

Decker

S. L.

Bridges

R. M.

Luedke

J. C.

Eason

M. J.

(2020). Dimensional evaluation of cognitive measures: Methodological confounds and theoretical concerns. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282920940879

17.

Decker

S. L.

Davis

A. S.

Eason

Bridges

Vasel

L. M.

(2017). Assessment of executive functioning using the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities (assessment service bulletin no. 11). Riverside Assessments, LLC.

18.

Denckla

M. B.

Rudel

R. G.

(1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14(4), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0

19.

Dombrowski

S. C.

McGill

R. J.

Canivez

G. L.

(2018). An alternative conceptualization of the theoretical structure of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Cognitive Abilities at school age: A confirmatory factor analytic investigation. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000039

20.

Dumont

Willis

J. O.

Walrath

(2016). Clinical interpretation of the Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of cognitive abilities, academic achievement, and oral language. In Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

(Eds.), WJ IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives. Academic Press.

21.

Flanagan

D. P.

(2025). Clinical reasoning and decision-making for specific learning disabilities. In Andrews

J. J. W.

Sakofske

D. H.

(Eds.), Child and adolescent reasoning and decisions making: Child assessment and intervention (pp. 41–148). Academic Press.

22.

Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

(2017). Essentials of WISC-V assessment. Wiley.

23.

Flanagan

D. P.

Mascolo

J. T.

Ortiz

S. O.

Alfonso

V. C.

(2024). Intervention library: Finding interventions and resources for students and teachers (IL:FIRST). Wiley. [computer software].

24.

Flanagan

D. P.

Ortiz

S. O.

Alfonso

V. C.

(2025a). Cross-battery assessment software system (XBASS Version 3.0). Wiley. [Computer software].

25.

Flanagan

D. P.

Ortiz

S. O.

Alfonso

V. C.

(2025b). Essentials of cross-battery assessment and X-BASS (4th ed.). Wiley. [Manuscript in preparation.].

26.

Floyd

R. G.

Woods

I. L.

Singh

L. J.

Hawkins

H. K.

(2016). Use of the Woodcock Johnson IV in the diagnosis of intellectual disability. In Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

(Eds.), WJ IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 272–290). Academic Press.

27.

Folstein

M. F.

Folstein

S. E.

McHugh

P. R.

(2010). Mini-Mental Status Examination–second edition (MMSE-2). PAR.

28.

Gignac

G. E.

(2015). Raven’s is not a pure measure of general intelligence: Implications for g factor theory and the brief measurement of g. Intelligence, 52(52), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.07.006

29.

Golino

H. F.

Epskamp

(2017). Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research. PloS One, 12(6), e0174035. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174035

30.

Gustafsson

J. E.

(1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities. Intelligence, 8(3), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(84)90008-4

31.

Haier

R. J.

Jung

R. E.

(2018). The parieto-frontal integration theory: Assessing intelligence from brain images. In Flanagan

D. P.

McDonough

E. M.

(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 219–224). Guilford Press.

32.

Hajovsky

D. B.

Niileksela

C. R.

Robbins

Sun

(2025a). Understanding contextual specificity in cognitive-reading relations: Moderation by age and IQ. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829251352605

33.

Hajovsky

D. B.

Nilleksela

C. R.

Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

Schneider

W. J.

Robbins

(2025b). Toward a consensus model of cognitive-reading achievement relations using meta-structural equation modeling. Journal of Intelligence, Advanced Online Publication.

34.

Harvey

P. D.

(2012). Clinical applications of neuropsychological assessment. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/pharvey

35.

Hawes

Sokolowski

H. M.

Ononye

C. B.

Ansari

(2019). Neural underpinnings of numerical and spatial cognition: An fMRI meta-analysis of brain regions associated with symbolic number, arithmetic, and mental rotation. NeuroImage, 188, 351–370.

36.

Hevey

(2018). Network analysis: A brief overview and tutorial. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2018.1521283

37.

Hoelzle

Simons

Meyer

McGrew

(2023). Neuropsychological assessment and the Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) model. In Boyle

G. J.

Stern

Stein

D. J.

Sahakian

B. J.

Golden

C. J.

Lee

T. M.

Chen

S. A.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of clinical neuropsychology: Clinical neuropsychological assessment and diagnosis (pp. 108–118). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529789539.n8

38.

Horn

J. L.

(1998). A basis for research on age differences in cognitive capabilities. In McArdle

J. J.

Woodcock

R. W.

(Eds.), Human cognitive abilities in theory and practice (pp. 57–91). Lawrence Erlbaum.

39.

Horn

J. L.

Blankson

(2012). Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan

D. P.

Harrison

P. L.

(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 73–98). Guilford Press.

40.

Horn

J. L.

Knoll

(1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. In Flanagan

D. P.

Genshaft

J. L.

Harrison

P. L.

(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53–91). Guilford Press.

41.

Hornung

Martin

Fayol

(2017). General and specific contributions of RAN to reading and arithmetic fluency in first graders: A longitudinal latent variable approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01746

42.

International Test Commission & Association of Test Publishers . (2022). Guidelines for technology-based assessment. Association of Test Publishers.

43.

Jacoby

W. G.

Ciuk

D. J.

(2018). Multidimensional scaling: An introduction. In Irwing

P. I.

Booth

Hughes

D. J.

(Eds.), The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale, and test development (pp. 317–412). Wiley.

44.

Jaffe

L. E.

(2009). Development, interpretation, and application of the W score and the relative proficiency index (Woodcock-Johnson III assessment service bulletin no. 11). Riverside Assessments, LLC.

45.

JASP Team . (2022). JASP (version 0.17.2.1). [Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/ (accessed on 4 October 2021).

46.

Jones

P. J.

Mair

McNally

R. J.

(2018). Visualizing psychological networks: A tutorial in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1742. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01742

47.

Jurica

P. J.

Leitten

C. L.

Mattis

(2001). Dementia rating scale–second edition (DRS-2). PAR.

48.

Kaufman

A. S.

Kaufman

N. L.

(2014). Kaufman tests of educational achievement, third edition (KTEA-3). Pearson.

49.

Kaufman

A. S.

Raiford

S. E.

Coalson

D. L.

(2018). Kaufman assessment battery for children–second edition, normative update (KABC-II NU). AGS Publishing.

50.

Keith

T. Z.

Reynolds

M. R.

(2018). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In Flanagan

I. D. P.

McDonough

E. M.

(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 853–900). Guilford Press.

51.

Kirby

J. R.

Parrila

R. K.

Pfeiffer

S. L.

(2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.453

52.

Kovacs

Conway

A. R.

(2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27(3), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2016.1153946

53.

Kriesche

Woll

C. F. J.

Tschentscher

Engel

R. R.

Karch

(2023). Neurocognitive deficits in depression: A systematic review of cognitive impairment in the acute and remitted state. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 273(5), 1105–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-022-01479-5

54.

LaForte

E. M.

Dailey

McGrew

K. S.

(2025). Technical manual. Woodcock-Johnson V. Riverside Assessments, LLC.

55.

LaForte

E. M.

Mather

Schneider

W. J.

Essentials of Woodcock-Johnson V. Wiley. (in press).

56.

Lezak

M. D.

(1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

57.

Mather

McGrew

K. S.

LaForte

E. M.

Wendling

B. J.

(2025a). Woodcock-Johnson V tests of achievement. Riverside Assessments. LLC.

58.

Mather

McGrew

K. S.

LaForte

E. M.

Wendling

B. J.

(2025b). Woodcock-Johnson V virtual test library. Riverside Assessments, LLC.

59.

Mather

Wendling

B. J.

(2024). Essentials of dyslexia assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). Wiley.

60.

Mather

Wendling

B. J.

Snader

E. H.

Jeantete

G. T.

(Contributor) (2025c). Examiner’s manual. Woodcock-Johnson V. Riverside Assessments, LLC.

61.

Mazur-Mosiewicz

Trammell

B. A.

Noggle

C. A.

Dean

R. S.

(2011). Differential diagnosis of depression and Alzheimer's disease using the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. Applied Neuropsychology, 18(4), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084282.2011.595451

62.

McDonough

Flanagan

D. P.

(2016). Use of the Woodcock-Johnson IV in the diagnosis of specific learning disabilities in school-age children. In Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

(Eds.), WJ IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 212–253). Academic Press.

63.

McDonough

E. M.

Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

(2017). Specific learning disorder. In Goldstein

DeVries

(Eds.), Handbook of DSM-5 disorders in children and adolescents (pp. 77–104). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57196-6_4

64.

McGill

R. J.

Dombrowski

S. C.

Canivez

G. L.

(2018). Cognitive profile analysis in school psychology: History, issues, and continued concerns. Journal of School Psychology, 71, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.007

65.

McGrew

K. S.

(1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In Flanagan

D. P.

Harrison

P. L.

Genshaft

J. L.

(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 136–181). Guilford Press.

66.

McGrew

K. S.

(2023). Carroll’s three-stratum (3S) cognitive ability theory at 30 years: Impact, 3S-CHC theory clarification, structural replication, and cognitive–achievement psychometric network analysis extension. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020032

67.

McGrew

K. S.

Mather

LaForte

E. M.

(2025). Woodcock-Johnson V tests of cognitive abilities. Riverside Assessments, LLC.

68.

McGrew

K. S.

Mather

LaForte

E. M.

Wendling

B. J.

(2025). Woodcock-Johnson V. Riverside Assessments, LLC.

69.

McGrew

K. S.

Schneider

W. J.

Decker

S. L.

Bulut

(2023). A psychometric network analysis of CHC intelligence measures: Implications for research, theory, and interpretation of broad CHC scores “beyond g”. Journal of Intelligence, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010019

70.

Meehl

P. E.

(1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality, 60(1), 117–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00269.x

71.

Miller

D. C.

McGill

R. J.

Johnson

W. L. B.

(2016). Neurocognitive applications of the Woodcock-Johnson IV. In Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

(Eds.), WJ IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 355–388). Academic Press.

72.

Murray

A. L.

Johnson

(2013). The limitations of model fit in comparing the bi-factor versus higher-order models of human cognitive ability structure. Intelligence, 41(5), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.004

73.

NCS Pearson . (2020). Wechsler individual achievement test, fourth edition (WIAT-4). Pearson.

74.

Neal

Z. P.

Neal

J. W.

(2021). Out of bounds? The boundary specification problem for centrality in psychological networks. Psychological Methods, 28(1), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000426

75.

Niileksela

C. R.

Hajovsky

D. B.

Villeneuve

E. F.

(2025). Cognitive-achievement relations with the Woodcock-Johnson V. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829251353032

76.

Norton

E. S.

Wolf

(2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 427–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100431

77.

Ortiz

S. O.

(2019). On the measurement of cognitive abilities in English learners. Contemporary School Psychology, 23(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0208-8

78.

Ortiz

S. O.

Cehelyk

S. K.

(2024). The bilingual is not two monolinguals of the same age: Normative testing implications for multilinguals. Journal of Intelligence, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12010003

79.

Owens

M. M.

Duda

Sweet

L. H.

Rosenberg

M. D.

Martinez

S. A.

Rapuano

K. M.

Conley

M. I.

Cohen

A. O.

Cornejo

M. D.

Hagler

D. J.

Jr. Meredith

W. J.

Anderson

K. M.

Wager

T. D.

Feczko

Earl

Fair

D. A.

Barch

D. M.

Watts

Casey

(2020). Behavioral and neural signatures of working memory in childhood. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(26), 5090–5104.

80.

Peters

De Smedt

(2017). Specialization of the right intraparietal sulcus for processing mathematics during development. Cerebral Cortex, 27(9), 4436–4446.

81.

Pfeiffer

S. I.

Yarnell

J. B.

(2016). Use of the Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of cognitive abilities and achievement in the assessment of giftedness. In Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

(Eds.), WJ IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 355–388). Elsevier Academic Press.

82.

Rasch

(1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research.

83.

Rasch

(1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Expanded edition). University of Chicago Press.

84.

Reynolds

C. R.

Kamphaus

R. W.

(2015). Reynolds intellectual assessment scales–second edition (RIAS-2). PAR.

85.

Reynolds

M. R.

Keith

T. Z.

Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

(2013). A cross-battery, reference variable, confirmatory factor analytic investigation of the CHC taxonomy. Journal of School Psychology, 51(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.003

86.

Rhodes

Ochoa

S. H.

Ortiz

S. O.

(2005). Assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse students: A practical guide: Guilford Press.

87.

Robinaugh

D. J.

Millner

A. J.

McNally

R. J.

(2016). Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(6), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000181

88.

Sattler

J. M.

(2018). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations and applications (6th ed.). Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher, Inc.

89.

Schalock

R. L.

Luckasson

Tassé

M. J.

(2021). Intellectual disability: Definition, diagnosis, classification, and systems of supports (12th ed.). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

90.

Schatschneider

Fletcher

J. M.

Francis

D. J.

Carlson

C. D.

Foorman

B. R.

(2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265

91.

Schmank

C. J.

Goring

S. A.

Kovacs

Conway

A. R. A.

(2021). Investigating the structure of intelligence using latent variable and psychometric network modeling: A commentary and reanalysis. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010008

92.

Schneider

W. J.

(2016). Strengths and weaknesses of the Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of cognitive abilities: Best practice from a scientist-practitioner perspective. In Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

(Eds.), WJ IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 192–211). Academic Press.

93.

Schneider

W. J.

Flanagan

D. P.

Niileksela

C. R.

Engler

J. R.

(2024). The effect of measurement error on the positive predictive value of PSW methods for SLD identification: How buffer zones dispel the illusion of inaccuracy. Journal of School Psychology, 103, Article 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101280

94.

Schneider

W. J.

McGrew

K. S.

(2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan

D. P.

McDonough

E. M.

(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th edition, pp. 73–163). Guilford Press.

95.

Schrank

F. A.

Decker

S. L.

Garruto

J. M.

(2016). Essentials of WJ IV cognitive abilities assessment. Wiley.

96.

Schrank

F. A.

Mather

McGrew

K. S.

(2014a). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of oral language. Riverside.

97.

Schrank

F. A.

McGrew

K. S.

Mather

(2015). The WJ IV COG Gf-Gc composite and its use in the identification of specific learning disabilities. Riverside Assessments, LLC. (Woodcock-Johnson IV Assessment Service Bulletin No. 3).

98.

Schrank

F. A.

McGrew

K. S.

Mather

(2015). This needs to be 2015b. In Woodcock-Johnson IV: Test of early cognitive and academic development. Riverside.

99.

Schrank

F. A.

Wendling

B. J.

(2015). WJ IV interpretation and instructional interventions program (WIIIP). Riverside Assessments, LLC. [Computer software].

100.

Sweet

J. J.

Peery

Heilbronner

R. L.

(2019). Neuropsychological assessment of cognitive consequences of brain injury and disease. In Matson

J. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of intellectual disabilities: Integrating theory, research, and practice (pp. 461–481). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

101.

Tablante

Krossa

Azimi

Chen

(2023). Dysfunctions associated with the intraparietal sulcus and a distributed network in individuals with math learning difficulties: An ALE meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 44(7), 2726–2740. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26240

102.

U.S. Census Bureau . (2017). 2017 national population projections datasets: Projections for the United States 2017 to 2060. https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2017/demo/popproj/2017-popproj.html

103.

Van der Maas Dolan

C. V.

Grasman

R. P. P. P.

Wicherts

J. M.

Huizenga

H. M.

Raijmakers

M. E. J.

(2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113(4), 842–861.

104.

Vygotsky

L. S.

(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In Cole

John-Steiner

Scribner

Souberman

(Eds.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930–1934).

105.

W3C World Wide Web Consortium . (2023). Web content accessibility Guidelines 2.2. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/

106.

Wagner

R. K.

Torgesen

J. K.

Rashotte

C. A.

Pearson

N. A.

(2013). Comprehensive test of phonological processing, second edition (CTOPP-2). Pro-Ed.

107.

Wechsler

(2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale–fourth edition (WAIS-IV). Pearson.

108.

Wechsler

(2012). Wechsler Preschool and primary scale of intelligence–fourth edition (WPPSI-IV). Pearson.

109.

Wechsler

(2014). Wechsler intelligence scale for children–fifth edition (WISC-V). Pearson.

110.

Willcutt

E. G.

Doyle

A. E.

Nigg

J. T.

Faraone

S. V.

Pennington

B. F.

(2005). Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57(11), 1336–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.006

111.

Wolf

Bowers

P. G.

(1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415

112.

Wolf

Denckla

M. B.

(2005). Rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating Stimulus tests (RAN/RAS) (Pro-Ed). Austin, TX.

113.

Woodcock

R. W.

(2002). New looks in the assessment of cognitive ability. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje7702_3

114.

Woodcock

R. W.

Dahl

M. N.

(1971). A common scale for the measurement of person ability and test item difficulty (AGS paper No. 10). Pearson.

115.

Woodcock

R. W.

Johnson

M. B.

(1977). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Riverside Assessments, LLC.

116.

Woodcock

R. W.

McGrew

K. S.

Mather

(2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV: Reports, recommendations, and strategies. Rolling Meadows. IL: Riverside Publishing.

117.

Woodcock

R. W.

McGrew

K. S.

Mather

Schrank

F. A.

(2007). Woodcock-Johnson III normative update. Riverside Assessments, LLC.

118.

Yang

Siok

W. T.

Tan

L. H.

(2017). Neurobiological bases of reading disorder Part II: The importance of developmental considerations in typical and atypical reading. Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology, 3(4), 131–142.

Overview of the Woodcock-Johnson V Tests of Cognitive Abilities and Virtual Test Library

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References