Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Academic and occupational success requires social intelligence, the ability to comprehend, and manage interpersonal connections. This research aims to assess and improve the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale (TSIS) for Peruvian university students, focusing on cultural adaptability, reliability, and validity. Participants included 973 university students, of whom 64.44% were women (M = 24.96 years, SD = 7.45). CFA and EFA were used to evaluate the TSIS’s three dimensions: Social Awareness, Social Skills, and Social Information Processing. Removed items with low factor loadings or large residual correlations improved validity and clarity. Academic self-efficacy correlations measured content validity, whereas the omega coefficient rated reliability. The improved TSIS has a strong three-factor structure and good model fit (CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.05). Reliability coefficients were 0.70–0.86. Social Awareness had a negative link with academic self-efficacy, suggesting emotional obstacles in academic contexts. Social Skills had a significant relationship. The verified TSIS measures social intelligence in Peruvian university students in a culturally appropriate, reliable manner, promoting academic performance and self-efficacy. Its simplified form makes it practical, and future study should examine its cross-cultural relevance and relationships to other psychological categories.

Keywords

social intelligence Tromsø social intelligence scale validation higher education academic self-efficacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alenezi

Saleh

M. S. M.

Elkalashy

R. A. G.

Wolvaardt

(2020). Predicting effect of emotional-social intelligence on academic achievement of nursing students. African Journal of Health Professions Education, 12(3), 144. https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2020.v12i3.1365

Alkhutaba

(2022). Social intelligence and general self-efficacy as predictors of public speaking skills among university students. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p189

Amrollahifar

Ali

Mansor

Jaharuddin

Guo

(2023). Cognitive, emotional and social intelligence towards job performance: The mediator role of work engagement. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 376–402. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i7/17219

Barnes

M. L.

Sternberg

R. J.

(1989). Social intelligence and decoding of nonverbal cues. Intelligence, 13(3), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(89)90022-6

Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(1993). Testing structural equation models. Sage Publications, Inc.

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.

Byrne

B. M.

(2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor\& Francis Group.

Cartwright

A. D.

Minton

C. A. B.

Reyes

A. G.

Abernathy

Groves

K. K.

(2022). Predictors of social intelligence, empathy, and self-efficacy among sexual offenders. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 43(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaoc.12098

Chater

Rebhi

Saidane

Guelmami

Bouassida

(2023). Reliability and validity of the Tromso social intelligence scale (TSIS). Advances in Physical Education, 13(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2023.131006

10.

Dogan

Cetin

(2009). The validity, reliability and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the Tromso social intelligence scale. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(2), 709–720. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ847775

11.

Dominguez-Laray

Fernández-Arata

, (2019). Autoeficacia académica en estudiantes de Psicología de una universidad de Lima. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 21, e32, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2019.21.e32.2014

12.

Duche

A. B.

Montesinos

M. C.

Rivas

A. M.

Siza

C. H.

(2022). Comprensión lectora inferencial en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 28(6), 181–198. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/280/28073815013/html/

13.

Epskamp

(2015). semPlot: Unified visualizations of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937847

14.

Floyd

F. J.

Widaman

K. F.

(1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286

15.

Ford

M. E.

Tisak

M. S.

(1983). A further search for social intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.2.196

16.

Frankovský

Birknerová

Zbihlejová

Medviď

(2018). Social intelligence in the cultural context: Comparison of Ukrainian and Slovak managers. Economic Annals-XXI, 169(1–2), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V169-12

17.

García-Méndez

R. M.

Rivera-Ledesma

(2020). Autoeficacia en la vida académica y rasgos psicopatológicos. Revista Argentina de Ciencias Del Comportamiento, 12(3), 41–58. https://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/radcc/v12n3/1852-4206-radcc-12-03-00058.pdf

18.

Gardner

(2004). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

19.

Ghaffari

Hajlo

Bayami

(2015). The relationship between social and moral intelligence with academic performance of medical students in Maragheh and Bonab, Iran in 2015. Journal of Nursing Education, 4(3), 48–55. https://jne.ir/article-1-542-en.html.

20.

Gini

(2006). Brief report: Adaptation of the Italian version of the Tromsø social intelligence scale to the adolescent population. Journal of Adolescence, 29(2), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.05.003

21.

González

López

Expósito

Moreno

(2021). The relationship of student academic motivation and perceived self-efficacy with academic performance in distance learning university students. RELIEVE - Revista Electronica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa, 27(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30827/RELIEVE.V27I2.21909

22.

González-Cantero

J. O.

Morón-Vera

J. Á.

González-Becerra

V. H.

Abundis-Gutiérrez

Macías-Espinoza

(2020). Autoeficacia académica, apoyo social académico, bienestar escolar y su relación con el rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios. Psicumex, 10(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.36793/psicumex.v10i2.353

23.

Goswami

(2019). Assessing the factor structure of Tromso Social Intelligence Scale in Indian cultural context. In Proceedings of the International. Conference on Advancements in Computing & Management (ICACM) 2019. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3446597

24.

Grieve

Mahar

(2013). Can social intelligence be measured? Psychometric properties of the Tromsø social intelligence scale--English version. Irish Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2012.737758

25.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

26.

Jain

Bajaj

(2021). Adaptation and validation of the Tromsø social intelligence scale (TSIS): A study of Indian working professionals. Psychology and Education, 58(3), 2433–2443. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3988544

27.

Jůvová

Duda

(2021). Emotional intelligence factors helping teachers cope with emotionally tense situations and enhancing effective pedagogical communication. E-Pedagogium, 21(2), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.5507/epd.2021.024

28.

Kaliska

Salbot

Heinzova

(2019). Replication study of the Slovak MESI scale and its construct validity in two research samples. New Educational Review, 56(2), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2019.56.2.24

29.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

30.

Kosmitzki

John

O. P.

(1993). The implicit use of explicit conceptions of social intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90037-4

31.

Leys

Klein

Dominicy

Ley

(2018). Detecting multivariate outliers: Use a robust variant of the Mahalanobis distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74(3), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.011

32.

C. H.

(2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

33.

Linacre

J. M.

(2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85–106. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292264351_Optimizing_rating_scale_category_effectiveness

34.

Lloret-Segura

Ferreres-Traver

Hernández-Baeza

Tomás-Marco

(2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 1151–1169. https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/ap/v30n3/metodologia1.pdf

35.

Loginova

(2022). Social intelligence and academic performance of students. Pedagogical Education and Science, 3(1), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.56163/2072-2524-2022-3-141-145

36.

Manning

R. P. C.

Dickson

J. M.

Palmier-Claus

Cunliffe

Taylor

P. J.

(2017). A systematic review of adult attachment and social anxiety. Journal of Affective Disorders, 211(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.020

37.

Maxwell

J. A.

(2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.

38.

McDonald

R. P.

(2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press.

39.

Kitayama

Han

Gelfand

M. J.

(2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(50), 15348–15353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509839112

40.

Obeid

Haddad

Akel

Fares

Salameh

Hallit

(2019). Factors associated with the adults’ attachment styles in Lebanon: The role of alexithymia, depression, anxiety, stress, burnout, and emotional intelligence. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 55(4), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12379

41.

Palenzuela

D. L.

(1983). Construcción y validación de una escala de autoeficacia percibida específica de situaciones académicas. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 9(21), 185–219. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-20387-001

42.

Park

S. K.

Yang

Y. K.

Song

(2019). Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Tromsø social intelligence scale. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 28(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.12934/jkpmhn.2019.28.2.165

43.

Raykov

Marcoulides

G. A.

(2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

44.

Revelle

(2025). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (R package version 2.5.6) [Computer software]. Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych

45.

Rosseel

(2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

46.

Rosseel

(2022). lavaan: latent variable analysis. https://lavaan.ugent.be/development.html

47.

RStudio Team . (2023). RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio, PBC.

48.

Savalei

Reise

S. P.

(2019). Don’t forget the model in your model-based reliability coefficients: A reply to McNeish (2018). Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.247

49.

Şener

N. Ü.

Doğan

M. C.

(2021). Investigation of multiple intelligence practises in social studies courses in context of textbooks and teachers’ opinions. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29(3), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.754945

50.

Silvera

D. H.

Martinussen

Dahl

T. I.

(2001). The Tromsø social intelligence Scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00242

51.

Slobodyanik

(2021). Problems of research of social intelligence as a psychological phenomenon. Psychological Journal, 7(9), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2021.7.9.9

52.

Starynska

(2024). Gender characteristics of reflection in higher education students in relation to social intelligence. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16(3), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.3/886

53.

Sternberg

R. J.

Wagner

R. K.

Williams

W. M.

Horvath

J. A.

(1995). Testing common sense. American Psychologist, 50(11), 912–927. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.50.11.912

54.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2013). Cleaning up your act: Screening data prior to analysis. In Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

55.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.

56.

Thorndike

E. L.

(1918). The nature, purposes, and general methods of measurements of educational products. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 19(7), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811801900702

57.

Thorndike

E. L.

(1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper’s Magazine, 140, 227–235. https://gwern.net/doc/iq/1920-thorndike-2.pdf.

58.

Torres

Sosa

M. d. P.

(2020). Emotional intelligence of undergraduate nursing students. Revista Cuidarte, 11(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.993

59.

Ventura-León

(2017). ¿ Componentes principales o factores comunes? Comentarios al artículo de Hederich-Martínez y Caballero-Domínguez (2016). CES Psicología, 10(1), 146–147. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4235/423550874010/html/

60.

Ventura-León

(2024). PsyMetricTools: Psychometric and statistical analysis tools. GitHub. [Software] . https://github.com/jventural/PsyMetricTools

61.

Ventura-León

Caycho-Rodríguez

(2017). El coeficiente Omega: un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 15(1), 625–627. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=77349627039

62.

Viera

A. T.

Machado

R. L.

(2023). Funcionamiento familiar y su relación con la regulación emocional en adolescentes de la ciudad de Ambato. Revista Ecos de La Academia, 9(17), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.53358/ecosacademia.v9i17.835

63.

Widhiarso

Sumintono

(2016). Examining response aberrance as a cause of outliers in statistical analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 98(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.099

64.

Yousif

M. A.

Arbab

A. H.

Yousef

B. A.

(2022). Perceived academic stress, causes, and coping strategies among undergraduate pharmacy students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 13(1), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S350562

65.

Zamfirescu-Mareş

(2024). Social and emotional development in university: Educational training activity for social work program students. Journal Plus Education, 35, 186–203. https://www.uav.ro/jour/index.php/jpe/article/view/1975/1849

66.

Zamorski

M. A.

Ward

R. K.

(2000). Social anxiety disorder: Common, disabling, and treatable. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 13(4), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.3122/15572625-13-4-251

67.

Zulmi

Tentama

(2024). The effect of entrepreneurial readiness, adversity quotient, and social intelligence on employability students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20770

Factor Analysis and Item Reduction of the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale (TSIS) in a Sample Peruvian

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References