Few studies have examined how cognitive-reading relations vary for children and adolescents with different levels of general cognitive ability. This may be instrumental in understanding the development of academic skills and learning difficulties. Research suggests reading development should emphasize the influence of contextual factors that have been featured in prominent theories on cognitive-academic development (e.g., mutualism, Spearman’s law of diminishing returns), which can provide new ways of understanding how cognitive processes influence reading. Moderated nonlinear factor analysis tested whether cognitive-reading relations differed by general ability levels and age using children and adolescents aged 5–18 from the Woodcock–Johnson V standardization sample (N = 3384). Results suggested evidence of general ability level and age moderation of general intelligence and broad ability effects on reading skills. These findings provide a more granular perspective on understanding the cognitive processes that influence reading development and can inform psychoeducational assessment practices.
BauerD. J. (2017). A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000077
2.
BauerD. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: Traditional and new models. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015583
3.
CaemmererJ. M.YoungS. R.MaddocksD.CharamutN. R.BlemahdooE. (2024). Predicting achievement from WISC-V composites: Do cognitive-achievement relations vary based on general intelligence?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 42(4), 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829241240346
4.
CarriganJ. E. (2023). Are the effects of g on achievement smaller at higher ability levels? (Doctoral dissertation).
5.
CattellR. B. (1987). Intelligence: It’s structure, growth, and action. North-Holland.
6.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934
DearyI. J.WeissA.BattyG. D. (2010). Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 11(2), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387081
9.
FlanaganD. P.OrtizS. O.AlfonsoV. C.MascoloJ. T. (2006). The achievement test desk reference: A guide to learning disability identification2nd ed.Wiley.
10.
FloydR. G.KeithT. Z.TaubG. E.McGrewK. S. (2007). Cattell-Horn-carroll cognitive abilities and their effects on reading decoding skills: g has indirect effects, more specific abilities have direct effects. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(2), 200–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.2.200
11.
FriedE. I. (2020). Lack of theory building and testing impedes progress in the factor and network literature. Psychological Inquiry, 31(4), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1853461
12.
GrigorenkoE. L.ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.WagnerR. K.WillcuttE. G.FletcherJ. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000452
13.
HajovskyD.ReynoldsM. R.FloydR. G.TurekJ. J.KeithT. Z. (2014). A multigroup investigation of latent cognitive abilities and reading achievement relations. School Psychology Review, 43(4), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-13-0060.1
14.
HajovskyD. B.NiilekselaC. R.OlsenS. C.SekulaM. K. (2023). Do cognitive–achievement relations vary by general ability level?Journal of Intelligence, 11(9), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11090177
15.
JensenA. R. (1993). The g factor. Praeger.
16.
JensenA. R. (2013). Rushton’s contributions to the study of mental ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.008
17.
KaniukaT. S. (2010). Reading achievement, attitude toward reading, and reading self-esteem of historically low achieving students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(2), 184–188.
18.
KaufmanS. B.ReynoldsM. R.LiuX.KaufmanA. S.McGrewK. S. (2012). Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the woodcock–johnson and kaufman tests. Intelligence, 40(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.009
19.
KeithT. Z. (1999). Effects of general and specific abilities on student achievement: Similarities and differences across ethnic groups. School Psychology Quarterly, 14(3), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0089008
20.
KievitR. A. (2020). Sensitive periods in cognitive development: A mutualistic perspective. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 36, 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.10.007
21.
KievitR. A.HofmanA. D.NationK. (2019). Mutualistic coupling between vocabulary and reasoning in young children: A replication and extension of the study by Kievit et al. 2017. Psychological Science, 30(8), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619841265
22.
KilpatrickD. A. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing, and overcoming reading difficulties. Wiley.
23.
KolbeL.MolenaarD.JakS.JorgensenT. D. (2024). Assessing measurement invariance with moderated nonlinear factor analysis using the R package OpenMx. Psychological Methods, 29(2), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000501
24.
KutnerM.GreenbergE.JinY.BoyleB.HsuY.DunleavyE. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. NCES 2007-490. In National center for education statistics. National Center for Education Statistics.
25.
LaForteE. M.DaileyD.McGrewK. S. (2025). Technical manual. Woodcock-johnson V. Riverside assessments. LLC.
26.
LesnickJ.GoergeR. M.SmithgallC.GwynneJ. (2010). Reading on grade level in third grade: How is it related to high school performance and college enrollment? A longitudinal analysis of third-grade students in Chicago in 1996-97 and their educational outcomes. A Report to the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
27.
MachekG. R.NelsonJ. M. (2010). School psychologists’ perceptions regarding the practice of identifying reading disabilities: Cognitive assessment and response to intervention considerations. Psychology in the Schools, 47(3), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20467
28.
MahonyD. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing, 6(1), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027276
29.
McGillR. J. (2015). Interpretation of KABC-II scores: An evaluation of the incremental validity of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) factor scores in predicting achievement. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1417–1426. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000127
30.
McGrewK. S. (2023). Carroll’s three-stratum (3S) cognitive ability theory at 30 years: Impact, 3S-CHC theory clarification, structural replication, and cognitive-achievement psychometric network analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020032
31.
McGrewK. S.MatherN.LaForteE. M.WendlingB. J. (2025). Woodcock-johnson V. Riverside assessments. LLC.
32.
McGrewK. S.SchneiderW. J.DeckerS. L.BulutO. (2023). A psychometric network analysis of CHC intelligence measures: Implications for research, theory, and interpretation of broad CHC scores “beyond g”. Journal of Intelligence, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010019
33.
McGrewK. S.WendlingB. J. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive-achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 651–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20497
34.
McLarnonM. J. W.GoffinR. D.RothsteinM. G. (2018). Differentiation of cognitive abilities and the medical college admission test. Personality and Individual Differences, 123(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.005
35.
MurrayA. L.JohnsonW. (2013). The limitations of model fit in comparing the bi-factor versus higher-order models of human cognitive ability structure. Intelligence, 41(5), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.06.004
NiilekselaC. R.ReynoldsM. R.KeithT. Z.McGrewK. S. (2016). A special validity study of the Woodcock–Johnson IV: Acting on evidence for specific abilities. In FlanaganD. P.AlfonsoV. C. (Eds.), WJ-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 65–106). Elsevier.
38.
NiilekselaC. R.RobbinsJ.HajovskyD. B.. General ability level moderates cognitive-achievement relations for mathematics. Journal of Intelligence, 13(6), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060065
39.
PengP. (2023). The role of executive function in reading development and reading intervention. Mind, Brain, and Education, 17(4), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12375
40.
PengP.KievitR. A. (2020). The development of academic achievement and cognitive abilities: A bidirectional perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12352
41.
ReschlyA. L. (2010). Reading and school completion: Critical connections and Matthew effects. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 26(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560903397023
42.
ReschlyD. J. (2014). Response to intervention and the identification of specific learning disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000003
43.
ReynoldsM. R.KeithT. Z.RidleyK. P.PatelP. G. (2008). Sex differences in latent general and broad cognitive abilities for children and youth: Evidence from higher-order MG-MACS and MIMIC models. Intelligence, 36(3), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.06.003
44.
SchneiderW. J.McGrewK. S. (2018). The Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In FlanaganD. P.McDonoughE. M. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (4th ed., pp. 73–163). The Guilford Press.
45.
SchneiderW. J.KaufmanA. S. (2017). Let’s not do away with comprehensive cognitive assessments just yet. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 32(1), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw104
46.
SmartD.YoussefG. J.SansonA.PriorM.ToumbourouJ. W.OlssonC. A. (2017). Consequences of childhood reading difficulties and behaviour problems for educational achievement and employment in early adulthood. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 288–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12150
47.
SternbergR. J. (2008). Increasing academic excellence and enhancing diversity are compatible goals. Educational Policy, 22(4), 487–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807310037
48.
van der MaasH. L. J.DolanC. V.GrasmanR. P. P. P.WichertsJ. M.HuizengaH. M.RaijmakersM. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113(4), 842–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842
49.
WilksS. S. (1938). Weighting systems for linear functions of correlated variables when there is no dependent variable. Psychometrika, 3(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287917
50.
ZaboskiB. A.KranzlerJ. H.GageN. A. (2018). Meta-analysis of the relationship between academic achievement and broad abilities of the Cattell-horn-Carroll theory. Journal of School Psychology, 71, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.001
51.
ZhangZ.PengP. (2023). Longitudinal reciprocal relations among reading, executive function, and social-emotional skills: Maybe not for all. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(3), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000787
