Inference is considered an important factor in comprehension models and has been described as a causal factor in predicting comprehension. To date, specific tests for inference are rare and often rely on specific thematic texts. This reliance on thematic inference may raise some concerns as inference is related to prior text-specific knowledge. The Riddle Knowledge Inference Test consists of 14 riddles written in French with different specific topics for each item and was administered to 565 participants in a longitudinal study from grade 2 to grade 5. Both classical test theory and item response theory provide evidence of reliability, with a one-factor solution of = .860 and metric invariance for gender and social background. However, due to the large differences in the level of latent scores between participants, it was not possible to establish a standard setting for each grade.
AhmedY.FrancisD. J.YorkM.FletcherJ. M.BarnesM.KuleszP. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44-45, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002
2.
Badenes-RiberaL.SilverN. C.PedroliE. (2020). Scale development and score validation. Frontiers Media SA.
3.
BarthA. E.BarnesM.FrancisD.VaughnS.YorkM. (2015). Inferential processing among adequate and struggling adolescent comprehenders and relations to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9540-1
4.
BestR. M.FloydR. G.McNamaraD. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951
5.
Bowyer-CraneC.SnowlingM. J. (2005). Assessing children’s inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X22674
6.
BroekP. V. D.BekerK.OudegaM. (2015). Inferences during reading. In O’BrienE. J.CookA. E.LorchR. F. (Eds). Cambridge University Press.
7.
CainK.OakhillJ. V.BarnesM. A.BryantP. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–859. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196414
8.
CaronP.-O. (2019). Minimum average partial correlation and parallel analysis: The influence of oblique structures. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 48(7), 2110–2117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918
9.
ChoE. (2021). Neither cronbach’s alpha nor McDonald’s omega: A commentary on sijtsma and pfadt. Psychometrika, 86(4), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09801-1
10.
ChrysochoouE.BablekouZ.TsigilisN. (2011). Working memory contributions to reading comprehension components in middle childhood children. American Journal of Psychology, 124(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.3.0275
ClintonV.TaylorT.BajpayeeS.DavisonM. L.CarlsonS. E.SeipelB. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 33(9), 2223–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10044-2
13.
CromleyJ. G.AzevedoR. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
14.
CromleyJ. G.Snyder-HoganL. E.Luciw-DubasU. A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019452
15.
CurrieN. K.CainK. (2015). Children’s inference generation: The role of vocabulary and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.005
16.
DaugaardH. T.CainK.ElbroC. (2017). From words to text: Inference making mediates the role of vocabulary in children’s reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 30(8), 1773–1788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9752-2
17.
DimaA. L. (2018). Scale validation in applied health research: Tutorial for a 6-step r-based psychometrics protocol. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 136–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850
18.
ElbroC.Buch-IversenI. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
19.
EllemanA. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180
20.
EverittB. S.SkrondalA. (2010). The cambridge dictionary of statistics. Cambridge University Press.
21.
Filiatrault-VeilleuxP.BouchardC.TrudeauN.DesmaraisC. (2015). Inferential comprehension of 3–6 year olds within the context of story grammar: A scoping review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(6), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12175
22.
GerrigR. J.WenzelW. G. (2015). Inferences during reading. In O’BrienE. J.CookA. E.LorchR. F. (Eds). Cambridge University Press.
23.
GilliamS.MaglianoJ. P.MillisK. K.LevinsteinI.BoonthumC. (2007). Assessing the format of the presentation of text in developing a reading strategy assessment tool (r-SAT). Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193148
24.
GraesserA. C.SingerM.TrabassoT. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
25.
HallC.VaughnS.BarnesM. A.StewartA. A.AustinC. R.RobertsG. (2020). The effects of inference instruction on the reading comprehension of English learners with reading comprehension difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41(5), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518824983
26.
JosseJ.HussonF. (2012). Handling missing values in exploratory multivariate data analysis methods. Journal de la Société Française de Statistique, 153(2), 79–99.
27.
JusticeL. M.ChowS.-M.CapelliniC.FlaniganK.ColtonS. (2003). Emergent literacy intervention for vulnerable preschoolers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(3), 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2003/078)
28.
KendeouP. (2015). A general inference skill. In Inferences during reading (pp. 160–181). Cambridge University Press.
29.
KendeouP.Bohn-GettlerC.WhiteM. J.Van Den BroekP. (2008). Children’s inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00370.x
30.
KendeouP.McMasterK. L.ButterfussR.KimJ.SlaterS.BulutO. (2021). Development and validation of the Minnesota inference assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 47(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508420937781
31.
KendeouP.McMasterK. L.ChristT. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624707
32.
KintschW. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
33.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension : A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
34.
KopatichR. D.MaglianoJ. P.MillisK. K.ParkerC. P.RayM. (2019). Understanding how language-specific and domain-general resources support comprehension. Discourse Processes, 56(7), 530–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1519358
35.
LepolaJ.LynchJ.LaakkonenE.SilvénM.NiemiP. (2012). The role of inference making and other language skills in the development of narrative listening comprehension in 4-6-year-old children. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.020
36.
LinacreJ. (2011). A user’s guide to winsteps: Rasch-model computer programs.
MaglianoJ. P.MillisK. K.LevinsteinI.BoonthumC. (2011). Assessing comprehension during reading with the reading strategy assessment tool (RSAT). Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9064-2
39.
MaglianoJ. P.RayM.MillisK. K. (2016). The reading strategy assessment tool: A computer-based approach for evaluating comprehension processes during reading. In Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 282–287). Routledge.
40.
MaguetM. L.MorrisonT. G.WilcoxB.BillenM. T. (2021). Improving children’s reading comprehension by teaching inferences. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 264–280. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:232411526.
41.
MarR. A.LiJ.NguyenA. T.TaC. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 732–749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1
42.
McGeeA.JohnsonH. (2003). The effect of inference training on skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410303220
43.
McNamaraD. S.MaglianoJ. (2009). Chapter 9 toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Academic Press.
44.
McNamaraD. S.VegaM.O’ReillyT. (2007). Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes. In SchmalhoferF.Perfetti, (Eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
45.
MetsämuuronenJ. (2020). Somers’ d as an alternative for the item-test and item-rest correlation coefficients in the educational measurement settings. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.207
46.
MorgadoF. F.MeirelesJ. F.NevesC. M.AmaralA.FerreiraM. E. (2017). Scale development: Ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Reflexão e Crítica.
47.
MorrisonT. G.WilcoxB.SudweeksR. R.BirdL.MurdochE.BurseyH.HelveyM. (2022). Assessment of inference types (ait): A new test for measuring how well students make inferences. Reading Psychology, 43(5-6), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2094042
48.
MuijselaarM. M. L.Language and Reading Research Consortium (2018). The dimensionality of inference making: Are local and global inferences distinguishable?Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1371179
49.
OakhillJ. V.CainK. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. In McNamaraD. S., (Ed). Psychology Press.
50.
OakhillJ. V.CainK. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
51.
OakhillJ. V.CainK. (2018). Children’s problems with inference making: Causes and consequences. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 49(4), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201806_49(4).0008
52.
O’connorB. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807
53.
PikeM. M.BarnesM. A.BarronR. W. (2010). The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.006
54.
SmithR.SnowP.SerryT.HammondL. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711
55.
StreinerD. L.NormanG. R.CairneyJ. (2024). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press.
56.
TarchiC. (2015). Fostering reading comprehension of expository texts through the activation of readers’ prior knowledge and inference-making skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.013
57.
Van den BroekP. (1989). Causal reasoning and inference making in judging the importance of story statements. Child Development, 60(2), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130976
58.
Van den BroekP.FletcherC. R.RisdenK. (1993). Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes, 16(1-2), 1993. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544835
59.
Van Den BroekP.KendeouP.KremerK.LynchJ.ButlerJ.WhiteM. J.LorchE. P. (2005). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In ParisS. G.StahlS. A. (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 125–148). Routledge.
60.
VelicerW. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41(3), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293557
61.
VelicerW. F.EatonC. A.FavaJ. L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at Seventy. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
62.
WiigE.SecordW. (2014). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals metalinguistics. NCS Pearson.
63.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
64.
YuillN.OakhillJ. V. (1988). Effects of inference awareness training on poor reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350020105
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
