Since classroom climate is inherently a group level phenomenon, we argue that measures shown to be valid and reliable in multi-level settings are needed. We propose a brief, 5-item measure of classroom climate and demonstrate its reliability and validity in multi-level structural equation models. The measure demonstrated good reliability and we also show the measure’s relationship to a key student outcome, social emotional learning (SEL) knowledge. In classrooms with higher climate levels, fourth grade students are more likely to have higher SEL knowledge.
BarksdaleC.PetersM.CorralesA. (2021). Middle school students’ perceptions of classroom climate and its relationship to achievement. Educational Studies, 47(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1664411
2.
BearG.YangC.MantzL.PasipanodyaE.HearnS.BoyerD. (2014). Technical manual for Delaware school survey: Scales of school climate, bullying victimization, student engagement, and positive, punitive, and social emotional learning techniques. In Delaware positive behavior support (DE-PBS) and school climate transformation projects. Available at: https://wordpress.oet.udel.edu/pbs/technical-manual-for-school-climate-surveys/
3.
ChristO.HewstoneM.SchmidK.GreenE.SarrasinO.GollwitzerM.WagnerU. (2017). Advanced multilevel modeling for a science of groups: A short primer on multilevel structural equation modeling. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 21(3), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000065
4.
CoombesL.BristoweK.Ellis-SmithC.AworindeJ.FraserL. K.Bluebond-LangnerM.ChambersL.MurtaghF. E. M.HardingR. (2021). Enhancing validity, reliability and participation in self-reported health outcome measurement for children and young people: A systematic review of recall period, response scale format, and administration modality. Quality of Life Research, 30(7), 1830–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02814-4
5.
DyerN. G.HangesP. J.HallR. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009
6.
FauthB.DecristanJ.RieserS.KliemeE.ButtnerG. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
GeldhofG. J.PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
9.
KincadeL.CookC.GoerdtA. (2020). Meta-analysis and common practice elements of universal approaches to improving student-teacher relationships. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 710–748. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320946836
10.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.RobitzschA.TrautweinU.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O.NagengastB. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 764–802.
11.
McKownC. (2019). Reliability, factor structure, and measurement invariance of a web-based assessment of children’s social-emotional comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(4), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917749682
12.
McKownC.Russo-PonsaranN.KarlsA. (2023). Web-based assessment of social and emotional competence in the late elementary grades. Social Development, 32(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12641
13.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2020). Mplus users guide (8th ed.).
14.
QuinD. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
15.
Rimm-KaufmanS. E.BaroodyA. E.LarsenR. A. A.CurbyT. W.AbryT. (2015). To what extent do teacher–student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning?Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037252
16.
Rubie-DaviesC.AsilM.TeoT. (2016). Assessing measurement invariance of the student personal perception of classroom climate across different ethnic groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(5), 442–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915612689
17.
SchweigJ.HamiltonL. S.BakerG. (2019). School and classroom climate measures: Considerations for use by state and local education leaders. RAND Corporation.
18.
Sean-KearneyW.SmithP. A.MaikaS. (2016). Asking students their opinions of the learning environment: An empirical analysis of elementary classroom climate. Educational Psychology in Practice, 32(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2016.1173015
19.
SriklaubK.WongwanichS.WiratchaiN. (2015). Development of the classroom climate measurement model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171(16), 1353–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.253
20.
WangM. T.DegolL.AmemiyaJ.ParrA.GuoJ. (2020). Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 57, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100912
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
