This study assesses the psychometric properties of the School Support Scale (SSS), part of the CHKS’s Resilience Youth Development Module (RYDM; Furlong et al., 2009), among 231 sixth- and seventh-grade students in urban public schools in Chile. Results indicated satisfactory psychometric properties, replicating a unifactorial structure observed in prior research (Hanson & Kim, 2007), where items related to caring relationships and high expectations loaded onto a single factor, school support. Significant correlations were found with measures of life satisfaction and school-related affect. These findings underscore the scale’s utility in evaluating student perceptions of school support and highlight avenues for future research to enhance its applicability across diverse educational contexts.
AliverniniF.CavicchioloE.ManganelliS.ChiricoA.LucidiF. (2019). Support for autonomy at school predicts immigrant adolescents’ psychological well-being. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 21(4), 761–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0839-x
2.
Batista-FoguetJ. M.CoendersG. (2000). Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales. La Muralla.
3.
BenaventeD. M.CovaF.Pérez-SalasC. P.VarelaJ. J.AlfaroJ.ChuecasJ. (2018). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala Breve de Bienestar Subjetivo en la Escuela para Adolescentes (BASWBSS) en una muestra de adolescentes Chilenos [Psychometric properties of the Brief Adolescents' Subjective Well-Being in School Scale (BASWBSS) in a sample of Chilean adolescents]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion Psicologica, 48(3), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP48.3.05
4.
BenaventeM.CovaF.AlfaroJ.VarelaJ. (2018). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida de los Estudiantes (SLSS) de Huebner en una muestra de adolescentes chilenos. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion Psicologica, 50(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP50.1.05
5.
BentlerP. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400-404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400
6.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
7.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. In Basic concepts, Applications and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
8.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (2016). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. In KazdinA. E. (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-012
9.
ElmoreG. M.HuebnerE. S. (2010). Adolescents' satisfaction with school experiences: Relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and school engagement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47(6), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20488
10.
FedericiR.SkaalvikE. (2014). Students’ perceptions of emotional and instrumental teacher support: Relations with motivational and emotional responses. International Education Studies, 7(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n1p21
11.
FurlongM.O'BrennanL.YouS. (2011). Psychometric properties of the add health school connectedness scale for 18 sociocultural groups. Psychology in the Schools, 48(10), 986–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20609
12.
FurlongM.RitcheyK.O’BrennanL. (2009). Developing norms for the California resilience youth development Module: Internal assets and school resources subscales. California School Psychologist, 14(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340949
13.
GalindezE.CasasF. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS) con adolescentes. Estudios de Psicología, 1(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093910790744617
14.
GutiérrezM.TomásJ.-M.RomeroI.BarricaJ.-M. (2017). Perceived social support, school engagement and satisfaction with school. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 22(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2017.05.001
15.
HansonT. L.KimJ. O. (2007). Measuring resilience and youth development: The psychometric properties of the Healthy Kids Survey. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 034). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
16.
HarandiT.TaghinasabM.NayeriT. (2017). The correlation of social support with mental health: A meta-analysis. Electronic Psysician, 9(9), 5212–5222. https://doi.org/10.19082/5212
17.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
18.
HuebnerS. (1991). Initial development of the student’s life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 12(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034391123010
19.
JiaM.ChengJ. (2024). Effect of teacher social support on students’ emotions and learning engagement: A U.S.-Chinese classroom investigation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02634-0
20.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
21.
LittlecottH.MooreG.MurphyS. (2018). Student health and well-being in secondary schools: The role of school support staff alongside teaching staff. Pastoral Care in Education, 36(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2018.1528624
22.
LozanoV.EkornesS.GamlemS.TorrissenW.SynnevagH. (2023). Perceived teacher support in secondary education from 1980 to 2019: An integrative review. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2164648. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2164648
23.
MartinotD.SicardA.GulB.YakimovaS.Taillandier-SchmittA.MaintenantC. (2022). Peers and teachers as the best source of social support for school engagement for both advantaged and priority education area students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 958286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958286
24.
SuldoS.FriedrichA.WhiteT.FarmerJ.MinchD.MichalowskiJ. (2009). Teacher support and adolescents’ subjective well-being: A mixed-methods investigation. School Psychology Review, 38(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2009.12087850
25.
TennantJ.DemarayM.MaleckiC.TerryM.ClaryM.ElzingaN. (2015). Students’ ratings of teacher support and academic and social-emotional well-being. School Psychologist, 30(4), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000106
26.
TianL.WangD.HuebnerS. (2014). Development and validation of the brief adolescents’ subjective well-being in school scale (BASWBSS). Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0603-0
27.
TomásJ.GutiérrezM.PastorA.SanchoP. (2020). Perceived social support, school adaptation and adolescents’ subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research, 13(5), 1597–1617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09717-9
