The Grit-short scale measures consistency and perseverance for long-term goals. In the present study, we translated and adapted the Grit-short scale into Hindi (Grit-SH) and examined its within-network and between-network construct validity among Indian adolescents. The participants were 534 senior secondary school students aged 14 – 18 years recruited from five schools across two samples. Grit-SH, along with the brief inventory of thriving and student satisfaction scale, was administered in sample 1 (N1= 310), whereas in sample 2 (N2 = 224), the English version of the Grit-short scale was used. Regarding within-network construct validity, the two-dimensional structure of Grit-SH demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data, partially strict invariance against its English version, and good internal consistency reliability. In terms of between-network construct validity, grit demonstrated a significantly positive correlation with student satisfaction and well-being. Overall, findings indicated that the Grit-SH is a valid and reliable measure of grit that researchers and practitioners can use to assess grit among Indian adolescents.
BaeS.-W.KimJ. G.ParkB.-S.LeeK.ParkJ. (2024). Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the short form of grit scale in Korean adolescents. PLoS One, 19(1), Article e0296795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296795
2.
BowmanN. A.HillP. L.DensonN.BronkemaR. (2015). Keep on truckin’ or stay the course? Exploring grit dimensions as differential predictors of educational achievement, satisfaction, and intentions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615574300
3.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
4.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
5.
DatuJ. A. D.KingR. B.ValdezJ. P. M.EalaM. S. M. (2019). Grit is associated with lower depression via meaning in life among Filipino high school students. Youth & Society, 51(6), 865–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18760402
6.
DatuJ. A. D.ValdezJ. P. M.KingR. B. (2016a). Perseverance counts but consistency does not! Validating the short grit scale in a collectivist setting. Current Psychology, 35(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9374-2
7.
DatuJ. A. D.YuenM.ChenG. (2016b). Exploring determination for long-term goals in a collectivist context: A qualitative study. Current Psychology, 37(1), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9509-0
8.
DebS.StrodlE.SunJ. (2015). Academic stress, parental pressure, anxiety and mental health among Indian high school students. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 5(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijpbs.20150501.04
9.
DimitrovD. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct Validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459
10.
DisabatoD. J.GoodmanF. R.KashdanT. B. (2019). Is grit relevant to well‐being and strengths? Evidence across the globe for separating perseverance of effort and consistency of interests. Journal of Personality, 87(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12382
11.
DuckworthA. L.PetersonC.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
12.
DuckworthA. L.QuinnP. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (grit–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290
13.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
14.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation models. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). IAP Information Age Publishing.
15.
FischerR.KarlJ. A. (2019). A primer to (cross-cultural) multi-group invariance testing possibilities in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(Aritcle), 1507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01507
16.
GignacG. E.SzodoraiE. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102(11), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
17.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, Behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage.
18.
LanceC. E.ButtsM. M.MichelsL. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say?Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919
19.
LiJ.ZhaoY.KongF.DuS.YangS.WangS. (2018). Psychometric assessment of the short grit scale among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(3), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916674858
20.
LounsburyJ. W.SaudargasR. A.GibsonL. W.LeongF. T. (2005). An investigation of broad and narrow personality traits in relation to general and domain-specific life satisfaction of college students. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 707–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-4140-6
21.
MartinA. J.MarshH. W. (2008). Workplace and academic buoyancy: Psychometric assessment and construct validity amongst school personnel and students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(2), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282907313767
22.
NishikawaK.KusumiT.ShirakawaT. (2022). The effect of two aspects of grit on developmental change in high school students’ academic performance: Findings from a five-wave longitudinal study over the course of three years. Personality and Individual Differences, 191(6), 111557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111557
23.
OriolX.MirandaR.OyanedelJ. C.TorresJ. (2017). The role of self-control and grit in domains of school success in students of primary and secondary school. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01716
24.
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review: Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
25.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
26.
ShabanN. M. (2020). Validation of grit scale in the Arabian context for Egyptian players. Science, Movement and Health, 20(2), 153–157.
SinghK.JunnarkarM.MitraS. (2018). Validation of Hindi translated scales on grit, resilience and well-being. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 44(1), 89–98.
29.
SousaV. D.RojjanasriratW. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
30.
SuR.TayL.DienerE. (2014). The development and validation of the comprehensive inventory of thriving (CIT) and the brief inventory of thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6(3), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12027
31.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
32.
VermaJ.TriandisH. C. (2000). The measurement of collectivism in India. In LonnerW. J.DinnelD. L.ForgaysD.HayesS. A. (Eds.), Merging past, present, and future in cross-cultural psychology: Selected papers from the fourteenth international congress of the international association for cross-cultural psychology (pp. 256–265). Garland Science.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
