This study described the development of a culturally adapted video version of Strange Stories test as a measure of advanced theory of mind for youths in an Asian country (i.e. Singapore), the Y-ToM, and to provide preliminary psychometric properties. Participants were 170 youths (82 male, 88 female) aged from 13 to 16 years old (M = 14.77, SD = 1.16) in Singapore. The youths completed the Y-ToM, an abbreviated IQ test and the Happé’s Strange Stories in a counterbalanced order while their parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). A two-factor structure consisting of social and physical subscales was suggested. Concurrent, convergent, divergent and diagnostic validity of the Y-ToM was examined. Internal consistency of the Y-ToM social subscale was acceptable though it was not satisfactory for the Y-ToM physical subscale. Inter-rater reliability was good while test-retest reliability was lower.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school-age forms &; Profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth and Families.
2.
AngR. P.RescorlaL. A.AchenbachT. M.OoiY. P.FungD. S.WooB. (2012). Examining the criterion validity of CBCL and TRF problem scales and items in a large Singapore sample. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 43(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-011-0253-2
3.
ApperlyI (2010). Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of“ theory of mind”. Psychology Press.
4.
ApperlyI. A (2012). What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.676055
5.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.HillJ.RasteY.PlumbI. (2001). The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021963001006643
6.
Białecka-PikulM.KołodziejczykA.BosackiS. (2017). Advanced theory of mind in adolescence: Do age, gender and friendship style play a role?Journal of Adolescence, 56(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.02.009
7.
BrewerN.YoungR. L. (2015). Crime and autism spectrum disorder: Myths and mechanisms. Jessica Kingsley.
8.
BrewerN.YoungR. L.BarnettE. (2017). Measuring theory of mind in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(7), 1927–1941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3080-x
9.
CaleroC.SallesA.SemelmanM.SigmanM. (2013). Age and gender dependent development of Theory of Mind in 6-to 8-year’s old children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00281
10.
CameronC. A.LauC.FuG.LeeK. (2012). Development of children’s moral evaluations of modesty and self-promotion in diverse cultural settings. Journal of Moral Education, 41(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2011.617414
11.
CheungH.SiuT. S. C.ChenL. (2015). The roles of liar intention, lie content, and theory of mind in children’s evaluation of lies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.002
12.
CookD. A.BrydgesR.GinsburgS.HatalaR. (2015). A contemporary approach to validity arguments: A practical guide to Kane’s framework. Medical Education, 49(6), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12678
13.
DevineR. T.HughesC. (2016). Measuring theory of mind across middle childhood: Reliability and validity of the silent films and strange stories tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.011
14.
DziobekIFleckSKalbeERogersKHassenstabJBrandMKesslerJ.WoikeJ. K.WolfOTConvitA. (2006). Introducing MASC: A movie for the assessment of social cognition. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(5), 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0107-0
15.
HappéF. G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093
16.
HaywardE. O.HomerB. D. (2017). Reliability and validity of advanced theory-of-mind measures in middle childhood and adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12186
17.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
18.
KaneM. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000
19.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
20.
LecceS.CeccatoI.CavalliniE. (2019). Theory of mind, mental state talk and social relationships in aging: The case of friendship. Aging & Mental Health, 23(9), 1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1487270
21.
LenoV. C.ChandlerS.WhiteP.YorkeI.CharmanT.JonesC. R. G.HappeF.BairdG.PicklesA.SimonoffE (2020). Associations between theory of mind and conduct problems in autistic and nonautistic youth. Autism Research, 14(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2346
22.
LivingstonL. A.CarrB.ShahP. (2019). Recent advances and new directions in measuring theory of mind in autistic adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(4), 1738–1744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3823-3
23.
MaF.XuF.HeymanG. D.LeeK. (2011). Chinese children’s evaluations of white lies: Weighing the consequences for recipients. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.015
24.
McCrimmonA. W.SmithA. D. (2013). Review of the Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence, second edition (WASI-II). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(3), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912467756
25.
McDonaldR. P (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press.
26.
Meinhardt-InjacB.DaumM. M.MeinhardtG. (2020). Theory of mind development from adolescence to adulthood: Testing the two-component model. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 38(2), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12320
27.
MokkinkL. B.TerweeC. B.PatrickD. L.AlonsoJ.StratfordP. W.KnolD. L.BouterL. M.de VetH. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
28.
MurrayK.JohnstonK.CunnaneH.KerrC.SpainD.GillanN.HammondN.MurphyD.HappéF. (2017). A new test of advanced theory of mind: The “strange stories film task” captures social processing differences in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 10(6), 1120–1132. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1744
29.
MuthénB. O.MuthénL. K (2017). Mplus (version 8). Muthén & Muthén.
30.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
31.
O’HareA. E.BremnerL.NashM.HappéF.PettigrewL. M. (2009). A clinical assessment tool for advanced theory of mind performance in 5 to 12 year olds. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(6), 916–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0699-2
32.
OoiY. P.RescorlaL.AngR. P.WooB.FungD. S. (2011). Identification of autism spectrum disorders using the child behavior checklist in Singapore. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(9), 1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1015-x
RescorlaL.AchenbachT.IvanovaM. Y.DumenciL.AlmqvistF.BilenbergN.BirdH.Wei ChenW.DobreanA.DöpfnerM.ErolN.FombonneE.FonsecaA.FrigerioA.GrietensH.HannesdottirH.KanbayashiY.LambertM.LarssonB. O.VerhulstF. (2007). Behavioral and emotional problems reported by parents of children ages 6 to 16 in 31 societies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15(3), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266070150030101
36.
SalischM.ZemanJ.LuepschenN.KanevskiR. (2014). Prospective relations between adolescents’ social-emotional competencies and their friendships. Social Development, 23(4), 684–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12064
37.
ShahrivarZ.Tehrani-DoostM.Khorrami BanarakiA.MohammadzadehA.HappéF. (2017). Normative data and psychometric properties of a Farsi translation of the strange stories test. Autism Research, 10(12), 1960–1967. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1844
38.
SlaughterV.Perez-ZapataD. (2014). Cultural variations in the development of mind reading. Child Development Perspectives, 8(4), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12091
WechslerD. (2011). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence–second edition (WASI-II). Pearson.
41.
WhiteS.HillE.HappéF.FrithU. (2009). Revisiting the strange stories: Revealing mentalizing impairments in autism. Child Development, 80(4), 1097–1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8624.2009.01319.x
42.
WoltersN.KnoorsH.CillessenA. H. N.VerhoevenL. (2014). Behavioral, personality, and communicative predictors of acceptance and popularity in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(5), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613510403
43.
ZainalN. H.NewmanM. G (2018). Worry amplifies theory-of-mind reasoning for negatively valenced social stimuli in generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227(Suppl C), 824–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.084
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
