Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (LSI) continues to generate a great debate among researchers, given the contradictory evidence resulting from its psychometric properties. One primary criticism focuses on the artificiality of the results derived from its internal structure because of the ipsative nature of the forced-choice format. This study seeks to contribute to the resolution of this debate. A short version of Kolb’s LSI with a forced-choice format and an additional inventory scored on a Likert scale was completed by a sample of students of the University Católica del Norte in Antofagasta, Chile. The data obtained from the two forms of the reduced version of the LSI were compared using principal component analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and the Thurstonian Item Response Theory model. The results support the hypothesis of the existence of four learning mode dimensions. However, they do not support the existence of the learning styles as proposed by Kolb, indicating that said reports are the product of the artificial structure generated by the ipsative forced-choice format.
AitchinsonJ. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall.
2.
ArmstrongS. J. (2000). The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 323-339. doi:10.1080/014434100750018020
3.
AtkinsonG.MurrellP. H.WintersM. R. (1990). Career personality types and learning styles. Psychological Reports, 66(1), 160-162. doi:10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.160
4.
BaronH. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 49-56. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00599.x
5.
BartramD. (1996). The relationship between ipsatized and normative measures of personality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 25-39. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00597.x
6.
BartramD. (2007). Increasing validity with forced-choice criterion measurement formats. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(3), 263-272. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00386.x
7.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
8.
BitranC.ZúñigaD.LafuenteM.VivianiP.MenaB (2003). Tipos psicológicos y estilos de aprendizaje de los estudiantes que ingresan a medicina en la pontificia universidad católica de Chile (psychological types and learning styles of students entering medical school at the Pontificia Universidad Católica of Chile). Revista médica de Chile, 131(9), 1067-1078. doi:10.4067/S0034-98872003000900015
9.
BrewC. R. (2002). Kolb's learning style instrument: Sensitive to gender. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 373-390. doi:10.1177/0013164402062002011
10.
BrownA.Maydeu-OlivaresA. (2011). Item response modeling of forced-choice questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(3), 460-502. doi:10.1177/0013164410375112
11.
BrownA.Maydeu-OlivaresA. (2012). Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using mplus. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1135-1147. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0217-x
12.
CalderónC.XiménezC (2014). Análisis factorial de ítems de respuesta forzada: una revisión y un ejemplo (factor analysis of forced-choice items: A review and an example). Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46(1), 24-341. doi:10.1016/S0120-0534(14)70003-2
ChanW. (2003). Analyzing ipsative data in psychological research. Behaviormetrika, 30(1), 99-121 doi:10.2333/bhmk.30.99
15.
ChanW.BentlerP. M. (1993). The covariance structure analysis of ipsative data. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(2), 214-247. doi:10.1177/0049124193022002003
16.
CheungM. W.-L.ChanW. (2002). Reducing uniform response bias with ipsative measurement in multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 55-77. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0901_4
17.
ClemansW. V. (1966). An analytical and empirical examination of some properties of ipsative measures psychometric monographs (Vol. 14). Psychometric Society.
18.
ClossS. J. (1996). On the factoring and interpretation of ipsative data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 41-47. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00598.x
19.
CoffieldF.MoseleyHallD.E.EcclestoneK. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skill Research Centre.
20.
CornwellJ. M.DunlapW. P. (1994). On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: A response to Saville & Willson (1991). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(1), 89-100. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00553.x
21.
CornwellJ. M.ManfredoP. A.DunlapW. P. (1991). Factor analysis of the 1985 revision of Kolb's learning style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 455-462. doi:10.1177/0013164491512020
22.
DiamantopoulosA.SiguawJ. (2000). Introducing lisrel: A guide for the uninitiated introducing statistical methods series. SAGE.
23.
DunlapW. P.CornwellJ. M. (1994). Factor analysis of ipsative measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(1), 115-126. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2901_4
24.
GeigerM. A.BoyleE. J.PintoJ. (1992). A factor analysis of Kolb'S revised learning style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(3), 753-759. doi:10.1177/0013164492052003026
25.
GeigerM. A.BoyleE. J.PintoJ. K. (1993). An examination of ipsative and normative versions of Kolb'S revised learning tyle inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 717-726. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003016
26.
GreenD. W.SnellJ. C.ParimanathA. R. (1990). Learning styles in assessment of students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70(2), 363-369. doi:10.2466/pms.1990.70.2.363
27.
HainerE. V. (1992). Cognitive and learning styles of high school students: Implications for ESL curriculum development. In ReidJ. M. (ed), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 48-62). Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
28.
HalsteadA.MartinL. (2002). Learning styles: A tool for selecting students for group work. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 39(3), 245-252. doi:10.7227/ijeee.39.3.8
29.
HatcherJ. A.BringleR. G. (1997). Reflection: Bridging the gap between service and learning. College Teaching, 45(4), 153-158. doi:10.1080/87567559709596221
30.
HealeyM.JenkinsA. (2000). Kolb's experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of geography, 99(5), 185-195. doi:10.1080/00221340008978967
31.
HensonR. K.HwangD.-Y. (2002). Variability and prediction of measurement error in Kolb's learning style inventory scores a reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 712-727. doi: 10.1177/0013164402062004011.
32.
HicksL. E. (1970). Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. Psychological Bulletin, 74(3), 167-184. doi:10.1037/h0029780
33.
HonigsfeldA.SchieringM. (2004). Diverse approaches to the diversity of learning styles in teacher education. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 487-507. doi:10.1080/0144341042000228861
34.
HuL. t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
35.
KatzN. (1986). Time needed to learn as a function of individual learning style and teaching method. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 12(2), 237-239. doi:10.1016/0191-491x(86)90014-3
36.
KayesD. C. (2005). Internal validity and reliability of Kolb's learning style inventory Version 3 (1999). Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2), 249-257. doi:10.1007/s10869-005-8262-4
37.
KolbD. A. (1976a). Learning style inventory technical manual. McBer.
38.
KolbD. A. (1976b). Learning style inventory: Technical manual. Hay Group.
39.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
40.
KolbD. A. (1985). Learning style inventory: Technical manual. Hay Group.
41.
KolbD. A. (1999). Learning style inventory, version 3. The Hay Group.
42.
KoobJ. J.FunkJ. (2002). Kolb's learning style inventory: Issues of reliability and validity. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(2), 293-308. doi:10.1177/104973150201200206
43.
LooR. (1996). Construct validity and classification stability of the revised learning style inventory (LSI-1985). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(3), 529-536. doi:10.1177/0013164496056003015
44.
LooR. (1999). Confirmatory factor analyses of Kolb's learning style inventory (LSI-1985). British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(2), 213-219. doi:10.1348/000709999157680
45.
LooR (2004). Kolb’s learning style and learning preferences: Is there a linkage?. Educational Psychology, 24(1), 99-108. doi:10.1080/0144341032000146476
46.
MarshallJ. C.MerrittS. L. (1985). Reliability and construct validity of alternate forms of the learning style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(4), 931-937. doi:10.1177/0013164485454025
47.
MarshallJ. C.MerrittS. L. (1986). Reliability and construct validity of the learning style questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46(1), 257-262. doi:10.1177/0013164486461031
48.
Maureira CidF.BahamondesV. (2013). Estilos de aprendizaje de Kolb de estudiantes de educación física de la UMCE y UISEK de Chile (Styles of Kolb`s learning of students of physical education of the UMCE and UISEK of Chile). Revista de Estilos de Aprendizaje, 11(6), 139-149.
49.
Maureira CidF.Flores FerroE.González FloresP.Palma GajardoE.Fernández RebolledoM.Véliz VélizC. (2018). Propiedades psicométricas del inventario de estilos de aprendizaje de Kolb y del cuestionario de Felder-Silverman en estudiantes de educación física de Santiago de Chile. Revista Ciencias de la Actividad Física, 19(1), 1-11. doi:10.29035/rcaf.19.1.5
50.
Maydeu-OlivaresA.BöckenholtU. (2005). Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 285-304. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.10.3.285
51.
Maydeu-OlivaresA.BrownA. (2010). Item response modeling of paired comparison and ranking data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(6), 935-974. doi:10.1080/00273171.2010.531231
52.
McGoldrickK.BattleA.GallagherS. (2000). Service-learning and the economics course: Theory and practice. The American Economist, 44(1), 43-52. doi:10.1177/056943450004400106
53.
MerritS. L.MarshallJ. C. (1984). Reliability and construct validity of ipsative and normative forms of the learning style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44(2), 463-472. doi:10.1177/0013164484442028
54.
MetallidouP.PlatsidouM. (2008). Kolb's learning style inventory-1985: Validity issues and relations with metacognitive knowledge about problem-solving strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.001
PhilbinM.MeierE.HuffmanS.BoverieP. (1995). A survey of gender and learning styles. Sex Roles, 32(7-8), 485-494. doi:10.1007/bf01544184
57.
PickworthG. E.SchoemanW. J. (2000). The psychometric properties of the learning style inventory and the learning style questionnaire: Two normative measures of learning styles. South African Journal of Psychology, 30(2), 44-52. doi:10.1177/008124630003000206
58.
PriceL (2004). Individual differences in learning: Cognitive control, cognitive style, and learning style. Educational Psychology, 24(5), 681-698. doi:10.1080/0144341042000262971
59.
RakoczyM.MoneyS. (1995). Learning styles of nursing students: A 3-year cohort longitudinal study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(3), 170-174. doi:10.1016/s8755-7223(95)80116-2
60.
RodríguezH.PirulJ.RoblesJ.PérezL.VásquezE.GalazI.CuellarC.DíazH.ArriazaC. (2018). Análisis de los estilos de aprendizaje en alumnos de medicina de la Universidad de Chile. Educación Médica, 19(1), 2-8. doi:10.1016/j.edumed.2016.11.004
61.
RubleT. L.StoutD. E. (1990). Reliability, construct validity, and response- set bias of the revised learning-style inventory (LSI-1985). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50(3), 619-629. doi:10.1177/0013164490503018
62.
SeveriensS. E.Ten DamG. T. M. (1994). Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education, 27(4), 487-501. doi:10.1007/bf01384906
63.
SimsR. R.VeresJ. G.ShakeL. G. (1989). An exploratory examination of the convergence between the learning styles questionnaire and the learning style inventory II. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(1), 227-233. doi:10.1177/0013164489491025
64.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ. C. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. In Conference presented in the annual meeting of the psychometric society, Iowa City, IA.
65.
StiernborgM.ZaldivarS. B.SantiagoE. G. (1996). Effect of didactic teaching and experiential learning on nursing students' AIDS-related knowledge and attitudes. AIDS Care, 8(5), 601-608. doi:10.1080/09540129650125551
66.
TenopyrM. L. (1988). Artifactual reliability of forced-choice scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 749-751. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.749
67.
ThurstoneL. L. (1931). Rank order as a psycho-physical method. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14(3), 187-201. doi:10.1037/h0070025
68.
WillcoxonL.ProsserM. (1996). Kolb's learning style inventory (1985): Review and further study of validity and reliability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(2), 247-257. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01193.x
69.
WilsonD. K. (1986). An investigation of properties of Kolb’ s learning style inventory. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 7(3), 3-15. doi:10.1108/eb053597
70.
WyndW. R.BozmanC. S. (1996). Student learning style: A segmentation strategy for higher education. Journal of Education for Business, 71(4), 232-235. doi:10.1080/08832323.1996.10116790
71.
YahyaI. (1998). Willcoxson and Prosser's factor analyses on Kolb's (1985) LSI data: Reflections and re-analyses. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(2), 281-286. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01290.x
