Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Truancy can have a detrimental impact on student outcomes. Risk assessments are used to identify behavioral and emotional problems associated with school truancy. Although imperative for informing decisions about student’s welfare, risk assessments generally lack substantial validity evidence. Specifically, supporting score interpretation across cultural groups through measurement invariance (MI) is needed for such assessments. This study examined MI, specifically factor invariance (FI), of the Washington Assessment of the Risks and Needs of Students (WARNS) across African American, Latinx, and Caucasian students using confirmatory factor analysis with traditional FI criteria and the equivalence testing (ET) procedure. Results from traditional criteria suggested that the factor structure is similar across groups. The ET procedure demonstrated minor model misspecifications.

Keywords

risk assessments invariance ethnicity equivalence testing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Case

Haines

(2010). Risky business? The risk in risk factor research. Criminal Justice Matters, 80(1), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2010.482234

Chen

F. F.

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

French

B. F.

T. T.

(2019). Differential item functioning of a truancy assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282919863215

George

Coker

French

Strand

Gotch

McBride

McCurley

(2015). Washington Assessment of the Risks and Needs of Students (WARNS) user manual. Center for Court Research.

Hockenberry

Puzzanchera

(2018). Juvenile court statistics 2016. National Center for Juvenile Justice. https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/njcda/pdf/jcs2016.pdf

Iverson

French

B. F.

Strand

P. S.

Gotch

C. M.

McCurley

(2016). Understanding school truancy: Risk–need latent profiles of adolescents. Assessment, 25, 978–987. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116672329

Kane

M. T.

(2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000

Marcoulides

K. M.

Yuan

K.-H.

(2017). New ways to evaluate goodness of fit: A note on using equivalence testing to assess structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(1), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1225260

10.

McDonald

R. P.

(1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.

11.

Millsap

R. E.

(2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. Routledge.

12.

Olver

M. E.

Stockdale

K. C.

Wormith

J. S.

(2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(4), 329–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809331457

13.

Reise

S. P.

Bonifay

W. E.

Haviland

M. G.

(2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437

14.

Rodriguez

Reise

S. P.

Haviland

M. G.

(2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249

15.

Satorra

Bentler

P. M.

(2010). Ensuring postiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y

16.

Schwalbe

C. S.

(2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 31(5), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9071-7

17.

Strand

P. S.

Gotch

C. M.

French

B. F.

Beaver

J. L.

(2019). Factor structure and invariance of an adolescent risks and needs assessment. Assessment, 26, 1105–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117706021

18.

Yuan

K.-H.

Chan

(2016). Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-difference tests. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000080

Equivalence Testing of a Youth Risk and Needs Assessment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References