Meaning in life is a psychological construct linked to several subjective well-being indicators. One commonly used meaning in life measure is the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ), a 10-item self-report measure that assesses perceived presence of and search for meaning in life. Despite its extensive use, the variability of the questionnaire’s reliability across samples has not been examined. This study synthesized reliability evidence for the Meaning in Life Questionnaire from 232 articles. Average reliabilities for both subscales were greater than .85. Results indicated that, though, overall, the MLQ is highly reliable across samples, the questionnaire’s reliability varies as a function of several sample characteristics. Furthermore, we found some evidence of reporting bias. Implications for the conceptualization of meaning in life across diverse samples and potential underreporting of low reliability estimates are discussed.
AnscombeF. J.GlynnW. J. (1983). Distribution of kurtosis statistic for normal statistics. Biometrika, 70, 227-234.
2.
BattistaJ.AlmondR. (1973). The development of meaning in life. Psychiatry, 36, 409-427. doi:10.1521/00332747.1973.11023774
3.
BeretvasS. N.PastorD. A. (2003). Using mixed-effects models in reliability generalization studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 75-95. doi:10.1177/0013164402239318
4.
BonettD. G. (2002). Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 335-340.
5.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
6.
BoyrazG.LightseyO. R.CanA. (2013). The Turkish version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the measurement invariance across Turkish and American adult samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 423-431. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.765882.
7.
BrassaiL.PikoB. F.StegerM. F. (2012). Existential attitudes and Eastern European adolescents’ problem and health behaviors: Highlighting the role of the search for meaning in life. The Psychological Record, 62, 719-734.
8.
ChanW. C. H. (2014). Factor structure of the Chinese version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire among Hong Kong Chinese caregivers. Health & Social Work, 39, 135-143. doi:10.1093/hsw/hlu025
9.
ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S.LockeK. D.ZhangH.ShenJ.de Jesús Vargas-FloresJ.. . . MastorK. A. (2013). Need satisfaction and well-being: Testing self-determination theory in eight cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 507-534. doi:10.1177/0022022112466590
10.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
11.
CrumbaughJ. C.MaholickL. T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 200-207.
12.
DarK. A.IqbalN. (2017). Religious Commitment and Well-Being in College Students: Examining Conditional Indirect Effects of Meaning in Life. Journal of religion and health, 1-10.
13.
D’AgostinoR. B. (1970). Transformation to normality of the null distribution of G1. Biometrika, 57, 679-681.
14.
DimitrovD. M. (2002). Reliability: Arguments for multiple perspectives and potential problems with generalization across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 783-801. doi:10.1177/001316402236878
15.
DuvalS. J.TweedieR. L. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463.
16.
EggerM.Davey SmithG.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634.
17.
FranklV. E. (1965). The concept of man in logotherapy. Journal of Existentialism, 6(21), 53-58.
18.
E. H.Grotberg (Ed.). (2003). Resilience for today: Gaining strength from adversity. Westport, CT: Praeger.
19.
HakstianA. R.WhalenT. E. (1976). A k-sample significant test for independent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika, 41, 219-231.
20.
HensonR. K.ThompsonB. (2002). Characterizing measurement error in scores across studies: Some recommendations for conducting “reliability generalization” studies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 113-126.
21.
HessT. J.McNabA. L.BasogluK. A. (2014). Reliability generalization of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intentions. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 1-A29.
22.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539-1558.
23.
KaplanR. M.SaccuzzoD. P. (2012). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
24.
KiangL.FuligniA. J. (2010). Meaning in life as a mediator of ethnic identity and adjustment among adolescents from Latin, Asian, and European American backgrounds. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1253-1264.
25.
KingL. A.HeintzelmanS. J.WardS. J. (2016). Beyond the search for meaning: A contemporary science of the experience of meaning in life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 211-216. doi:10.1177/0963721416656354
26.
KingL. A.HicksJ. A.KrullJ. L.Del GaisoA. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179-196.
27.
KomstaL.NovometskyF. (2015). Moments: Moments, cumulants, skewness, kurtosis and related tests (R Package Version 0.14). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=moments
28.
López-LópezJ. A.BotellaJ.Sánchez-MecaJ.Marín-MartínezF. (2013). Alternatives for mixed-effects meta-regression models in the reliability generalization approach: A simulation study. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 443-469.
29.
LutharS. S.CicchettiD.BeckerB. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562.
30.
ParkC. L. (2005). Religion as a meaning-making framework in coping with life stress. Journal of social issues, 61(4), 707-729.
31.
PastorD. A.LazowskiR. A. (2018). On the multilevel nature of meta-analysis: A tutorial, comparison of software programs, and discussion of analytic choices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 24-89.
32.
RaudenbushS. W. (2009). Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 295-316). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Vienna, Austria. Available from https://www.R-project.org/
34.
RekerG. T. (2000). Theoretical perspective, dimensions, and measurement of existential meaning. In RekerG. T.ChamberlainK. (Eds.), Exploring existential meaning: Optimizing human development across the life span (pp. 39-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
RekerG. T.WongP. T. (1988). Aging as an individual process: Toward a theory of personal meaning. In BirrenJ. E.BengtsonV. L. (Eds.), Emergent theories of aging (pp. 214-246). New York, NY: Springer.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.
38.
SchulenbergS. E.StrackK. M.BuchananE. M. (2011). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Psychometric properties with individuals with serious mental illness in an inpatient setting. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 1210-1219. doi:10.1002/jclp.20841
39.
StegerM. F.BundickM. J.YeagerD. (2011). Meaning in life. In Roger J.R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Adolescence (pp. 1666-1677). New York, NY: Springer.
40.
StegerM. F.FrazierP.OishiS.KalerM. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80-93. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
41.
StegerM. F.KashdanT. B. (2007). Stability and specificity of meaning in life and life satisfaction over one year. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(2), 161-179.
42.
StegerM. F.KawabataY.ShimaiS.OtakeK. (2008). The meaningful life in Japan and the United States: Levels and correlates of meaning in life. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 660-678.
43.
ThompsonB. (2002). Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
ThompsonB.Vacha-HaaseT. (2000). Psychometrics is datametrics: The test is not reliable. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 174-195. doi:10.1177/0013164400602002
45.
TraubR. E.RowleyG. L. (1991). Understanding reliability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10, 37-45. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00183.x
46.
Vacha-HaaseT. (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 6-20. doi:10.1177/0013164498058001002
47.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48.
48.
WangS. Y.WongY. J.YehK. H. (2016). Relationship harmony, dialectical coping, and nonattachment: Chinese indigenous well-being and mental health. The Counseling Psychologist, 44, 78-108.
49.
WeeksA.SwerissenH.BelfrageJ. (2007). Issues, challenges, and solutions in translating study instruments. Evaluation Review, 31, 153-165.
50.
ZikaS.ChamberlainK. (1992). On the relation between meaning in life and psychological well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 133-145.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
