The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) is one of the most well-known tests in the field of adult intelligence assessment. This study explores the validity of the Egyptian adaptation for the subscales of the WAIS-IV. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that the first-order, second-order, and bifactor models of both the five-factor Cattel–Horn–Carroll (CHC) and the four-factor structures fitted with the WAIS-IV. When the Arithmetic subscale was pathed to Perceptual Reasoning and Working Memory, the modified four first-order factor showed a better fit than any other model. Estimates of internal consistency revealed that Cronbach’s alpha was very high (.91) for the WAIS-IV scale and for four-factor structures (ranging from .81 to .95), while was low (0.61) for the WAIS-IV scale and for four-factor structures, ranging from 0.20 to 0.68. Overall, these findings provided adding evidence about the dimensionality of WAIS-IV with a new sample.
BensonN.HulacD. M.KranzlerJ. H. (2010). Independent Examination of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): What does the WAIS-IV measure?Psychological Assessment, 22, 121-130. doi:10.1037/a0017767
2.
BowdenS. C.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (2011). Invariance of the measurement model underlying the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–IV in the United States and Canada. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 186-199. doi:10.1177/0013164410387382
3.
CanivezG. L.KushJ. C. (2013). WAIS-IV and WISC-IV structural validity alternate methods, alternate results. Commentary on Weiss et al. (2013a) and Weiss et al. (2013b). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 157-169. doi:10.1177/0734282913478036
4.
CanivezG. L.WatkinsM. W. (2010). Investigation of the factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): Exploratory and higher order factor analyses. Psychological Assessment, 22, 827-836. doi:10.1037/a0020429
5.
ClimieE. A.RostadK. (2011). Test review: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 581-586. doi:10.1177/0734282911408707
6.
CoalsonD. L.RaifordS. E.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (2010). WAIS-IV: Advances in the Assessment of Intelligence. In WeissL. G.CoalsonD. L.SaklofskeD. H.RaifordS. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 3-24). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
GignacG. E. (2008). Higher-order models versus direct hierarchical models: g as superordinate or breadth factor?Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(1), 21-43.
9.
GignacG. E.WatkinsM. W. (2013). Bifactor modeling and the estimation of model-based reliability in the WAIS-IV. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 639-662. doi:10.1080/00273171.2013.804398
10.
GlassL. A.RyanJ. J.CharterR. A. (2010). Discrepancy score reliabilities in the WAIS-IV standardization sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 201-208. doi:10.1177/0734282909346710
11.
GoldsteinG.SaklofskeD. H. (2010). The Wechsler Intelligence Scales in the Assessment of Psychopathology. In WeissL. G.CoalsonD. L.SaklofskeD. H.RaifordS. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 189-216). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
HarrisonA. G.HolmesA.SilvestriR.ArmstrongI. T. (2015a). Getting back to the main point: A reply to Miller et al. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 780-786. doi:10.1177/0734282915590064
13.
HarrisonA. G.HolmesA.SilvestriR.ArmstrongI. T. (2015b). Implications for educational classification and psychological diagnoses using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition with Canadian versus American norms. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 299-311. doi:10.1177/0734282915573723
14.
KaufmanA. S.SalthouseT. A.ScheiberC.ChenH. (2016). Age differences and educational attainment across the life span on three generations of Wechsler Adult Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(5), 421-441. https://doi:10.1177/0734282915619091
15.
McGrewK. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004
16.
MillerD. I.DavidsonP. S. R.SchindlerD.MessierC. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV in older adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 375-390. doi:10.1177/0734282912467961
17.
MillerJ. L.WeissL. G.BealA. L.SaklofskeD. H.ZhuJ.HoldnackJ. A. (2015). Intelligent use of intelligence tests empirical and clinical support for Canadian WAIS-IV norms. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 312-328. doi:10.1177/0734282915578577
18.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
19.
NelsonJ. M.CanivezG. L.WatkinsM. W. (2013). Structural and incremental validity of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition with a clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 25, 618-630. doi:10.1037/a0032086
20.
ReiseS. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
21.
ReynoldsM. R.IngramP. B.SeeleyJ. S.NewbyK. D. (2013). Investigating the structure and invariance of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales, Fourth Edition in a sample of adults with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 3235-3245. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.029
22.
SalthouseT. A.SaklofskeD. H. (2010). Do the WAIS-IV tests measure the same aspects of cognitive functioning in adults under and over 65? In WeissL. G.CoalsonD. L.SaklofskeD. H.RaifordS. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 217-235). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
van AkenL.van der HeijdenP. T.van der VeldW. M.HermansL.KesselsR. P. C.EggerJ. I. M. (2017). Representation of the cattell–horn–carroll theory of cognitive abilities in the factor structure of the dutch-language version of the WAIS-IV. Assessment, 24(4), 458-466. doi:10.1177/1073191115607973
24.
van de VijverF.TanzerN. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 54, 119-135. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004
25.
WardL. C.BergmanM. A.HebertK. R. (2012). WAIS-IV subtest covariance structure: Conceptual and statistical considerations. Psychological Assessment, 24, 328-340. doi:10.1037/a0025614
26.
WechslerD. (2008). WAIS-IV: Technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
27.
WeissL. G.KeithT. Z.ZhuJ.ChenH. (2013a). Technical and practical issues in the structure and clinical invariance of the Wechsler Scales: A rejoinder to commentaries. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 235-243. doi:10.1177/0734282913478050
28.
WeissL. G.KeithT. Z.ZhuJ.ChenH. (2013b). WAIS-IV and clinical validation of the four- and five-factor interpretative approaches. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 94-113. doi:10.1177/0734282913478030
29.
WeissL. G.SaklofskeD. H.CoalsonD. L.RaifordS. E. (2010). Theoretical, empirical and clinical foundations of the WAIS-IV index scores. In WeissL. G.CoalsonD. L.SaklofskeD. H.RaifordS. E. (Eds.), WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 64-94). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30.
ZinbargR. E.YovelI.RevelleW.McDonaldR. P. (2006). Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale’s indicators: A comparison of estimators for ωh. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 121-144. doi:10.1177/0146621605278814
