School climate is an important construct for guiding violence prevention efforts in U.S. schools, but there has been less consideration of this concept in its neighboring country Mexico, which has a higher prevalence of violence. The U.S. Department of Education outlined a three-domain conceptualization of school climate (i.e., safe and supportive schools model) that includes engagement, safety, and the school environment. To examine the applicability of this school climate model in Mexico, the present study tested its measurement invariance across middle school students in the United States (n = 15,099) and Mexico (n = 2,211). Findings supported full invariance for engagement and modified-safety scales indicating that factor loadings and intercepts contributed almost equally to factor means, and scale scores were comparable across groups. Partial invariance was found for the environment scales. Results of a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) consisting of all 13 school climate scales indicated significantly positive associations among all scales in the U.S. sample and among most scales in the Mexico sample. Implications of these findings are discussed.
BradshawC. P.MitchellM. M.LeafP. J. (2010). Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133-148.
3.
BradshawC. P.WaasdorpT. E.DebnamK. J.JohnsonS. L. (2014). Measuring school climate in high schools: A focus on safety, engagement, and the environment. Journal of School Health, 84, 593-604.
4.
ByrneB. M.van De VijverF. J. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107-132.
5.
CaudilloM. L.TorcheF. (2014). Exposure to local homicides and early educational achievement in Mexico. Sociology of Education, 87, 89-105.
6.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.
7.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
8.
CornellD.ShuklaK.KonoldT. (2015). Peer victimization and authoritative school climate: A multilevel approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1186-1201.
9.
CornellD.ShuklaK.KonoldT. R. (2016). Authoritative school climate and student academic engagement, grades, and aspirations in middle and high schools. AERA Open, 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416633184.
Dotson-BlakeK. (2010). Learning from each other: A portrait of family-school-community partnerships in the United States and Mexico. Professional School Counseling, 14, 101-114.
12.
FanX.ThompsonB.WangL. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83. doi:10.1080/10705519909540119
13.
ForlinC.CedilloI. G.Romero-ContrerasS.FletcherT.Rodriguez HernándezH. J. (2010). Inclusion in Mexico: Ensuring supportive attitudes by newly graduated teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14, 723-739.
14.
GillM. G.AshtonP.AlginaJ. (2004). Authoritative schools: A test of a model to resolve the school effectiveness debate. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 389-409.
15.
GregoryA.CornellD.FanX. (2011). The relationship of school structure and support to suspension rates for Black and White high school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 904-934.
16.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
17.
LoukasA.MurphyJ. L. (2007). Middle school student perceptions of school climate: Examining protective functions on subsequent adjustment problems. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 293-309.
18.
MeadeA. W.JohnsonE. C.BraddyP. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568-592.
MoriconiG.BélangerJ. (2015). Student behaviour and use of class time in Brazil, Chile and Mexico: Evidence from TALIS 2013. OECD Education Working Papers, 112. doi:10.1787/5js6bhlchwmt-en
21.
Murillo TorrecillaF. J.Hernández CastillaR. (2011). School factors associated with socio-emotional development in Latin American countries. RELIEVE, 17, 1-23. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v17n2/RELIEVEv17n2_2.htm
22.
MuthénL. K.MuthénL. (1998-2016). Mplus [computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
23.
National School Climate Council. (2007). The school climate challenge: Narrowing the gap between school climate research and school climate policy, practice guidelines and teacher education policy. Available from http://nscc.csee.net/
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP. É.SavaleiV. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354-373. doi:10.1037/a0029315
27.
SassD. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347-363.
28.
SassD. A.SchmittT. A.MarshH. W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 167-180.
29.
SegeritzM.PantH. A. (2013). Do they feel the same way about math? Testing measurement invariance of the PISA “students’ approaches to learning” instrument across immigrant groups within Germany. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 601-630.
30.
ShuklaK.KonoldT.CornellD. (2016). Profiles of student perceptions of school climate: Relations with risk behaviors and academic outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 57, 291-307.
31.
SteffgenG.RecchiaS.ViechtbauerW. (2013). The link between school climate and violence in school: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 300-309.
32.
ThapaA.CohenJ.GuffeyS.Higgins-D’AlessandroA. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83, 357-385.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). TERCE executive summary—Associated factors 2015. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/santiago/terce/
35.
WaasdorpT. E.BradshawC. P.LeafP. J. (2012). The impact of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on bullying and peer rejection: A randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166, 149-156.
36.
WangM. T.EcclesJ. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23.
37.
WayN.ReddyR.RhodesJ. (2007). Students’ perceptions of school climate during the middle school years: Associations with trajectories of psychological and behavioral adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 194-213.
38.
WeissC. C.GarcíaE. (2015). Student engagement and academic performance in Mexico: Evidence and puzzles from PISA. Comparative Education Review, 59, 305-331.
