The current study examined the psychometric validity and gender invariance of the Academic Buoyancy Scale in the Philippines through a construct validation approach. In terms of within-network construct validity, our results demonstrated that the unidimensional model of academic buoyancy significantly fit the current sample and was invariant across gender. Male students scored significantly higher than female students on academic buoyancy. Regarding between-network construct validity, our results revealed that academic buoyancy was positively associated with behavioral and emotional engagement. Implications of the findings of the study are discussed.
BernardoA. B. I. (2011). Lost in translation? Challenges in using psychological tests in the Philippines. Silliman Journal, 52, 19-42.
2.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
3.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
CollieR. J.MartinA. J.BottrellD.ArmstrongD.UngarM.LiebenbergL. (2016). Social support, academic adversity and academic buoyancy: A person-centred analysis and implications for academic outcomes. Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01443410.2015.1127330
5.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269-314). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
6.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU.NagengastB. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491.
7.
MartinA. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413-440.
8.
MartinA. J.ColmarS. H.DaveyL. A.MarshH. W. (2010). Longitudinal modelling of academic buoyancy and motivation: Do the 5Cs hold up over time?British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 473-496.
9.
MartinA. J.GinnsP.BrackettM. A.MalmbergL.-E.HallJ. (2013). Academic buoyancy and psychological risk: Exploring reciprocal relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 128-133.
10.
MartinA. J.MarshH. W. (2008a). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 53-83.
11.
MartinA. J.MarshH. W. (2008b). Workplace and academic buoyancy: Psychometric assessment and construct validity amongst school personnel and students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26, 168-184.
12.
MillerS.ConnollyP.MaguireL. K. (2013). Wellbeing, academic buoyancy and educational achievement in primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 239-248.
13.
SkinnerE. A.KindermannT. A.FurrerC. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493-525.
14.
SymesW.PutwainD. W.RemediosR. (2015). The enabling and protective role of academic buoyancy in the appraisal of fear appeals used prior to high stakes examinations. School Psychology International, 36, 605-619.
15.
YuK.MartinA. J. (2014). Personal best (PB) and “classic” achievement goals in the Chinese context: Their role in predicting academic motivation, engagement and buoyancy. Educational Psychology, 34, 635-658.
