We reviewed 13 studies that focused on analyzing student errors on achievement tests from the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Third edition (KTEA-3). The intent was to determine what instructional implications could be derived from in-depth error analysis. As we reviewed these studies, several themes emerged. We explain how a careful analysis of errors is key to planning the most appropriate instructional interventions.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 255-259.
3.
AvitiaM.DeBiaseE.PagirskyM.RootM. M.HowellM.PanX.… LiuX. (2017). Achievement error differences of students with reading versus math disorders. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 111-123
4.
AvitaM.PagirskyM.CourvilleT.DeBiaseE.KnuppT.Ottone-CrossK. (2017). Differences in errors between students with language and reading disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 149-154.
5.
BreauxK. C.AvitiaM.KoriakinT. A.BrayM. A.DeBiaseE.CourvilleT.… GrossmanS. (2017). Patterns of strengths and weaknesses (PSW) on the WISC-V, DAS-II, and KABC-II and their relationship to students’ errors in oral language, reading, writing, spelling, and math. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 168-185.
6.
BreauxK. C.BrayM. A.RootM. M.KaufmanA. S. (2017). Introduction to special issue and to KTEA-3 error analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 4-6.
7.
ChardD. J.DicksonS. V. (1999). Phonological awareness: Instructional and assessment guidelines. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 261-270.
8.
ChoiD.HatcherC.LangleyS. D.LiuX.BrayM. A.CourvilleT.. . . DeBiaseE. (2017). What do phonological processing errors tell about students’ skills in reading, writing, and oral language?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 24-46.
9.
CormierD. C.BulutO.McGrewK. S.FrisonJ. (2016). The role of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities in predicting writing achievement during the school-age years. Psychology in the Schools, 53, 787-803. doi:10.1002/pits.21945
10.
CormierD. C.McGrewK. S.BulutO.FunamotoA. (2016). Revisiting the relationships between broad Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and reading achievement during the school-age years. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. Prepublished July, 12, 2016,. doi:10.1177/0734282916659208
11.
CruickshankW. M. (1977). Least-restrictive placement: Administrative wishful thinking. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 193-194.
12.
EhriL. C. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In SnowlingM.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135-154). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
13.
EhriL. C. (2006). Alphabetics instruction helps students learn to read. In JoshiR. M.AaronP. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 649-677). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
FloydR. G.EvansJ. J.McGrewK. S. (2003). Relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement across the school-age years. Psychology in the Schools, 60, 155-171.
15.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2007). Mathematical problem solving: Instructional intervention. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 397-414). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
GearyD. C. (2007). An evolutionary perspective on learning disabilities in mathematics. Developmental Neuropsychology, 32, 471-519.
17.
HatcherC.BreauxK. C.LiuX.BrayM. A.Ottone-CrossK. L.CourvilleT.… LangleyS. D. (2017). Analysis of children’s errors in comprehension and expression. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 57-73.
18.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (2014). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement–Third edition (KTEA-3). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
19.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.BoardmanA.SwansonE. (2012). Now we get it! Boosting comprehension with collaborative strategic reading. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
KoriakinT. A.KaufmanA. S. (2017). Investigating patterns of errors for specific comprehension and fluency difficulties. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 138-148.
21.
KoriakinT. A.WhiteE.BreauxK. C.DeBiaseE.O’BrienR.HowellM.… CourvilleT. (2017). Patterns of cognitive strengths and weaknesses and relationships to math errors. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 155-167.
22.
KroesbergenE. H.Van LuitJ. E. H. (2003). Mathematical interventions for children with special educational needs. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97-114.
23.
LiuX.MarchisL.DeBiaseE.BreauxK. C.CourvilleT.PanX.… KaufmanA. S. (2017). Do cognitive patterns of strengths and weaknesses differentially predict the errors on reading, writing, and spelling?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 186-205.
24.
MonroeM. (1932). Children who cannot read. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
25.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
26.
OakhillJ.CainK. (2016). Supporting reading comprehension development: From research to practice. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 42(2), 32-39.
27.
O’BrienR.PanX.CourvilleT.BrayM. A.BreauxK. C.AvitiaM.ChoiD. (2017). Exploratory factor analysis of reading, spelling, and math errors. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2) 7-23.
28.
Ottone-CrossK. L.LangleyS. D.RootM. M.GelbarN.BrayM. A.LuriaS. R.… PanX. (2017). Beyond the mask: Analysis of error patterns on the KTEA-3 for students with giftedness and learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 74-93.
29.
PagirskyM.KoriakinT. A.AvitiaM.CostaM.MarchisL.MaykelC.… PanX. (2017). Do the kinds of achievement errors made by students diagnosed with ADHD vary as a function of their reading ability?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 124-137.
30.
PenningtonB. F.PetersonR. L.McGrathL. M. (2009). Dyslexia. In PenningtonB. F. (Ed.), Diagnosing learning disorders (2nd ed., pp. 45-82). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
PerfettiC. A.LandiN.OakhillJ. (2007). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In SnowlingM. J.HulmeC. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-247). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
32.
PikulskiJ. J.ChardD. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. Reading Teacher, 58, 510-519.
33.
PodhajskiB. (2016). Teaching listening comprehension. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 42(3), 43-48.
34.
RootM. M.MarchisL.WhiteE.CourvilleT.ChoiD.BrayM. A.… WayteJ. (2017). How achievement error patterns of students with mild intellectual disability differ from low IQ and low achievement students without diagnoses. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 94-110.
SpencerM.QuinnJ. M.WagnerR. K. (2014). Specific reading comprehension disability: Major problem, myth, or misnomer?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 3-9.
38.
StewartC.RootM. M.KoriakinT.ChoiD.LuriaS. R.BrayM. A.… CourvilleT. (2017). Biological gender differences in students’ errors on mathematics achievement tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(1-2), 47-56.
39.
TomlinsonC. A. (2006). An educator’s guide to differentiating instruction. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
40.
XinY. P.JitendraA. K. (2006). Teaching problem solving skills to middle school students with learning difficulties: Schema-based strategy instruction. In MontagueM.JitendraA. (Eds.), Middle school students with mathematics difficulties (pp. 51-71). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
