Restricted accessBook reviewFirst published online 2017-12
Book Review: Psychological and psychoeducational assessment of deaf and hard of hearing children and adolescents,by M. S. Miller,T. N. Thomas-Presswood,K. Metz,& J. Lukomski
FlanaganD. P.AlfonsoV. C.MascoloJ. T. (2011). A CHC-based operational definition of SLD: Integrating multiple data sources and multiple data gathering methods. In FlanaganD. P.AlfonsoV. C. (Eds.), Essentials of specific learning disability identification (pp. 233-298). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2.
FlanaganD. P.OrtizS. O.AlfonsoV. C. (2013). Essentials of Cross-Battery Assessment (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
3.
HunsleyJ.LeeC. M.WoodJ. M.TaylorW. (2015). Controversial and questionable assessment techniques. In LilienfeldS. O.LynnS. J.LohrJ. M. (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology (2nd ed., pp. 42-82). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
KaneM. T. (2006). Validation. In BrennanR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17-64). Westport, CT: Praeger.
5.
Kovaleski.J. F.VanDerHeydenA. M.ShapiroE. S. (2013). The RTI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
7.
MillerD. N.NickersonA. B. (2006). Projective assessment and school psychology: Contemporary validity issues and implications for practice. The California School Psychologist, 11, 73-84.
8.
SchneiderW. J.McGrewK. S. (2012). The Cattell–Horn–Carroll model of intelligence. In FlanaganD. P.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 99-144). New York, NY: Guilford Press.