The underlying structure of the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System, Teacher Rating Scale–Preschool was investigated with a replication sample. Ratings from more than 3,000 students were used and four alternative models were investigated. As with prior research, a bifactor model with four factors was identified. The results supported an (Emerging) School Problems factor and yielded similar patterns of relationships with specific and general factors identified with prior research.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
ColemanM. R.BuysseV.NeitzelJ. (2006). Recognition and response: An early intervening system for young children at-risk for learning disabilities. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute. Available from http://www.recognitionandresponse.org
3.
DeverB. V.MaysK. L.KamphausR. W. (2012). The factor structure of the BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Teacher Form, Child/Adolescent. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 488-495.
4.
DiStefanoC. (in press). Examining fit with structural equation models. In SchweitzerK.DiStefanoC. (Eds.), Test construction: Standards and recent advancements. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
5.
DiStefanoC.GreerF. W.KamphausR. W. (2013). Multifactor modeling of emotional and behavioral risk of preschool-age children. Psychological Assessment, 25, 467-476. doi:10.1037/a0031393
6.
DowdyE.ChinJ. K.QuirkM. P. (2013). Preschool screening: An examination of the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Preschool Teacher Form (BESS Preschool). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,31, 578-584. doi:10.1177/0734282913475779
7.
DowdyE.ChinJ. K.TwyfordJ. M.DeverB. V. (2011). A factor analytic investigation of the BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Parent Form: Psychometric properties, practical implications, and future directions. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 265-280. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.005
8.
EneM.LeightonE.DiStefanoC. (2014, May). Investigating invariance of the BESS Teacher Rating Scale, Preschool version. Paper presented at the annual Modern Modeling Methods conference, Storrs, CT.
9.
GloverT.AlbersC. (2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 117-135. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.005
10.
GreerF. W.DiStefanoC. A.LiuJ.CainL. K. (2015). Preliminary psychometric evidence of the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Teacher Rating Scale–Preschool. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40, 240-246.
11.
GreerF. W.WilsonB. S.DiStefanoC.LiuJ. (2012). The social validity of universal screening. School Psychology Forum, 6(4), 148-159.
12.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
13.
KamphausR. W.ReynoldsC. R. (2007). The Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
14.
MuthénL.MuthénB. O. (1998-2004). Mplus software. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
15.
WiesnerM.SchandingG. T. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling, bifactor models, and standard confirmatory factor analysis models: Application to the BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Teacher Form. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 751-763.
