This longitudinal study of 78 Canadian English-speaking students examined the applicability of the stability, cumulative, and compensatory models in reading comprehension development. Archival government-mandated assessments of reading comprehension at Grades 3, 6, and 10, and the Canadian Test of Basic Skills measure of reading comprehension administered at Grade 10 were used. The probabilities of later-grade reading achievement based on earlier-grade reading achievement were computed, and tests of regression to the mean were conducted. Most changes in relative achievement were attributed to regression toward the mean. Overall, results suggest considerable stability across time.
AarnoutseC.van LeeuweJ.VoetenM.OudH. (2001). Development of decoding, reading comprehension, vocabulary and spelling during the elementary school years. Reading and Writing, 14, 61-89.
2.
AndersonR. C.WilsonP. T.FieldingL. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285-303.
3.
AunolaK.LeskinenE.Onatsu-ArvilommiT.NurmiJ. E. (2002). Three methods for studying developmental change: A case of reading skills and self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 343-360.
4.
BadianN. A. (1999). Reading disability defined as a discrepancy between listening and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study of stability, gender differences, and prevalence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 138-148.
5.
BastJ.ReitsmaP. (1998). Analyzing the development of individual differences in terms of Matthew effects in reading: Results from a Dutch longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1373-1399.
6.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
7.
CarrekerS. H.NeuhausG. F.SwankP. R.JohnsonP.MonfilsM. J.MontemayorM. L. (2007). Teachers with linguistically informed knowledge of reading subskills are associated with a Matthew effect in reading comprehension for monolingual and bilingual students. Reading Psychology, 28, 187-212.
8.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
9.
CunninghamA. E.StanovichK. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934-945.
10.
CuttingL. E.ScarboroughH. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277-299.
11.
DanemanM. (1996). Individual differences in reading skills. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 512-538). New York, NY: Longman.
12.
Education Quality and Accountability Office. (2000). Ontario provincial report on achievement 1999-2000. Retrieved from http://www.eqao.com/pdf_e/00/00P065e.pdf
13.
Education Quality and Accountability Office. (2003). The grade 3 and grade 6 assessments of reading, writing and mathematics, 2003-2004: Report of provincial results. Retrieved from http://www.eqao.com/pdf_e/03/03P031e.pdf
14.
Education Quality and Accountability Office. (2007). Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test 2007: Released selections and test questions. Retrieved from http://www.eqao.com/pdf_E/07/07P020E.pdf
15.
FrancisD. J.ShaywitzS. E.StuebingK. K.ShaywitzB. A.FletcherJ. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
16.
FuchsD.FuchsL. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
17.
FurbyL. (1973). Interpreting regression toward the mean in developmental research. Developmental Psychology, 8, 172-179.
18.
GhelaniK.SidhuR.JainU.TannockR. (2004). Reading comprehension and reading related abilities in adolescents with reading disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Dyslexia, 10, 364-384.
19.
KirbyJ. R.BallA.GeierB. K.ParrilaR.Wade-WoolleyL. (2011). The development of reading interest and its relation to reading ability. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 263-280.
20.
KirbyJ. R.DesrochersA.RothL.LaiS. S. Y. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology, 49, 103-110.
21.
KirbyJ. R.SavageR. S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading?Literacy, 42, 75-82.
22.
Kwiatkowska-WhiteB. (2012). Understanding reading comprehension performance in high school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
LeppänenU.NiemiP.AunolaK.NurmiJ. (2004). Development of reading skills among preschool and primary school pupils. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 72-93.
25.
LordF. M. (1958). Further problems in the measurement of growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 18, 437-451.
26.
McCallM. S.HauserC.CroninJ.KingsburyG. G.HouserR. (2006). Achievement gaps: An examination of differences in student achievement and growth. Lake Oswego, OR: Northwest Evaluation Association.
27.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
28.
Nelson Education. (1998). Canadian Test of Basic Skills. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Author.
29.
ParrilaR.AunolaK.LeskinenE.NurmiJ.KirbyJ. R. (2005). Development of individual differences in reading: Results from longitudinal studies in English and Finnish. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 299-319.
30.
ParrilaR.GeorgiouG.CorkettJ. (2007). University students with a significant history of reading difficulties: What is and is not compensated?Exceptionality Education Canada, 17, 195-220.
31.
PfostM.HattieJ.DörflerT.ArteltC. (2014). Individual differences in reading development: A review of 25 years of empirical research on Matthew Effects in reading. Review of Educational Research, 84, 203-244. doi:10.3102/0034654313509492
32.
PhillipsL. M.NorrisS. P.OsmondW. C.MaynardA. M. (2002). Relative reading achievement: A longitudinal study of 187 children from first through sixth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 3-13.
33.
ProtopapasA.ParrilaR.SimosP. G. (2014). In search of Matthew effects in reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022219414559974
34.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Arlington, VA: Author.
35.
RobertsG.TorgesenJ. K.BoardmanA.ScammaccaN. (2008). Evidence-based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 63-69.
36.
RuppA.LesauxN. K. (2006). Meeting expectations? An empirical investigation of a standards-based assessment of reading comprehension. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 315-333.
37.
ScarboroughH. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115-136.
38.
ShaywitzB. A.HolfordT. R.HolahanJ. M.FletcherJ. M.StuebingK. K.FrancisD. J.ShaywitzS. E. (1995). A Matthew effect for IQ but not for reading: Results from a longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 894-906.
39.
ShaywitzS. E.MorrisR.ShaywitzB. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 451-475.
40.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
41.
WixsonK. K.CarlisleJ. F. (2005). The influence of large-scale assessment of reading comprehension on classroom practice: A commentary. In ParisS. G.StahlS. A. (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 395-405). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
