This study tested whether trait emotional intelligence (TEI) measures of narrow bandwidth predict perception of facial emotion, using two tasks: identification of microexpressions of emotion and controlled visual search for target emotions. A total of 129 undergraduates completed multiple scales for TEI, as well as cognitive ability, personality, and stress measures. TEI was associated with a reduced stress response, but failed to predict performance on either task, contrary to the initial hypothesis. However, performance related significantly to higher cognitive intelligence, subjective task engagement, and use of task-focused coping. Individual differences in attentional resources may support processing of both emotive and non-emotive stimuli.
AustinE. J. (2004). An investigation of the relationship between trait emotional intelligence and emotional task performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1855-1864.
2.
AustinE. J. (2005). Emotional intelligence and emotional information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 403-414.
3.
BagbyR. M.TaylorG. J.ParkerJ. D. A. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto alexithymia scale II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 33-40.
4.
BakerA.ten BrinkeL.PorterS. (2012). Will get fooled again: Emotionally intelligent people are easily duped by high-stakes deceivers. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 300-313.
5.
CoffeyE.BerenbaumH.KernsJ. (2003). The dimensions of emotional intelligence, alexithymia, and mood awareness: Associations with personality and performance on an emotional Stroop task. Cognition & Emotion, 17, 671-679.
6.
DeBuskK.AustinE. J. (2011). Emotional intelligence and social perception. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 764-768.
7.
EdgarC.McRorieM.SneddonI. (2012). Emotional intelligence, personality and decoding non-verbal expressions of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 295-300.
8.
EkmanP. (2003). METT. Micro Expression Training Tool [CD-Rom].
9.
EkmanP. (2007). Emotions revealed. Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York, NY: Owl Books.
10.
FallonC. K.PanganibanA. R.WohleberR.MatthewsG.KustubayevaA. M.RobertsR. D. (2014). Emotional intelligence, cognitive ability and information search in tactical decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 24-29.
11.
FarrellyD.AustinE. J. (2007). Ability EI as an intelligence? Associations of the MSCEIT with performance on emotion processing and social tasks and with cognitive ability. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 1043-1063.
12.
FellnerA. N.MatthewsG.ShockleyK. D.WarmJ. S.ZeidnerM.KarlovL.RobertsR. D. (2012). Using emotional cues in a discrimination learning task: Effects of trait emotional intelligence and affective state. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 239-247.
13.
FioriM. (2009). A new look at emotional intelligence: A dual-process framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 21-44.
14.
FioriM.AntonakisJ. (2012). Selective attention to emotional stimuli: What IQ and openness do, and emotional intelligence does not. Intelligence, 40, 245-254.
15.
FiskA. D.SchneiderW. (1983). Category and word search: Generalizing search principles to complex processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 177-195.
16.
GrynbergD.ChangB.CorneilleO.MaurageP.VermeulenN.BerthozS.LuminetO. (2012). Alexithymia and the processing of emotional facial expressions (EFEs): Systematic review, unanswered questions and further perspectives. PLoS ONE, 7, 1-20.
17.
HallJ. A.AndrzejewskiS. A.YopchickJ. E. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of interpersonal sensitivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 149-180.
18.
HornJ. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 32, 179-185.
19.
KnyazevG. G.MitrofanovaL. G.BocharovA. V. (2013). Emotional intelligence and oscillatory responses to emotional facial expressions. Human Physiology, 39, 371-377.
20.
MatsumotoD.HwangH. S. (2011). Evidence for training the ability to read microexpressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 181-191.
21.
MatthewsG.CampbellS. E. (1998). Task-induced stress and individual differences in coping. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 42, 821-825.
22.
MatthewsG.CampbellS. E.FalconerS.JoynerL.HugginsJ.GillilandK.. . .WarmJ. S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion, 2, 315-340.
23.
MatthewsG.DaviesD. R.WestermanS. J.StammersR. B. (2000). Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
24.
MatthewsG.SzalmaJ.PanganibanA. R.NeubauerC.WarmJ. S. (2013). Profiling task stress with the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire. In CavalcantiL.AzevedoS. (Eds.), Psychology of stress: New research (pp. 49-90). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science.
25.
MatthewsG.WarmJ. S.ReinermanL. E.LangheimL. K.SaxbyD. J. (2010). Task engagement, attention and executive control. In GruszkaA.MatthewsG.SzymuraB. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 205-230). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
MatthewsG.WarmJ. S.ReinermanL. E.LangheimL. K.WashburnD. A.TrippL. (2010). Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 187-203.
27.
MatthewsG.WarmJ. S.ShawT. H.FinomoreV. S. (2014). Predicting battlefield vigilance: A multivariate approach to assessment of attentional resources. Ergonomics, 57, 856-875.
28.
MatthewsG.ZeidnerM. (2012). Individual differences in attentional networks: Trait and state correlates of the ANT. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 574-579.
29.
MatthewsG.ZeidnerM.RobertsR. D. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Science and myth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
MikolajczakM.RoyE.LuminetO.FilléeC.de TimaryP. (2007). The moderating impact of emotional intelligence on free cortisol responses to stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32, 1000-1012.
31.
O’SullivanM. (2007). Trolling for trout, trawling for tuna: The methodological morass in measuring emotional intelligence. In MatthewsG.ZeidnerM.RobertsR. D. (Eds.), The science of emotional intelligence: Knowns and unknowns (pp. 258-287). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
Pérez-GonzálezJ. C.PetridesK. V.FurnhamA. (2005). Measuring trait emotional intelligence. In RobertsR. D.SchulzeR. (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: An international handbook (pp. 181-201). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
33.
Pérez-GonzálezJ. C.Sanchez-RuizM.-J. (2014). Trait emotional intelligence anchored within the Big Five, Big Two and Big One frameworks. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 53-58.
34.
PetridesK. V.FurnhamA. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence: Behavioural validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39-57.
35.
RobertsR. D.SchulzeR.O’BrienK.MacCannC.ReidJ.MaulA. (2006). Exploring the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) with established emotions measures. Emotion, 6, 663-669.
36.
SalgueroJ. M.ExtremeraN.Fernández-BerrocalP. (2013). A meta-mood model of rumination and depression: Preliminary test in a non-clinical population. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 166-172.
37.
SaloveyP.MayerJ. D.GoldmanS.TurveyC.PalfaiT. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In PennebakerJ. W. (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 125-154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38.
SaloveyP.StroudL. R.WooleryA.EpelE. S. (2002). Perceived emotional intelligence, stress reactivity, and symptom reports: Further explorations using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Psychology & Health, 17, 611-627.
39.
SaucierG. (2003). Orthogonal markers for orthogonal factors: The case of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 1-31.
40.
SchlegelK.GrandjeanD.SchererK. S. (2012). Emotion recognition: Unidimensional ability or a set of modality- and emotion-specific skills?Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 16-21.
41.
SchweizerK. (2010). The relationship of attention and intelligence. In GruszkaA.MatthewsG.SzymuraB. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 247-262). New York, NY: Springer.
42.
ShawT. H.MatthewsG.WarmJ. S.FinomoreV.SilvermanL.CostaP. T.Jr. (2010). Individual differences in vigilance: Personality, ability and states of stress. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 297-308.
43.
SheldonO. J.DunningD.AmesD. R. (2014). Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested in learning more: Reactions to feedback about deficits in emotional intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 125-137.
44.
StankovL. (2000). Gf/Gc Test Battery. Sydney, Australia: School of Psychology, University of Sydney.
45.
SwinkelsA.GiulianoT. A. (1995). The measurement and conceptualization of mood awareness: Monitoring and labeling one’s mood states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 934-949.
46.
TolegenovaA. A.KustubayevaA. M.MatthewsG. (2014).Trait meta-mood, gender and EEG response during emotion-regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 75-80.
47.
WojciechowskiJ.StolarskiM.MatthewsG. (2014). Emotional intelligence and mismatching expressive and verbal messages: A contribution to detection of deception. PLoS ONE, 9, e92570.
48.
WongC. S.LawK. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 243-274.
49.
ZeidnerM.HadarD.MatthewsG.RobertsR. D. (2013). Personal factors related to compassion fatigue in health professionals. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 26, 595-609.
50.
ZeidnerM.MatthewsG.RobertsR. D. (2012). The emotional intelligence, health, and well-being nexus: What have we learned and what have we missed?Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 4, 1-30.
51.
ZeidnerM.Shani-ZinovichI.MatthewsG.RobertsR. D. (2005). Assessing emotional intelligence in gifted and non-gifted high school students: Outcomes depend on the measure. Intelligence, 33, 369-391.
