This study explored motivation and engagement among North American (the United States and Canada; n = 1,540), U.K. (n = 1,558), Australian (n = 2,283), and Chinese (n = 3,753) secondary school students. Motivation and engagement were assessed via students’ responses to the Motivation and Engagement Scale–High School (MES–HS). Confirmatory factor analysis using Mplus found good fit for each of the four samples. Multi-group invariance tests demonstrated comparable factor structure, reliability, distributional properties, and correlations with a set of validational factors across the four groups. Results hold implications for international assessment of motivation and engagement, research, and data analysis.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504.
2.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
3.
ElliottJ. G.BempechatJ. (2002). The culture and contexts of achievement motivation. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2002(96), 7-26.
4.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). Student engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
5.
HauK.-T.HoI. T. (2008). Editorial: Insights from research on Asian students’ achievement motivation. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 865-869.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
8.
LeungD. Y. P.GinnsP.KemberD. (2008). Examining the cultural specificity of approaches to learning in universities in Hong Kong and Sydney. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 251-266.
9.
LiemG. A.MartinA. J. (2012). The Motivation and Engagement Scale: Theoretical framework, psychometric properties, and applied yields. Australian Psychologist, 47, 3-13.
10.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.ArteltC.BaumertJ.PescharJ. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6, 311-360.
11.
MartinA. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413-440.
12.
MartinA. J. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic life span: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high school, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794-824.
13.
MartinA. J. (2010). The Motivation and Engagement Scale. Sydney, Australia: Lifelong Achievement Group. Available from www.lifelongachievement.com
14.
MartinA. J.HauK.-T. (2010). Achievement motivation amongst Chinese and Australian school students: Assessing differences of kind and differences of degree. International Journal of Testing, 10, 274-294.
15.
MartinA. J.MarshH. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 53-83.
16.
MartinA. J.MarshH. W. (2009). Academic resilience and academic buoyancy: Multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of causes, correlates, and cognate constructs. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 353-370.
17.
MartinA. J.YuK.HauK.-T. (2013). Motivation and engagement in the “Asian century”: A comparison of Chinese students in Australia, Hong Kong, and Mainland China. Educational Psychology, 34, 417-439.
18.
McDonaldR. P.MarshH. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255.
MurphyP. K.AlexanderP. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3-53.
21.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2008). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
22.
NagabhushanP. (2012). Academic motivation and engagement: An examination of its factor structure in senior school years. The European Journal of Behavioural and Social Sciences, 2, 260-277.
23.
PintrichP. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
24.
PlentyS.HeubeckB. G. (2011). Mathematics motivation and engagement: An independent evaluation of a complex model with Australian rural high school students. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 17, 283-299.
25.
PlentyS.HeubeckB. G. (2013). A multidimensional analysis of changes in mathematics motivation and engagement during high school. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 33, 14-30.
26.
SegallM. H.LonnerW. J.BerryJ. W. (1998). Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline. American Psychologist, 53, 1101-1110.
27.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
