Technical adequacy and usability are important considerations in selecting early childhood social-emotional (SE) screening and assessment measures. As identification of difficulties can be tied to programming, intervention, accountability, and funding, it is imperative that practitioners and decision makers select appropriate and quality measures from the plethora of measures available. This study systematically reviewed and evaluated the technical adequacy and usability of 10 commonly used SE assessment and screening measures, using a framework for evaluating selected properties of measures (e.g., reliability, validity). Through this review, it was found that there are inadequacies in many commonly used SE measures, deserving the attention of both users and developers.
AaronsonN.AlonsoJ.BurnamA.LohrK. N.PatrickD. L.PerrinE.SteinR. E. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193-205. doi:org/10.1023/A:1015291021312
2.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Child behavior checklist for ages 1½ to 5: Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington: Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, University of Vermont.
3.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2001). Developmental surveillance and screening of infants and young children. Pediatrics, 108, 192-196. doi:org/10.1542/peds.108.1.192
4.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
5.
BrackenB. A.KeithL. K.WalkerK. C. (1998). Assessment of preschool behavior and social-emotional functioning: A review of thirteen third-party instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16, 153-169. doi:org/10.1177/073428299801600204
6.
BrickerD.DavisM. S.SquiresJ. (2004). Mental health screening in young children. Infants & Young Children, 17, 129-144. doi:org/10.1097/00001163-200404000-00005
7.
Briggs-GowanM. J.CarterA. S. (2006). Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
8.
BruininksR. H.WoodcockR. W.WeathermanR. F.HillB. K. (1996). Scales of Independent Behavior–Revised (SIB-R). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
9.
CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research. (2004). Outcome measures rating form guidelines. Hamilton, CA: McMaster University.
10.
CarterA. S.Briggs-GowanM. J. (2006). Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (ITSEA). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
11.
CarterA. S.Briggs-GowanM. J.DavisN. O. (2004). Assessment of young children’s social-emotional development and psychopathology: recent advances and recommendations for practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 109-134.
12.
CaselmanT. D.SelfP. A. (2008). Assessment instruments for measuring young children’s social-emotional behavioral development. Children & Schools, 30, 103-115.
13.
EmmonsM. R.AlfonsoV. C. (2005). A critical review of the technical characteristics of current preschool screening batteries. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 111-127. doi:10.1177/073428290502300201
14.
FallonA.WestawayJ.MoloneyC. (2008). A systematic review of psychometric evidence and expert opinion regarding the assessment of faecal incontinence in older community-dwelling adults. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 6, 225-259. doi:10.1111/j.1479-6988.2007.00088.x
15.
GokiertR. J.GeorgisR.ChowW.ChuiY. (2012). Early childhood developmental screening: Does culture play a role?Health Research Transfer in Alberta: Knowledge Translation Casebook, 3, 22-25.
16.
GreenspanS. I. (2004). Greenspan Social-Emotional Growth Chart: A Screening Questionnaire for Infants and Young Children. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
17.
GreenspanS. I.MeiselsS. J. (1996). Toward a new vision for the developmental assessment of infants and young children. In MeiselsS. J.FenichelE. (Eds.), New visions for the developmental assessment of infants and young children (pp. 11-26). Washington, DC: ZERO TO THREE.
18.
HarrisonP. L.OaklandT. (2003). Adaptive behavior assessment system (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
19.
HendersonJ.StrainP. (2009). Screening for social emotional concerns: Considerations in the selection of instruments (Roadmap to Effective Intervention Practices). Tampa: Technical Assistance Center on Social Emotional Intervention for Young Children, University of South Florida.
20.
HumphreyN.KalamboukaA.WigelsworthM.LendrumA.DeightonJ.WolpertM. (2011). Measures of social and emotional skills for children and young people: A systematic review. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 617-637. doi:org/10.1177/0013164410382896
21.
KeszeiA. P.NovakM.StreinerD. L. (2010). Introduction to health measurement scales. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68, 319-323. doi:org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.006
22.
McCainM. N.MustardF.ShankerS. (2007). Early years study 2: Putting science into action. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Council for Early Childhood Development.
23.
MeiselsS. J.Atkins-BurnettS. (2000). The elements of early childhood assessment. In ShonkoffJ. P.MeilselsS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed., pp. 231-257). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24.
RaverC. C.ZiglerE. F. (1997). Social competence: An untapped dimension in evaluating head start’s success. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 363-385.
25.
RenemanM. F.DijkstraA.GeertzenJ. H. B.DijkstraP. U. (2010). Psychometric properties of chronic pain acceptance questionnaires: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 14, 457-465. doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.08.003
26.
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (2004). Behaviour Assessment System for Children—Second edition (BASC-2). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
27.
SandallS.HemmeterM. L.SmithB. J.McLeanM. E. (Eds.). (2005). DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education. Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood.
28.
ShonkoffJ.PhillipsD. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29.
SosnaT.MastergeorgeA. (2005). Compendium of screening tools for early childhood social-emotional development. Sacramento: California Institute for Mental Health.
30.
SparrowS. S.BallaD. A.CicchettiD. V. (1998). Vineland Social-Emotional Early Childhood Scales (Vineland SEEC). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
31.
SparrowS. S.CicchettiD. V.BallaD. A. (2005). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Survey forms manual (Survey Interview Form and Parent/Caregiver Rating Form, 2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
32.
SparrowS. S.CicchettiD. V.BallaD. A. (2006). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Teacher rating form manual (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
33.
SquiresJ. (2003, January). The importance of early identification of social and emotional difficulties in preschool children (Prepared for the Center for International Rehabilitation). Early Intervention Program, Center on Human Development, University of Oregon, Eugene.
34.
SquiresJ.BrickerD.TwomblyE. (2002). Ages And Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE). A parent-completed, child-monitoring system for social-emotional behaviors. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
35.
SveinbjornsdottirS.ThorsteinssonE. B. (2008). Adolescent coping scales: A critical psychometric review. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 533-548. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00669.x
36.
TysonS. F.ConnellL. A. (2009). How to measure balance in clinical practice: A systematic review of the psychometrics and clinical utility of measures of balance activity for neurological conditions. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23, 824-840. doi:org/10.1177/0269215509335018
