The Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability Third Edition is developed using the Cattell–Horn–Carroll (CHC) measurement-theory test design as the instrument’s theoretical blueprint. The instrument provides users with cognitive scores based on the Cognitive Performance Model (CPM); however, the CPM is not a part of CHC theory. Within the instrument’s Technical Manual the authors provide some information about the CPM; however, the structural/theoretical support for the validity of the CPM is limited. Recent research found empirical support for the CPM as intermediate factors within Carroll’s three-stratum theory of intelligence. The results from the present study also provide empirical support of the CPM as intermediate factors lying between the second- and third-strata of a CHC-based theoretical model. In addition, a previously unidentified research-based two-factor CPM is identified as the best-fitting model among several competing CPM.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4.
CarrollJ. B. (1997). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In FlanaganD. P.GenshaftJ. L.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 122-130). New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
CizekG. J. (2003). Review of the Woodcock-Johnson III. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C.SpiesR. A. (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1020-1024). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
6.
ConwayC.PisoniD.KronenbergerW. (2009). The importance of sound for cognitive sequencing abilities: The auditory scaffolding hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 275-279. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01651
7.
ElliottC. D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
8.
FanX.SivoS. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 509-529.
9.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286
10.
HornJ. L. (1965). Fluid and crystallized intelligence: A factor analytic and developmental study of the structure among primary mental abilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana.
11.
HornJ. L. (1994). The theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of intelligence (pp. 443-451). New York, NY: Macmillan.
12.
JergerJ.MusiekF. (2002). On the diagnosis of auditory processing disorder: A reply to Clinical and research concerns regarding Jerger & Musiek (2000) APD recommendations. Audiology Today, 14(2), 19-21.
13.
KeithT. Z. (1997). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In FlanaganD. P.GenshaftJ. L.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 373-402). New York, NY: Guilford.
14.
KeithT. Z. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In FlanaganD. P.GenshaftJ. L.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 581-614). New York, NY: Guilford.
15.
KeithT. Z.ReynoldsM. R. (2010). Cattell-horn-carroll abilities and cognitive tests: What we’ve learned from 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 635-650.
16.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
17.
McGrewK. S. (2005). The cattell-horn-carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present and future. In FlanaganD. P.GenshaftJ. L.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 136-182). New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
McGrewK. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004
19.
McGrewK. S.WoodcockR. W. (2001). Technical manual. Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
20.
MeadeA. W.JohnsonE. C.BraddyP. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568-592.
21.
MilesJ.ShevlinM. (2007). A time and place for incremental fit indices. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 869-874.
22.
NaglieriJ. A.DasJ. P. (1997). Cognitive assessment system. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
23.
SandovalJ. (2003). Review of the Woodcock-Johnson III. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C.SpiesR. A. (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1024-1028). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
24.
SchaferJ. L.GrahamJ. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
25.
SchneiderW. J.McGrewK. S. (2012). The cattell-horn-carroll model of intelligence. In FlanaganD.HarrisonP. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 99-144). New York, NY: Guilford.
26.
StankovL. (2000). The theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence—New findings and recent developments. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 1-3. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(00)00039-X
27.
TaubG. E.McGrewK. S. (2004). A confirmatory factor analysis of CHC theory and cross-age invariance of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of cognitive abilities III. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 72-87. doi:10.1521/scpq.19.1.72.29409
WoodcockR. W. (1997). The Woodcock-Johnson Tests of cognitive ability—Revised. In FlanaganD. P.GenshaftJ. L.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 373-402). New York, NY: Guilford.
30.
WoodcockR. W.JohnsonM. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery—Revised. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
31.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca,IL. Riverside.
32.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN.SchrankF. A. (2003). Woodcock-Johnson III diagnostic supplement to the tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
