The fourth edition of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) is a revised and substantially updated version of its predecessor. The purposes of this research were to determine the constructs measured by the test and the consistency of measurement across large normative and clinical samples. Competing higher order WAIS-IV four- and five-factor models were analyzed using the WAIS-IV’s sample of 1,800 normative adults and 411 clinical adults. When all 15 WAIS-IV subtests were considered, both four- and five-factor models were suitable, but the five-factor model provided a better fit. The WAIS-IV PRI differentiated into two composites as follows: POI(Gv) consisting of Block Design, Visual Puzzles and Picture Completion; and FRI(Gf) consisting Matrix Reasoning, Arithmetic and Figure Weights. The five-factor solution included Quantitative Reasoning (RQ), consisting of Arithmetic and Figure Weights, as a narrow ability subsumed under FRI(Gf). Arithmetic, Vocabulary, and Figure Weights subtests had the highest g loadings. Cancellation had the lowest g loading. The WAIS-IV generally demonstrated full factor invariance between clinical and nonclinical samples.
BensonN.HulacD. M.KranzlerJ. H. (2010). Independent examination of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth edition (WAIS-IV): What does the WAIS-IV measure?Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 121-130.
2.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
3.
BowdenS. C.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (2011). Invariance of the measurement model underlying the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV in the United States and Canada. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 186-199.
4.
BowdenS. C.WeissL. G.HoldnackJ. A.LloydD. (2006). Age-related invariance of abilities measured with the Wechsler Adults Intelligence Scale-III. Psychological Assessment, 18, 334-339.
5.
ByrneB. M.StewartS. M. (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 287-321.
6.
CamaraW. J.NathanJ. S.PuenteA. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 141-154.
7.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CarrollJ. B. (1997). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In FlanaganD. P.GenshaftJ. L.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 122-130). New York, NY: Guilford.
9.
CarrollJ. B. (2005). The three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In FlanaganD. P.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 69-76). New York, NY: Guilford.
10.
CattellR. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153-193.
11.
CattellR. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1-22.
12.
CattellR. B.HornJ. L. (1978). A check on the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence with description of new subtest design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15, 139-164.
13.
ChenH.KeithT.ChenY.ChangB. (2009). What does the WISC-IV measure? Validation of the scoring and CHC-based interpretative approaches. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(3), 85-108.
14.
ChenF. F.SousaK. H.WestS. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471-492.
15.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
16.
CoalsonD. L.RaifordS. E.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (2010). Advances in the assessment of intelligence. In WeissL. G.SaklofskeD. H.CoalsonD. L.RaifordS. E. (2010). WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist–practitioner perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
CohenJ. (1957). The factorial structure of the WAIS between early adulthood and old age. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 283-290.
18.
CohenJ. (1959). The factorial structure of the WISC at ages 7-6, 10-6, and 13-6. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 285-299.
19.
ConwayA. R. A.CowanN.BuntingM. F.TherriaultD. J.MinkoffS. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163-183.
20.
CookeD. J.KossonD. S.MichieC. (2001). Psychopathy and ethnicity: Structural, item, and test generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in Caucasian and African American participants. Psychological Assessment, 13, 531-542.
21.
de JongP. F.Das-SmaalE. A. (1995). Attention and intelligence: The validity of the star counting test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 80-92.
22.
DrasgowF. (1984). Scrutinizing psychological tests: Measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are central issues. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 134-135.
23.
DrasgowF. (1987). Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 19-29.
24.
EngeldeAbreuP. M. J.ConwayA. R. A.GathercoleS. E. (2010). Working memory and fluid intelligence in young children. Intelligence, 38, 552-561.
25.
EngleR. W.TuholskiS. W.LaughlinJ. E.ConwayA. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309-331.
26.
FryA. F.HaleS. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 7, 237-241.
27.
FryA. F.HaleS. (2000). Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biological Psychology, 54, 1-34.
28.
GeorgasJ.van de VijverF. J. R.WeissL. G.SaklofskeD. H. (2003). A cross-cultural analysis of the WISC-III. In GeorgasJ.WeissL. G.van de VijverF. J. R.SaklofskeD. H. (Eds.), Culture and children’s intelligence: Cross-cultural analysis of the WISC-III (pp. 278-313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29.
HornJ. L.McArdleJ. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117-144.
30.
HoyleR. H.PanterA. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp.158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
32.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
33.
ImmekusJ. C.MallerS. J. (2010). Factor structure invariance of the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test across male and female samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 91-104.
KaneM. J.HambrickD. Z.ConwayA. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on AcKerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 66-71.
KaufmanA. S. (1975). Factor analysis of the WISC-R at 11 age levels between 6½ to 16½ years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(2), 135-147.
38.
KeithT. Z.ReynoldsM. R. (2010). CHC and cognitive abilities: What we’ve learned from 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 635-650
39.
KeithT. Z.ReynoldsM. R. (2012). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In FlanaganD. P.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
40.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
LichtenbergerE. O.KaufmanA. S. (2009). Essentials of WAIS-IV Assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley.
42.
LoehlinJ. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis (4th rev. ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
MallerS. J.FrenchB. F. (2004). Universal nonverbal intelligence test factor invariance across deaf and standardization samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 647-660.
44.
MarshH. W.BallaJ. R.McDonaldR. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
45.
McDonaldR. P.HoM. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.
46.
McGrewK. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In FlanaganD. P.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136-181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
47.
McGrewK.FlanaganD. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference: Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
PrifiteraA.WeissL. G.SaklofskeD. H.RolfhusE. (2005). The WISC-IV in the clinical assessment context. In PrifiteraA.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-Practitioner perspectives (pp.3-32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
50.
RabinL. A.BarrW. B.BurtonL. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Psychology, 20, 33-65.
51.
ReynoldsM. R.KeithT. Z. (2013). Measurement and statistical issues in child assessment research. In SaklofskeD. H.ReynoldsC. R.SchweanV. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of child and adolescent assessment.
52.
SchneiderW. J.McGrewK. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carrol model of intelligence. In FlanaganD. P.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
53.
SternbergR. J. (1995). In search of the human mind. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
54.
SternbergR. J. (2000). Handbook of Intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
55.
VandenbergR. J.LanceC. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-69.
56.
WardL. C.BergmanM. A.HerbertK. R. (2011). WAIS-IV subtest covariance structure: Conceptual and statistical considerations. Psychological Assessment, Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0025614
57.
WechslerD. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams &Wilkins.
58.
WechslerD. (1944). The measurement of adult intelligence (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
59.
WechslerD. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Williams & Wilkins.
60.
WechslerD. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation
WechslerD. (2002). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
63.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
64.
WechslerD. (2008a). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
65.
WechslerD. (2008b). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth Edition technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
66.
WeissL. G.SaklofskeD. H.CoalsonD. L.RaifordS. E. (2010a). Theoretical, empirical and clinical foundations of the WAIS-IV index scores. In WeissL. G.SaklofskeD. H.CoalsonD. L.RaifordS. E.(Eds.), WAIS-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation: Scientist–practitioner perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
67.
WeissL G.SaklofskeD. H.CoalsonD.RaifordS. E. (Eds.) (2010b). WAIS-IV clinical use and interpretation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
68.
WestS. G.FinchJ. P.CurranP. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
69.
WidamanK. F.ReiseS. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In BryantK. J.WindleM.WestS. G. (Eds.), The science of prevention (pp. 281-324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
