Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study examined the reliability and validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) for use with deaf and hard-of-hearing (D/HOH) children. Psychologists (n = 10) provided data for 128 D/HOH children who were assessed with the WISC-IV as part of routine assessments. All the WISC-IV subtests (8) and indexes (2) examined had split-half internal consistency coefficients that were higher (p < .05) than the values reported for the normative sample. The mean Perceptual Reasoning Index (M = 93.21) and Verbal Comprehension Index (M = 80.86) for D/HOH children were lower (p < .05) than the population mean (M = 100). Of the 44 inter-subtest correlations calculated, 29 were significantly greater than zero. The results support the reliability of the WISC-IV scores for D/ HOH children, although the findings suggest that the Perceptual Reasoning Index may have a different meaning than Performance IQ for D/HOH children.

Keywords

intelligence WISC-IV Wechsler deaf hard of hearing hearing impairment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alfonso, V.C. , Flanagan, D.P. , & Radwan, S. ( 2005). The impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory on test development and interpretation of cognitive and academic abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (2nd ed., pp. 185-202). New York: Guilford Press.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. ( 1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .

Braden, J.P. ( 1994). Deafness, deprivation, and IQ. New York: Plenum Press.

Braden, J.P. ( 2005). Hard-of-hearing and deaf clients: Using the WISC-IV with clients who are hard-of-hearing or deaf. In A. Prifitera , D. H. Saklofske , & L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation (pp. 351-376). Burlington, MA : Elsevier Academic Press.

Braden, J.P. , & Athanasiou, M.S. (2005). A comparative review of nonverbal measures of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (2nd ed., pp. 557-577). New York: Guilford Press.

Braden, J.P. , & Hannah, J.M. ( 1998). Assessment of hearing impaired and deaf children with the WISC-III. In D. Saklofske & A. Prifiter (Eds.), Use of the WISC-III in clinical practice (pp. 175-201). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Braden, J.P. , Kostrubala, C.E. , & Reed, J. ( 1994). Why do deaf children score differently on performance vs. motor-reduced nonverbal intelligence tests? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 357-363.

Braden, J.P. , Maller, S.J. , & Paquin, M.M. ( 1993). The effects of residential versus day placement on the performance IQs of children with hearing impairment. Journal of Special Education, 26, 423-433.

Feldt, L. ( 1969). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach’s alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficient twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika, 34, 363-373.

10.

Feldt, L.S. , & Brennan, R.L. ( 1989). Reliability. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 105-146). New York, NY: Macmillan.

11.

Gallaudet Research Institute. (November 2008 ). Regional and national summary report of data from the 2007-08 Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth. Washington, DC: GRI, Gallaudet University. Retrieved from http://research.gallaudet.edu/Demographics/2008_National_Summary.pdf

12.

Gregory, R.J. ( 2004). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

13.

Guilford, J.P. ( 1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

14.

Kostrubala, C. ( 1998). Translation of the WAIS-III from English to ASL (Unpublished master’s thesis), University of Wisconsin, Madison.

15.

Maller, S.J. , & Braden, J.P. ( 1993). The construct and criterion-related validity of the WISC-III with deaf adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , 11, 105-113.

16.

Saklofske, D.H. , Rolfhus, E. , Prifitera, A. , Zhu, J. , & Weiss, L.G. ( 2005). Clinical interpretation of the WISC-IV FSIQ and GIA. In A. Prifitera , D. H. Saklofske , & L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation (pp. 33-65). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.

17.

Sullivan, P.M. , & Vernon, M. ( 1979). Psychological assessment of hearing impaired children . School Psychology Digest, 8, 271-290.

18.

Wechsler, D. ( 2003). WISC-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

The Reliability and Validity of WISC-IV Scores With Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References