IQ Scores Should Not Be Adjusted for the Flynn Effect in Capital Punishment Cases

Abstract

Atkins v. Virginia (2002) dramatically raised the stakes for mental retardation in capital punishment cases, but neither defined this condition nor imposed uniform standards for its assessment. The basic premise that mean IQ scores shift over time enjoys wide recognition, but its application— including the appropriateness of characterizing it in terms of an allegedly predictable “Flynn effect”— is frequently debated in the course of death penalty litigation. The scientifically and ethically sound approach to this issue is to report IQ scores as obtained and be prepared to address those factors that might affect their reliability. Altering the IQ scores themselves is insufficiently supported by professional literature, legal authority, or prevailing standards of practice.

Keywords

practice standards Flynn effect IQ intelligence testing death penalty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).

Duvall, J.C. , & Morris, R.J. ( 2006). Assessing mental retardation in death penalty cases: Critical issues for psychology and psychological practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 658-665.

Ex Parte Eric Dewayne Cathey. Cause No. 713189, 176th District Court, Harris County, TX. January 25, 2010.

Flynn, J.R. ( 1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171-191.

Flynn, J.R. ( 1998). WAIS-III & WISC-III IQ gains in the United States from 1972 to 1995: How to compensate for obsolete norms. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 86, 1231-1239.

Flynn, J.R. ( 2000). The hidden history of IQ and special education: Can the problems be solved? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 191-198.

Flynn, J.R. ( 2006). Tethering the elephant: Capital cases, IQ, and the Flynn effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 170-189.

Hagan, L.D. , Drogin, E.Y. , & Guilmette, T.J. (2008). Adjusting IQ scores for the "Flynn Effect": Consistent with the standard of practice? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 619-625.

Kanaya, T. , Scullin, M.H. , & Ceci, S.J. ( 2003). The Flynn effect and U.S. policies: The impact of rising IQ scores on American society via mental retardation diagnoses. American Psychologist, 58, 778-790.

10.

Schalock, R. , Borthwick-Duffy, S. , Bradley, V. , Buntinx, W. , Coulter, D. , Craig, E. , . . . Yeager, M. ( 2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of support (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

11.

Shayer, M. , Ginsburg, D. , & Coe, R. ( 2007). Thirty years on-A large anti-Flynn Effect? The Piagetian test volume and heaviness norms 1975-2003. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 25-41.

12.

Spitz, H. ( 1989). Variations in Wechsler interscale IQ disparities at different levels of IQ. Intelligence, 13, 157-167.

13.

Teasdale, T. , & Owen, D. ( 2000). Forty-year secular trends in cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 28, 115-120.

14.

Wechsler, D. ( 2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, fourth edition: Technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

15.

Zhou, X. , Zhu, J. , & Weiss, L. A. (2010). Peeking inside the "black box" of the Flynn effect: Evidence from three Wechsler instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 399-411.