This study examines the reliability and validity of a Chinese-translated version of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS) and explores the effect of gender and age on each of the subscales. The sensitivity of SURPS in differentiating substance users and nonusers using the SURPS is also investigated. Data were collected from a convenience sample that consisted of 250 students from secondary schools in Hong Kong. Results indicated that the reliability of the subscales for introversion/hopelessness, impulsivity, sensation seeking, and anxiety sensitivity was comparable with those in previous studies. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor model of the original theoretical model of SURPS. However, no significant difference was found between each subscale score and the self-reported substance use behavior. Possible explanations on such findings are discussed. Despite the fact that the sensitivity of the SURPS in differentiating substance users and nonusers among Hong Kong adolescents is not supported, this study has provided some initial scientific evidence for adopting screening measures from the Western world to identify Chinese adolescents who are at risk for substance use.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. ( 1999). The standards for educational and psychological testing . Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
Bernstein, D.A., Clarke-Stewart, A., Penner, L.A., Roy, E.J., & Wickens, C.D. ( 2000). Psychology (5th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
3.
Biglan, A., Brennan, P. A. , Foster, S. L., & Holder, H. D. (Eds.). (2004). Helping adolescents at risk: Prevention of multiple problem behaviors. New York: Guilford.
4.
Castellanos, N., & Conrod, P.J. ( 2006). Brief interventions targeting personality risk factors for adolescent substance misuse reduce depression, panic and risk-taking behaviors . Journal of Mental Health, 15, 645-658.
5.
Central Registry of Drug Abuse. (2009, August). Reported drug abusers by age and sex. Hong Kong, SAR: Narcotics Division, Security Bureau.
6.
Cheung, C.K., & Tse, J.W.L. (2008). Hong Kong children’s posited "vulnerability" to social influence on substance abuse. Substance Use & Misuse, 43, 1532-1546.
7.
Conrod, P.J., Castellanos, N., & Mackie, C. ( 2008). Personality-targeted interventions delay growth of adolescent drinking and binge drinking. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 49, 181-190.
8.
Conrod, P.J., Pihl, R.O., Stewart, S.H., & Dongier, M. ( 2000). Validation of a system of classifying female substance abusers on the basis of personality and motivation risk factors for substance abuse. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 243-256.
9.
Conrod, P.J., Pihl, R.O., & Vassileva, J. ( 1998). Differential sensitivity to alcohol reinforcement in groups of men at risk for distinct alcoholism syndromes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 22, 585-597.
Conrod, P.J., & Woicik, P. ( 2002). Validation of a four-factor model of personality risk for substance abuse and examination of a brief instrument for assessing personality risk. Addiction Biology, 7, 329-426.
12.
Deas, D. ( 2006). Adolescent substance and psychiatric comorbidities. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67(Suppl. 7), 18-23.
13.
Geisinger, K.F. ( 1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments . Psychological Assessment, 6, 304-312.
14.
Gray, J.A. ( 1982). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hittner, J.B., & Swickert, R. ( 2006). Sensation seeking and alcohol use: A meta-analytic review . Addictive Behavior, 31, 1383-1401.
16.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. ( 1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
17.
Ismail, A.C., Seneviratne, R.A., Newcombe, P.A., & Wanigaratne, S. (2009). A model of substance abuse risk: Adapting to the Sri Lankan context. Evaluation Review , 22, 83-97.
Kuntsche, E., Knibbe, R., Gmel, G., & Engels, R. ( 2006). Who drinks and why? A review of socio-demographic, personality, and contextual issues behind the drinking motives in young people. Addictive Behavior, 31, 1844-1857.
20.
Narcotics Division of the Security Bureau. ( 2009). CRDA and drug statistics. Retrieved July 21, 2009, from http://www.nd.gov.hk/en/statistics_list.htm
21.
Orton, H.D., Riggs, P.D., & Libby, A.M. ( 2009). Prevalence and characteristics of depression and substance use in a US child welfare sample. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 649-653.
22.
Robbins, R.N., & Bryan, A. ( 2004). Relationships between future orientation, impulsive sensation seeking, and risk behavior among adjudicated adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 428-445.
23.
Rohde, P., Lewinsohn, P.M., Seeley, J.R., Klein, D.N., Andrews, J.A., & Small, J.W. ( 2007). Psychological functioning of adults who experienced substance use disorders as adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors , 21, 155-164.
24.
Shek, D.T.L. ( 2005). Economic stress, emotional quality of life, and problem behavior in Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage. Social Indicators Research, 71, 363-383.
25.
Shek, D.T.L. ( 2007). Tackling adolescent substance abuse in Hong Kong: Where we should and should not go. The ScientificWorldJOURNAL: TSW Child Health & Human Development, 7, 2021-2030.
26.
Steinberg, L. ( 2008). Adolescence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Stewart, S.H. ( 1996). Alcohol abuse in individuals exposed to trauma: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 83-112.
28.
Substance Use and Mental Health Service Administration. ( 2003). Overview of findings from the 2002 national survey on drug use and health. Rockville, MD: Author.
29.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. ( 2007). Using multivariate analysis (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
Tolan, P., & Morris, K. ( 2005). The inner-city of the United States and risk for substance use among youth. In I. Obot & S. Saxena (Eds.), Substance use among young people in urban environments (pp. 77-102). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
31.
Trim, R.S., Meehan, B.T., King, K.M., & Chassin, L. ( 2007). The relation between adolescent substance use and young adult internalizing symptoms: Findings from a high-risk longitudinal sample . Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 97-107.
32.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2006). World drug report: Vol. 1. Analysis . Vienna: Author.
33.
Wolft, M.W., & Wolft, K.A. ( 2002). Personality characteristics as a function of frequency and type of substance use. Adolescence, 37, 705-716.
